This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) activity and brain networks in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and their association with neurocognitive function (NCF). We analyzed 26 patients with subacute mTBI and 21 healthy controls. The subacute mTBI group (9 females, 17 males) had a mean age of 29.9 ± 9.9 years, and the healthy controls (11 females, 10 males) had a mean age of 29.7 ± 11.5 years. Current source density, lagged phase synchronization, and resting-state network activity were analyzed using exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA) with 60 s resting-state EEG data. In addition, a correlation analysis was performed between these EEG parameters and NCF in patients with mTBI. We used the statistical nonparametric mapping method in eLORETA to correct for multiple comparisons. There were no significant differences in EEG parameters between the patients with mTBI and healthy controls. However, in patients with mTBI, correlation analysis revealed negative correlations between theta activity in the anterior cingulate cortex and verbal short-term memory and between activity in the memory perception network and verbal memory. Our findings suggest that resting-state EEG may be clinically useful in investigating the mechanism of NCF decline in patients with mTBI.
Board on Health Care Services. Committee on the Review of the Department of Veterans Affairs Examinations for Traumatic Brain Injury.
2.
Lefevre-DogninCCognéMPerdrieauVGrangerAHeslotCAzouviP. Definition and epidemiology of mild traumatic brain injury. Neurochirurgie. 2021;67(3):218–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2020.02.002
3.
CassidyJDCarrollLJPelosoPM, et al.Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO collaborating centre task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2004(43 Suppl):28–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/16501960410023732
4.
BelangerHGCurtissGDemeryJALebowitzBKVanderploegRD. Factors moderating neuropsychological outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(3):215–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617705050277
5.
de Freitas CardosoMGFaleiroRMde PaulaJJ, et al.Cognitive impairment following acute mild traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2019;10:198. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00198
6.
RohlingMLBinderLMDemakisGJLarrabeeGJPloetzDMLanghinrichsen-RohlingJ. A meta-analysis of neuropsychological outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: Re-analyses and reconsiderations of Binder et al. (1997), Frencham et al. (2005), and Pertab et al. (2009). Clin Neuropsychol. 2011;25(4):608–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.565076
7.
DeanPJASterrA. Long-term effects of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00030
8.
Saar-AshkenazyRNaparstekSDizitzerY, et al.Neuro-psychiatric symptoms in directly and indirectly blast exposed civilian survivors of urban missile attacks. BMC Psychiatry. 2023;23(1):423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04943-1
9.
BiglerED. The lesion(s) in traumatic brain injury: Implications for clinical neuropsychology⋆. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;16(2):95–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/16.2.95
10.
LandreNPoppeCJDavisNSchmausBHobbsSE. Cognitive functioning and postconcussive symptoms in trauma patients with and without mild TBI. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006;21(4):255–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.12.007
11.
KrausMFSusmarasTCaughlinBPWalkerCJSweeneyJALittleDM. White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 10):2508–2519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm216
12.
NewcombeVChatfieldDOuttrimJ, et al.Mapping traumatic axonal injury using diffusion tensor imaging: Correlations with functional outcome. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019214
13.
KinnunenKMGreenwoodRPowellJH, et al.White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 2):449–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq347
14.
IrajiABensonRRWelchRD, et al.Resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury at the acute stage: Independent component and seed-based analyses. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(14):1031–1045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3610
15.
ChampagneAACoverdaleNSRossA, et al.Multi-modal normalization of resting-state using local physiology reduces changes in functional connectivity patterns observed in mTBI patients. Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102204
16.
AmirJNairJKRDel Carpio-O’DonovanR, et al.Atypical resting state functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Behav. 2021;11(8):e2261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2261
17.
NathanDEOakesTRYehPH, et al.Exploring variations in functional connectivity of the resting state default mode network in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Connect. 2015;5(2):102–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2014.0273
18.
PalaciosEMSala-LlonchRJunqueC, et al.Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(7):845–851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.38
19.
Robb SwanANicholsSDrakeA, et al.Magnetoencephalography slow-wave detection in patients with mild traumatic brain injury and ongoing symptoms correlated with long-term neuropsychological outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(19):1510–1521. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3654
20.
NordinLEMöllerMCJulinPBartfaiAHashimFLiTQ. Post mTBI fatigue is associated with abnormal brain functional connectivity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21183
21.
ShiJTengJDuXLiN. Multi-modal analysis of resting-state fMRI data in mTBI patients and association with neuropsychological outcomes. Front Neurol. 2021;12:639760. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.639760
22.
Avena-KoenigsbergerAMisicBSpornsO. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;19(1):17–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.149
23.
JohnstoneJThatcherRW. Quantitative EEG analysis and rehabilitation issues in mild traumatic brain injury. J Insur Med. 1991;23(4):228–232. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10147830
24.
ThatcherRWNorthDMCurtinRT, et al.An EEG severity index of traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;13(1):77–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.13.1.77
25.
BarrWBPrichepLSChabotRPowellMRMcCreaM. Measuring brain electrical activity to track recovery from sport-related concussion. Brain Inj. 2012;26(1):58–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.608216
26.
CaoCSlobounovS. Application of a novel measure of EEG non-stationarity as ‘Shannon- entropy of the peak frequency shifting’ for detecting residual abnormalities in concussed individuals. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122(7):1314–1321. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.12.042
27.
LewineJDDavisJTBiglerED, et al.Objective documentation of traumatic brain injury subsequent to mild head trauma: Multimodal brain imaging with MEG, SPECT, and MRI. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(3):141–155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HTR.0000271115.29954.27
HuangMXNicholsSBakerDG, et al.Single-subject-based whole-brain MEG slow-wave imaging approach for detecting abnormality in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. NeuroImage Clin. 2014;5:109–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.06.004
30.
KaltiainenHHelleLLiljeströmMRenvallHForssN. Theta-band oscillations as an indicator of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Topogr. 2018;31(6):1037–1046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-018-0667-2
31.
KumarSRaoSLChandramouliBAPillaiSV. Reduction of functional brain connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury during working memory. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(5):665–675. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0644
32.
BazarianJJElbinRJCasaDJ, et al.Validation of a machine learning brain electrical activity–based index to aid in diagnosing concussion among athletes. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37349
33.
Pascual-MarquiRDLehmannDKoukkouM, et al.Assessing interactions in the brain with exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2011;369(1952):3768–3784. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0081
34.
AokiYKazuiHPascal-MarquiRD, et al.EEG resting-state networks in dementia with Lewy bodies associated with clinical symptoms. Neuropsychobiology. 2019;77(4):206–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000495620
35.
AokiYKazuiHPascual-MarquiRD, et al.EEG resting-state networks responsible for gait disturbance features in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2019;50(3):210–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059418812156
36.
AokiYTakahashiRSuzukiY, et al.EEG resting-state networks in Alzheimer’s disease associated with clinical symptoms. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30075-3
37.
HataMKazuiHTanakaT, et al.Functional connectivity assessed by resting state EEG correlates with cognitive decline of Alzheimer’s disease – an eLORETA study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127(2):1269–1278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.10.030
38.
UedaMUsamiKYamaoY, et al.Correlation between brain functional connectivity and neurocognitive function in patients with left frontal glioma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):18302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22493-6
39.
CavanaghJFWilsonJKRiegerRE, et al.ERPs predict symptomatic distress and recovery in sub-acute mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia. 2019;132:107125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107125
40.
CavanaghJFRiegerREWilsonJK, et al.Joint analysis of frontal theta synchrony and white matter following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav. 2020;14(6):2210–2223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00171-y
41.
KingNSCrawfordSWendenFJMossNEWadeDT. The rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995;242(9):587–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00868811
BrandtJBenedictRHB. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. Psychological Assessment Resources; Published online2001.
44.
MazziottaJTogaAEvansA, et al.A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001;356(1412):1293–1322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0915
45.
VitaccoDBrandeisDPascual-MarquiRMartinE. Correspondence of event-related potential tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging during language processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(1):4–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10038
46.
MulertCJägerLSchmittR, et al.Integration of fMRI and simultaneous EEG: Towards a comprehensive understanding of localization and time-course of brain activity in target detection. Neuroimage. 2004;22(1):83–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.051
47.
WorrellGALagerlundTDSharbroughFW, et al.Localization of the epileptic focus by low-resolution electromagnetic tomography in patients with a lesion demonstrated by MRI. Brain Topogr. 2000;12(4):273–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023407521772
48.
DierksTJelicVPascual-MarquiRD, et al.Spatial pattern of cerebral glucose metabolism (PET) correlates with localization of intracerebral EEG-generators in Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111(10):1817–1824. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00427-2
49.
ZumstegDFriedmanAWieserHGWennbergRA. Propagation of interictal discharges in temporal lobe epilepsy: Correlation of spatiotemporal mapping with intracranial foramen ovale electrode recordings. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(12):2615–2626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.07.319
50.
NicholsTEHolmesAP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;15(1):1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.1058
51.
LiRWangSZhuL, et al.Aberrant functional connectivity of resting state networks in transient ischemic attack. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e71009. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071009
52.
PascualBMasdeuJCHollenbeckM, et al.Large-scale brain networks of the human left temporal pole: A functional connectivity MRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2015;25(3):680–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht260
53.
AokiYIshiiRPascual-MarquiRD, et al.Detection of EEG-resting state independent networks by eLORETA-ICA method. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:31. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00031
Pascual-MarquiRDBiscay-LirioRJ. Interaction patterns of brain activity across space, time and frequency. Part I: methods. http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2852v
57.
HolmesAPBlairRCWatsonJDFordI. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16(1):7–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-199601000-00002
58.
AndererPSaletuBSemlitschHVPascual-MarquiRD. Electrical sources of P300 event-related brain potentials revealed by low resolution electromagnetic tomography. 2. Effects of nootropic therapy in age-associated memory impairment. Neuropsychobiology. 1998;37(1):28–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000026473
59.
Pascual-MarquiRDLehmannDKoenigT, et al.Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 1999;90(3):169–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-4927(99)00013-x
60.
Michael A PersingerPLC. Standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (s_LORETA) is a sensitive indicator of protracted neuropsychological impairments following “mild” (concussive) traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurophysiol. 2013;04(05). doi:https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9562.1000176
61.
Leon-CarrionJMartin-RodriguezJFDamas-LopezJBarroso y MartinJMDominguez-MoralesMR. Brain function in the minimally conscious state: A quantitative neurophysiological study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(7):1506–1514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.030
62.
ArciniegasDB. Clinical electrophysiologic assessments and mild traumatic brain injury: State-of-the-science and implications for clinical practice. Int J Psychophysiol. 2011;82(1):41–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.03.004
63.
MooreRDSauveWEllembergD. Neurophysiological correlates of persistent psycho-affective alterations in athletes with a history of concussion. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016;10(4):1108–1116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9473-6
64.
LewineJDPlisSUlloaA, et al.Quantitative EEG biomarkers for mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;36(4):298–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000588
65.
ThatcherRWWalkerRAGersonIGeislerFH. EEG Discriminant analyses of mild head trauma. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;73(2):94–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(89)90188-0
66.
DunkleyBTDa CostaLBethuneA, et al.Low-frequency connectivity is associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin. 2015;7:611–621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.02.020
67.
WechslerD. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition. PsycTESTS Dataset; Published online February 11, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/t49755-000
68.
ElliotCDMurrayDJPearsonLS. British Abilities Scales. NFER-Nelson; Published online1983.
69.
AeschbachDMatthewsJRPostolacheTTJacksonMAGiesenHAWehrTA. Dynamics of the human EEG during prolonged wakefulness: Evidence for frequency-specific circadian and homeostatic influences. Neurosci Lett. 1997;239(2-3):121–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00904-x
70.
IshiharaTYoshiiN. Multivariate analytic study of EEG and mental activity in Juvenile delinquents. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1972;33(1):71–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(72)90026-0
71.
IshiiRCanuetLIshiharaT, et al.Frontal midline theta rhythm and gamma power changes during focused attention on mental calculation: An MEG beamformer analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:406. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00406
72.
BrzezickaAKamińskiJReedCMChungJMMamelakANRutishauserU. Working memory load-related theta power decreases in dorsolateral prefrontal Cortex predict individual differences in performance. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019;31(9):1290–1307. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01417
73.
ScheeringaRBastiaansenMCMPeterssonKMOostenveldRNorrisDGHagoortP. Frontal theta EEG activity correlates negatively with the default mode network in resting state. Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;67(3):242–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.017
74.
ScheeringaRPeterssonKMOostenveldRNorrisDGHagoortPBastiaansenMCM. Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance. Neuroimage. 2009;44(3):1224–1238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.041
75.
SnipesSKrugliakovaEMeierEHuberR. The theta paradox: 4-8 Hz EEG oscillations reflect both sleep pressure and cognitive control. J Neurosci. 2022;42(45):8569–8586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1063-22.2022
76.
CarlsonJMBeacherFReinkeKS, et al.Nonconscious attention bias to threat is correlated with anterior cingulate cortex gray matter volume: A voxel-based morphometry result and replication. Neuroimage. 2012;59(2):1713–1718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.040
77.
KillgoreWDSYurgelun-ToddDA. Activation of the amygdala and anterior cingulate during nonconscious processing of sad versus happy faces. Neuroimage. 2004;21(4):1215–1223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.033
78.
NeeDEKastnerSBrownJW. Functional heterogeneity of conflict, error, task-switching, and unexpectedness effects within medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):528–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.027
79.
GasquoinePG. Localization of function in anterior cingulate cortex: From psychosurgery to functional neuroimaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37(3):340–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.002
80.
YonelinasAPOttenLJShawKNRuggMD. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J Neurosci. 2005;25(11):3002–3008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005
81.
SestieriCCorbettaMRomaniGLShulmanGL. Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: Functional and topographic analyses. J Neurosci. 2011;31(12):4407–4420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3335-10.2011
82.
HillaryFGMedagliaJDGatesK, et al.Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 5):1555–1570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr043
83.
HillaryFGRomanCAVenkatesanURajtmajerSMBajoRCastellanosND. Hyperconnectivity is a fundamental response to neurological disruption. Neuropsychology. 2015;29(1):59–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000110
84.
BairdBSmallwoodJGorgolewskiKJMarguliesDS. Medial and lateral networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and perception. J Neurosci. 2013;33(42):16657–16665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-13.2013
85.
LockhartSNLuckSJGengJ, et al.White matter hyperintensities among older adults are associated with futile increase in frontal activation and functional connectivity during spatial search. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0122445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122445
86.
SayyahMEslamiKAlaiShehniSKoutiL. Cognitive function before and during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry J. 2016;2016:5480391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5480391
87.
BiringerERongveALundA. A review of modern antidepressants effects on neurocognitive function. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2009;5(3):164–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/157340009788971137
88.
SkalskiMMachAJanuszkoP, et al.Pharmaco-electroencephalography-based assessment of antidepressant drug efficacy-the use of magnesium ions in the treatment of depression. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14):3135. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10143135
