Challenging the “Love of Possessions”: Repatriation of Sacred Objects in the United States and Canada

Abstract

In 1990, the United States passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), requiring the repatriation of ancestral remains, funerary, and sacred objects from museums to source communities. Since then, hundreds of thousands of repatriations have occurred, allowing for respectful treatment of ancestors and reconnections to spiritual, communal practice, and ceremony. In Canada, repatriation has been recommended by the Assembly of First Nations, the Canadian Museum Association, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, but there is no federal law. Does Canada have a functioning alternative? This examination provides a comparison of how repatriation differs in the two countries, demonstrating that case-by-case negotiations in Canada currently allow for more flexibility and customization to the needs of different Indigenous communities but that the transparency, coordination, and funding associated with NAGPRA would be a significant benefit to claimants in Canada.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

135 Congressional Record S12363–S12468 (daily ed., October 3, 1989) (statement of Mr. Moynihan).

Akhtar

Zia

. 2017. “Storytelling as Testimony and the Rule against Hearsay’ In Trial Evidence. Chicago: American Bar Association.

Alberta . 2016. “First Nations Sacred Ceremonial Objects Repatriation Act, RSA 2000.” c. F-14.

“American Collections.” Horniman Museum and Gardens. https://www.horniman.ac.uk/collections/american-collections.

Assembly of First Nations and Canadian Museum Association. 1994. Turning the Page: Forging New Partnerships between Museums and First Peoples. Ottawa: Canada Council for the Arts.

Baird

Jill R.

, Solanki

Anjuli

, and Askren

Mique'l

, eds. 2008. Returning the Past: Repatriation of First Nations Cultural Property: Four Case Studies of First Nations Repatriation. Vancouver: Museum of Anthropology at the University of British Columbia.

Barrera

Jorge

. 2018. “Liberal MP's Bill Aims to Create National Strategy for Repatriating Indigenous Cultural Items.” CBC News, February 3.

Bell

Catherine

, and McCuaig

Heather

. 2008. “Protection and Repatriation of Ktunaxa/Kinbasket Cultural Resources: Perspectives of Community Members.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by Bell

Catherine

, and Napoleon

Val

, 312–364. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Bell

Catherine

, and Paterson

R. K.

1999. “Aboriginal Rights to Cultural Property in Canada.” International Journal of Cultural Property 8, no. 1: 167–211.

10.

Bell

Catherine

, Raven

Heather

, and McCuaig

Heather

, in consultation with Andrea Sanborn, the U'Mista Cultural Society, and the ‘Namgis Nation. 2008. “Recovering from Colonization: Perspectives of Community Members on Protection and Repatriation of KwaKwaka'wakw Cultural Heritage.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by Bell

Catherine

, and Napoleon

Val

, 33–91. Vancouver: UBC Press.

11.

Bell

Catherine

, Statt

Graham

, and Solowan

Michael

. 2008. “First Nations Cultural Heritage: A Selected Survey of Issues and Initiatives.” In First Nations Cultural Heritage and Law: Case Studies, Voices and Perspectives, edited by Bell

Catherine

, and Napoleon

Val

, 367–414. Vancouver: UBC Press.

12.

Bill C-391. 2018. An Act Respecting a National Strategy for the Repatriation of Aboriginal Cultural Property of 2018. 1st sess., 42nd Parliament, HCC 64-65–66.

13.

Blair

, Jarratt

, and Ward

2014. “Weaving Together Two Ways of Knowing: Archaeological Organic Artifact Analysis and Indigenous Textile Arts.” North American Archaeologist 35, no. 4: 295–302.

14.

Campbell

Emmy-Lou

. 2010. “The Transformative Power of T'xwelatse: A Collaborative Case Study in Search of New Approaches to Indigenous Cultural Repatriation Processes.” MA thesis, University of Victoria.

15.

Canada. Indigenous and Northern Affairs. 2017. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

16.

Canada. Parliament. 2016. Standing Senate Committee on Aboriginal Peoples. Border Crossing Issues and the Jay Treaty. 1st sess., 42nd Parliament. Ottawa: Government of Canada.

17.

Chari

Sangita

, and Lavallee

Jaime M. N.

, eds. 2013. Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

18.

Child

Brenda J.

2009. “Introduction: Creation of the Tribal Museum.” In Contesting Knowledge: Museums and Indigenous Perspectives, edited by Sleeper-Smith

Susan

, 251–256. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

19.

Claw

Katrina G.

, Lippert

Dorothy

, Bardill

Jessica

, Cordova

Anna

, Fox

Keolu

, Yracheta

Joseph

, Bader

Alyssa C.

2017. “Chaco Canyon Dig Unearths Ethical Concerns.” Human Biology Open Access Pre-Prints 122.

20.

Conaty

Gerald T.

2008. “The Effects of Repatriation on the Relationship between the Glenbow Museum and the Blackfoot People.” Museum Management and Curatorship 23, no. 3: 245–259.

21.

Curtis

Neil G. W.

2019. “Repatriation from Scottish Museums: Learning from NAGPRA.” Museum Anthropology 33, no. 2: 234–248.

22.

Dibbelt

Dan

. 1988. “Nations Gather to Protest Glenbow's Spirit Sings Display.” Windspeaker 5, no. 23: 2.

23.

Ewing

Robyn G.

2011. “Finding Middle Ground: Case Studies in Negotiated Repatriation.” MA thesis, Simon Fraser University.

24.

Fenton

William N.

1989. “Return of Eleven Wampum Belts to the Six Nations Iroquois Confederacy on Grand River, Canada.” Ethnohistory 36, no. 4: 392–410.

25.

Sénat

France

. “Loi n. 2010–501 du 18 mai 2010 visant á autoriser la restitution par la France des têtes Maories à la Nouvelle-Zélande et relative è la gestion des collections.” Paris: Government of France.

26.

Harding

Sarah K.

1997. “Justifying Repatriation of Native American Cultural Property’ Indiana Law Journal 72, no. 723: 724–774.

27.

International Council of Museums. 2017. ICOM Code of Ethics for Museums. Paris: International Council of Museums.

28.

Jacknis

Ira

. 2008. “A New Thing? The National Museum of the American Indian in Historical and Institutional Perspective.” In The National Museum of the American Indian: Critical Conversations, edited by Lonetree

Amy

, and Cobb

Amanda J.

, 3–42. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

29.

Jenkins

Tiffany

. 2011. Contesting Human Remains in Museum Collections: The Crisis of Cultural Authority. New York: Routledge.

30.

Jessiman

Stacey R.

2014. “The Edgy State of Decolonization at the Canadian Museum of History.” University of British Columbia Law Review 47, no. 3: 889–925.

31.

Keeler

Honor

. 2015. A Guide to International Repatriation: Starting an Initiative in Your Community. Rockville, MD: American Association for Indian Affairs.

32.

“Kennewick Man, the Ancient One.” 2017. Seattle, WA: Burke Museum.

33.

Krmpotich

Cara

, and Peers

Laura

. 2014. This Is Our Life: Haida Material Heritage and Changing Museum Practice. Vancouver: UBC Press.

34.

Kuprecht

Karolina

. 2014. Indigenous Peoples' Cultural Property Claims: Repatriation and Beyond. Cham: Springer International.

35.

Langlois

Marie-Claude

. 2013. Canada's National Museums. Ottawa: Parliament of Canada.

36.

Lenzerini

Frederico

. 2016. “Cultural Identity, Human Rights, and Repatriation of Cultural Heritage of Indigenous Peoples.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 23, no. 1: 127–141.

37.

Logan

Marty

. 2003. “Museum, Kitigan Zibi in Tug of War over Remains.” Windspeaker 20, no. 10: 24.

38.

Lonetree

Amy

. 2012. Decolonizing Museums: Representing Native America in National and Tribal Museums. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

39.

McKeown

C. Timothy

. 2012. In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation, 1986–1990. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

40.

McKeown

C. Timothy

, Palus

Emily

, Riordan

Jennifer

, and Waldbauer

Richard

. 2013. “Federal Agency Perspective.” In Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, edited by Chari

Sangita

, and Lavallee

Jaime M. N.

, 135–160. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.

41.

Meister

Barbara

, ed. 1997. Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide. New York: American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation.

42.

“MP Bill Casey Introduces Aboriginal Cultural Property Repatriation Act.” https://bcasey.liberal.ca/news-nouvelles/working-together-to-repatriate-cultural-property.

43.

Narine

Shari

. 2016. “Repatriation of Sacred Objects Should Be Overseen by Indigenous Committee.” Windspeaker 34, no. 7: 21–22.

44.

National Congress of American Indians. “Support for International Repatriation: Resolution #Sac-12-008.” http://www.ncai.org/resources/resolutions/support-for-international-repatriation.

45.

O'Neill

Mark

. 2004. “Repatriation and Its Discontents: The Glasgow Experience.” In Who Owns Objects? The Ethics and Politics of Collecting Cultural Artefacts, edited by Robson

Eleanor

, Treadwell

Luke

, and Gosden

Chris

, 105–128. Oxford: Oxbow.

46.

Ontario Human Rights Commission. 2015. “Policy on Preventing Discrimination Based on Creed: Indigenous Spiritual Practices.” Ottawa: Ontario Human Rights Commission.

47.

“Our History”. 2018. New York: American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation.

48.

Peck

Danielle

, and Seaborn

Alex

, prods. 1995. Bones of Contention: Native American Archaeology. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.

49.

Platzman

Steven

. 1992. “Objects of Controversy: The Native American Right to Repatriation.” American University Law Review 41, no. 2: 517–558.

50.

Rasmussen

Morten

, Sikora

Martin

, Albrechsten

Anders

, Korneliussen

Thorfinn Sand

, and Victor Moreno-Mayar

2015. “The Ancestry and Affiliation of Kennewick Man.” Nature 523: 455–458.

51.

Saskatchewan . 2007. “Royal Saskatchewan Museum Act.” c.R-23.01 Regina: Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan.

52.

Siegfried

Evelyn

. 2014. “Repatriation of Sacred and Ceremonial Objects: The Royal Saskatchewan Museum Story.” Regina: Royal Saskatchewan Museum.

53.

Smilie

Christine Marie

. 2005. “The People Left Out of Treaty 8.” MA thesis, University of Saskatchewan.

54.

Smith

Cathay Y. N.

2016. “Oral Tradition and Kennewick Man.” Yale Law Journal Forum 126: 216–231.

55.

UNESCO. 1999. “International Code of Ethics for Dealers in Cultural Property.” Paris: UNESCO.

56.

UNESCO. 2017. “Intergovernmental Committee (ICPRCP).” Paris: UNESCO.

57.

UNESCO. 2017. “Return or Restitution Cases.” Paris, UNESCO.

58.

United Nations, Division for Social Policy and Development, Indigenous Peoples. 2008. “United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.” New York: United Nations.

59.

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2013. “Determining Cultural Affiliation within NAGPRA.” Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.

60.

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. “NAGPRA Glossary.” Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.

61.

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2017. “NAGPRA Grants.” Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.

62.

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. “National NAGPRA.” Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.

63.

U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2018. “National NAGPRA Online Databases.” Washington, D.C.: National Park Service.

64.

Weasel Head

Frank

. 2015. “Repatriation Experiences of the Kainai.” In We Are Coming Home: Repatriation and the Restoration of Blackfoot Cultural Confidence, edited by Conaty

Gerald T.

, 151–181. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.

65.

Weber

Bob

. 2017. “Precious Ceremonial Objects Slowly Being Returned to First Nations from Museums.” Global News, December 15.

66.

Weiss

Elizabeth

. 2008. Reburying the Past: The Effects of Repatriation and Reburial on Scientific Inquiry. New York: Nova Science.

67.

Whalen

Julia

. 2017. “Pipe Chief Calls for Royal Ontario Museum to Return Indigenous Artifacts.” CBC News, June 20.

68.

Whittam

Julian

. 2015. “‘In a Good Way’: Repatriation, Community and Development in Kitigan Zibi.” Anthropologica 57, no. 2: 501–509.

69.

Whyte

Murray

. 2017. “Long Road to Recovery for Indigenous Sacred Objects.” Toronto Star, November 17.

70.

Wunderlich

Caitlin S.

2017. “Museum Sector Policy Deficit: Repatriation from United States Museums.” The Museum Scholar 1, no. 1.