Borrowed Notion of Authenticity: Viewing Authenticity of Historic Houses in India using a Western Lens

Abstract

Authenticity is considered by UNESCO (The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) as the link between attributes and Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). It is the ability of a property to truthfully, credibly, and genuinely convey its OUV through the attributes. However, these attributes or values are dependent on the site’s cultural associations and context. Therefore, the concept of authenticity is vague and may be subject to different cultural and social interpretations. Since authenticity is measured in time, there are multiple layers of authenticity which can be interpreted differently with diverse value systems. Since the notion of conservation is European in origin, so is the understanding of authenticity. In the Indian context due to a colonial past, the understanding of heritage protection and conservation with all the associated concepts are a borrowed notion from the Western world. This leads to the dilemma where a Western methodology for values and attributes is applied to assess the authenticity of the historic houses in India, based on which the authenticity of Indian historic houses becomes questionable when compared with international standards.

Keywords

museum conservation case study materiality research and topics indigenous communities cultural heritage visitor engagement historic houses authenticity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alho

Morais

Mendes

Galvao

. “Authenticity Criteria in Conservation of Historic Buildings.” Technical University of Lisbon, Luciada University, Polytechnic University of Tomar. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB18871.pdf.

Glendinning

Miles

. The Conservation Movement: A History of Architectural Preservation-Antiquity to Modernity. Oxford: Routledge, 2013.

Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage. “Charter for Conservation of Unprotected Architectural Heritage and Sites in India.” New Delhi, 2004. http://www.intach.org/about-charter.php

International Council on Monuments and Sites. “The Athens Charter for Restoration of Historic Monuments.” 1931. https://www.icomos.org/en/167-the-athens-charter-for-the-restoration-of-historic-monuments.

International Council on Monuments and Sites. “The Nara Document on Authenticity.” Japan: ICOMOS Symposia, 1994. https://www.icomos.org/en/179-articles-en-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/386-the-nara-document-on-authenticity-1994.

International Council on Monuments and Sites. “The Venice Charter—International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites.” Venice, 1964. https://www.icomos.org/venicecharter2004/.

Menon

A. G. Krishna

. “Conservation in India—A Search for Direction.” Architecture and Design 6, no. 1 (1989): 22–27.

Menon

A. G. Krishna

. “The Case for an Indian Charter.” Restoration and Renewal - A symposium on preserving our cultural heritage, Seminar Web-edition #530. New Delhi, October 2003.

Menon

A. G. Krishna

. “The Idea of Place in Practice of Restoration and Replication in India, Concepts of Authenticity in Architectural Heritage Preservation.” An International Workshop of the Cluster of Excellence, Heidelberg University, 16 June 2008.

10.

Prakash

Arun

. Raj Bhawan Nainital-A Scottish Castle in Kumaon Highlands. Dehradun: Governor’s Secretariat, 2006.