This article describes the establishment of a participatory, rapid response archive, and an assessment of metadata quality applied by student curators between March and September 2020. A Journal of the Plague Year: An Archive of COVID-19 (JOTPY) was founded to document the COVID-19 pandemic, and is titled after Daniel Defoe’s 1722 book of the same name. As a participatory collection, A Journal of the Plague Year: An Archive of COVID-19 relies on a team of student curators to tag materials. This article summarizes an analysis of metadata tags, and describes strategies that improved the quantity and quality of metadata tags in the collection.
AmidonChristopher M.ScardinoPatriciaBlackGary. 2006. “Methods, Systems, and Products for Tagging Files.” Patent, Washington, DC, 1–13.
2.
BailarMelissa. 2011. “The Humanities Student as Digital Archivist: Pedagogical Opportunities in the Our Americas Archive Partnership.” Transformations: The Journal of Inclusive Scholarship and Pedagogy22 (1): 80–91.
3.
BowkerGeoffrey C.StarSusan Leigh. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT Press, 33–50.
4.
BruceThomas R.HillmannDiane. 2004. “The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting.” In Metadata in Practice, edited by HillmannDianeWestbrooksElaine L., 238–56. Chicago: American Library Association.
5.
BullardJulia. 2018. “Curated Folksonomies: Three Implementations of Structure through Human Judgment.” Knowledge Organization45 (8): 643–52.
6.
CoccioloAnthony. 2011. “Situating Student Learning in Rich Contexts: A Constructionist Approach to Digital Archives Education.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice6 (3): 4–15.
7.
EcharteFranciscoAstrainJoséCórdobaAlbertoVilladangosJesús. 2007. “Ontology of Folksonomy: A New Modeling Method.” Proceedings of the Semantic Authoring, Annotation and Knowledge Markup Workshop, 4th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 1–8, Whistler, BC, canada–.
8.
FlinnAndrewSextonAnna. 2019. “Activist Participatory Communities in Archival Contexts: Theoretical Perspectives.” In Participatory Archives Theory and Practice, edited by BenoitEdwardIIIEveleighAlexandra, 173–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Gaona-GarcíaPaulo AlonsoFermoso-GarcíaAnaSánchez-AlonsoSalvator. 2017. “Exploring the Relevance of Europeana Digital Resources: Preliminary Ideas on Europeana Metadata Quality.” Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología40 (1): 59–69. doi:10.17533/udea.rib.v40n1a06.
10.
GolderScott A.HubermanBernardo A.2006. “Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems.” Journal of Information Science32 (2): 198–208. doi:10.1177/0165551506062337.
HuvilaIsto. 2008. “Participatory Archive: Towards Decentralized Curation, Radical User Orientation, and Broader Contextualization of Records Management.” Archival Science8 (1): 15–36.
13.
KirályPéterBüchlerMarco. 2018. “Measuring Completeness as Metadata Quality Metric in Europeana.” 3rd Computational Archival Science workshop, IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Seattle, WA, December 10–13, 2711–20. New York: IEEE. doi:10.1109/BigData.2018.8622487.
14.
LustigJason. 2020. “Epistemologies of the Archive: Toward a Critique of Archival Reason.” Archival Science20: 65–89. doi:10.1007/s10502-019-09313-z.
15.
MaynorAshley R.2016. “Response to the Unthinkable: Collecting and Archiving Condolence and Temporary Memorial Materials following Public Tragedies.” In Handbook of Research on Disaster Management and Contingency Planning in Modern Libraries, edited by DeckerEmy NelsonTownesJennifer A., 582–624. Knoxville: University of Tennessee. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8624-3.ch025.
16.
McClurkenKara. 2016. “Digital Collecting for Events and Emergencies: Survey Analysis.” Report, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 1–22.
17.
MickKenneth MelbourneIII. 2019. “One Does Not Simply Preserve Internet Memes: Preserving Internet Memes Via Participatory Community-Based Approaches.” Master’s thesis, Brandenburg University of Technology, 2–84.
18.
MilesEllie. 2020. “Theme 4: Trauma and Distress.” In Contemporaneous Collecting: An Ethical Toolkit for Museum Practitioners, edited by MilesEllieCordnerSusannaKavanaghJen, 22–30. London: London Transport Museum.
ParkJung-ran. 2006. “Semantic Interoperability and Metadata Quality: An Analysis of Metadata Item Records of Digital Image Collections.” Knowledge Organization33 (1): 20–31.
22.
PooleAlex H.2019. “Social Tagging and Commenting in Participatory Archives: A Critical Literature Review.” In Participatory Archives: Theory and Practice, edited by BenoitEdwardIIIEvelieghAlexandra, 15–32. London: Facet Publishing.
23.
RoeschleyAna. 2019. “Something that Feels Like a Community: The Role of Oersonal Stories in Building Community-Based Participatory Archives.” Archival Science19: 27–49.
24.
SchwartzPamBroadawayWhitneyArnoldEmilie S.WareAdam M.DomingoJessica. “Rapid-Response Collecting after the Pulse Nightclub Massacre.” The Public Historian40 (1): 105–14.
25.
ShibayamaA.BoretS.2019. “Transforming the Archives of the Great East Japan Earthquake into Global Natural Disaster Archives.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science2731–6.
26.
SpindlerRobert P.2014. “An Evaluation of Crowdsourcing and Participatory Archives Projects for Archival Description and Transcription.” Research Paper. Tempe, Arizona. https://repository.asu.edu/items/25327.
27.
SteinAylaApplegateKelly J.RobbinsSeth. 2017. “Achieving and Maintaining Metadata Quality: Toward a Sustainable Workflow for the IDEALS Institutional Repository.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly55 (7–8): 644–66. doi:10.1080/01639374.2017.1358786.
StviliaBesikiGasserLesTwidaleMichael B.2006. “Metadata Quality Problems in Federated Collections.” In Challenges of Managing Information Quality in Service Organizations, edited by Al-HakimLatif, 154–86. Hershey: Idea Group–.
30.
TindalBrenda. 2018. “K(NO)W Justice K(NO)W Peace: The Making of a Rapid-Response Community Exhibit.” The Public Historian40 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1525/tph.2018.40.1.87.
31.
TrantJulie. 2009. “Studying Social Tagging and Folksonomy: A Review and Framework.” Journal of Digital Information, Special Issue on Digital Libraries and User-Generated Content10 (1): 2–24.
