In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), requiring the repatriation of ancestral remains, funerary, and sacred objects from museums to source communities. Since then, hundreds of thousands of repatriations have occurred, allowing for respectful treatment of ancestors and reconnections to spiritual, communal practice, and ceremony. In Canada, repatriation has been recommended by the Assembly of First Nations, the Canadian Museum Association, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, but there is no federal law. Does Canada have a functioning alternative? This examination provides a comparison of how repatriation differs in the two countries, demonstrating that case-by-case negotiations in Canada currently allow for more flexibility and customization to the needs of different Indigenous communities but that the transparency, coordination, and funding associated with NAGPRA would be a significant benefit to claimants in Canada.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
135 Congressional Record S12363–S12468 (daily ed., October 3, 1989) (statement of Mr. Moynihan).
2.
AkhtarZia. 2017. “Storytelling as Testimony and the Rule against Hearsay’ In Trial Evidence.Chicago: American Bar Association.
Assembly of First Nations and Canadian Museum Association.1994. Turning the Page: Forging New Partnerships between Museums and First Peoples.Ottawa: Canada Council for the Arts.
6.
BairdJill R., SolankiAnjuli, and AskrenMique'l, eds. 2008. Returning the Past: Repatriation of First Nations Cultural Property: Four Case Studies of First Nations Repatriation.Vancouver: Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia.
7.
BarreraJorge. 2018. “Liberal MP's Bill Aims to Create National Strategy for Repatriating Indigenous Cultural Items.”CBC News, February 3.
8.
BellCatherine, and McCuaigHeather. 2008. “Protection and Repatriation of Ktunaxa/Kinbasket Cultural Resources: Perspectives of Community Members.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by BellCatherine, and NapoleonVal, 312–364. Vancouver: UBC Press.
9.
BellCatherine, and PatersonR. K.1999. “Aboriginal Rights to Cultural Property in Canada.”International Journal of Cultural Property8, no. 1: 167–211.
10.
BellCatherine, RavenHeather, and McCuaigHeather, in consultation with Andrea Sanborn, the U'Mista Cultural Society, and the ‘Namgis Nation. 2008. “Recovering from Colonization: Perspectives of Community Members on Protection and Repatriation of KwaKwaka'wakw Cultural Heritage.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by BellCatherine, and NapoleonVal, 33–91. Vancouver: UBC Press.
11.
BellCatherine, StattGraham, and SolowanMichael. 2008. “First Nations Cultural Heritage: A Selected Survey of Issues and Initiatives.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by BellCatherine, and NapoleonVal, 367–414. Vancouver: UBC Press.
12.
Bill C-391. 2018. An Act Respecting a National Strategy for the Repatriation of Aboriginal Cultural Property of 2018. 1st sess., 42nd Parliament, HCC 64-65–66.
13.
BlairS., JarrattT., and WardP.2014. “Weaving Together Two Ways of Knowing: Archaeological Organic Artifact Analysis and Indigenous Textile Arts.”North American Archaeologist35, no. 4: 295–302.
14.
CampbellEmmy-Lou. 2010. “The Transformative Power of T'xwelatse: A Collaborative Case Study in Search of New Approaches to Indigenous Cultural Repatriation Processes.” MA thesis, University of Victoria.
15.
Canada. Indigenous and Northern Affairs.2017. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.Ottawa: Government of Canada.
16.
Canada. Parliament.2016. Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples. Border Crossing Issues and the Jay Treaty. 1st sess., 42nd Parliament. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
17.
ChariSangita, and LavalleeJaime M. N., eds. 2013. Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
18.
ChildBrenda J.2009. “Introduction: Creation of the Tribal Museum.” In Contesting Knowledge: Museums and Indigenous Perspectives, edited by Sleeper-SmithSusan, 251–256. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
ConatyGerald T.2008. “The Effects of Repatriation on the Relationship between the Glenbow Museum and the Blackfoot People.”Museum Management and Curatorship23, no. 3: 245–259.
21.
CurtisNeil G. W.2019. “Repatriation from Scottish Museums: Learning from NAGPRA.”Museum Anthropology33, no. 2: 234–248.
EwingRobyn G.2011. “Finding Middle Ground: Case Studies in Negotiated Repatriation.” MA thesis, Simon Fraser University.
24.
FentonWilliam N.1989. “Return of Eleven Wampum Belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy on Grand River, Canada.”Ethnohistory36, no. 4: 392–410.
25.
SénatFrance. “Loi n. 2010–501 du 18 mai 2010 visant á autoriser la restitution par la France des têtes Maories à la Nouvelle-Zélande et relative è la gestion des collections.”Paris: Government of France.
26.
HardingSarah K.1997. “Justifying Repatriation of Native American Cultural Property’Indiana Law Journal72, no. 723: 724–774.
27.
International Council of Museums.2017. ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums.Paris: International Council of Museums.
28.
JacknisIra. 2008. “A New Thing? The National Museum of the American Indian in Historical and Institutional Perspective.” In The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations, edited by LonetreeAmy, and CobbAmanda J., 3–42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
29.
JenkinsTiffany. 2011. Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections: The Crisis of Cultural Authority.New York: Routledge.
30.
JessimanStacey R.2014. “The Edgy State of Decolonization at the Canadian Museum of History.”University of British Columbia Law Review47, no. 3: 889–925.
31.
KeelerHonor. 2015. A Guide to International Repatriation: Starting an Initiative in Your Community.Rockville, MD: American Association for Indian Affairs.
32.
“Kennewick Man, the Ancient One.”2017. Seattle, WA: Burke Museum.
33.
KrmpotichCara, and PeersLaura. 2014. This Is Our Life: Haida Material Heritage and Changing Museum Practice.Vancouver: UBC Press.
34.
KuprechtKarolina. 2014. Indigenous Peoples' Cultural Property Claims: Repatriation and Beyond.Cham: Springer International.
35.
LangloisMarie-Claude. 2013. Canada's National Museums.Ottawa: Parliament of Canada.
36.
LenzeriniFrederico. 2016. “Cultural Identity, Human Rights, and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples.”Brown Journal of World Affairs23, no. 1: 127–141.
37.
LoganMarty. 2003. “Museum, Kitigan Zibi in Tug of War over Remains.”Windspeaker20, no. 10: 24.
38.
LonetreeAmy. 2012. Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
39.
McKeownC. Timothy. 2012. In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation, 1986–1990.Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
40.
McKeownC. Timothy, PalusEmily, RiordanJennifer, and WaldbauerRichard. 2013. “Federal Agency Perspective.” In Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, edited by ChariSangita, and LavalleeJaime M. N., 135–160. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
41.
MeisterBarbara, ed. 1997. Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide.New York: American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation.
O'NeillMark. 2004. “Repatriation and Its Discontents: The Glasgow Experience.” In Who Owns Objects? The Ethics and Politics of Collecting Cultural Artefacts, edited by RobsonEleanor, TreadwellLuke, and GosdenChris, 105–128. Oxford: Oxbow.
46.
Ontario Human Rights Commission.2015. “Policy on Preventing Discrimination Based on Creed: Indigenous Spiritual Practices.”Ottawa: Ontario Human Rights Commission.
47.
“Our History”.2018. New York: American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation.
48.
PeckDanielle, and SeabornAlex, prods. 1995. Bones of Contention: Native American Archaeology.London: British Broadcasting Corporation.
49.
PlatzmanSteven. 1992. “Objects of Controversy: The Native American Right to Repatriation.”American University Law Review41, no. 2: 517–558.
50.
RasmussenMorten, SikoraMartin, AlbrechstenAnders, KorneliussenThorfinn Sand, and Victor Moreno-MayarJ.2015. “The Ancestry and Affiliation of Kennewick Man.”Nature523: 455–458.
51.
Saskatchewan. 2007. “Royal Saskatchewan Museum Act.” c.R-23.01 Regina: Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan.
52.
SiegfriedEvelyn. 2014. “Repatriation of Sacred and Ceremonial Objects: The Royal Saskatchewan Museum Story.”Regina: Royal Saskatchewan Museum.
53.
SmilieChristine Marie. 2005. “The People Left Out of Treaty 8.” MA thesis, University of Saskatchewan.
54.
SmithCathay Y. N.2016. “Oral Tradition and Kennewick Man.”Yale Law Journal Forum126: 216–231.
55.
UNESCO.1999. “International Code of Ethics for Dealers in Cultural Property.”Paris: UNESCO.
56.
UNESCO.2017. “Intergovernmental Committee (ICPRCP).”Paris: UNESCO.
57.
UNESCO.2017. “Return or Restitution Cases.”Paris, UNESCO.
58.
United Nations, Division for Social Policy and Development, Indigenous Peoples.2008. “United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.”New York: United Nations.
59.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.2013. “Determining Cultural Affiliation within NAGPRA.”Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.
60.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.“NAGPRA Glossary.”Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.
61.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.2017. “NAGPRA Grants.”Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.
62.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.“National NAGPRA.”Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.
63.
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service.2018. “National NAGPRA Online Databases.”Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.
64.
Weasel HeadFrank. 2015. “Repatriation Experiences of the Kainai.” In We Are Coming Home: Repatriation and the Restoration of Blackfoot Cultural Confidence, edited by ConatyGerald T., 151–181. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
65.
WeberBob. 2017. “Precious Ceremonial Objects Slowly Being Returned to First Nations from Museums.”Global News, December 15.
66.
WeissElizabeth. 2008. Reburying the Past: The Effects of Repatriation and Reburial on Scientific Inquiry.New York: Nova Science.
67.
WhalenJulia. 2017. “Pipe Chief Calls for Royal Ontario Museum to Return Indigenous Artifacts.”CBC News, June 20.
68.
WhittamJulian. 2015. “‘In a Good Way’: Repatriation, Community and Development in Kitigan Zibi.”Anthropologica57, no. 2: 501–509.
69.
WhyteMurray. 2017. “Long Road to Recovery for Indigenous Sacred Objects.”Toronto Star, November 17.
70.
WunderlichCaitlin S.2017. “Museum Sector Policy Deficit: Repatriation from United States Museums.”The Museum Scholar1, no. 1.
