How Are Decisions to Introduce New Surgical Technologies Made? Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery at a Canadian Community Hospital: A Qualitative Case Study and Evaluation

Abstract

The introduction of many new surgical technologies is associated with increased costs and uncertainty regarding risks and benefits. Currently, little is known about how decisions are made regarding the adoption of surgical innovations. To study the decision-making process for adoption of advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures at a community hospital in Toronto, Canada, we used qualitative case study methods. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews with key informants. We performed a modified thematic analysis of the data, using the conceptual framework for priority setting known as accountability for reasonableness, which consists of 4 conditions: relevance, publicity, appeals, and enforcement. Several advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures were introduced at the hospital between 2000 and 2005. During that time, there was no structured, explicit process for making decisions about introducing new surgical technologies. Use of the new surgical technologies was relevant, as measured by the perception of patient benefit and alignment with the hospital’s strategic priorities. There was no systematic structure in place to oversee publicity, appeals, or enforcement. The decision to adopt advanced laparoscopic surgery at a community hospital in Toronto, Canada, was made primarily on the basis of its relevance to patient care. The process for making decisions about the adoption of new surgical technologies can be improved.

Keywords

priority setting health technology assessment qualitative methods laparoscopic surgery case study accountability for reasonableness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Soper NJ , Brunt LM , Kerbl K . Laparoscopic general surgery. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:409-419.

Daniels N , Sabin J . The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Aff. 1998;17:50-64.

Wilson CB . Adoption of new surgical technology. BMJ. 2006;332:112-114.

Daniels N , Sabin JE . Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Pub Aff. 1997;26:303-350.

Ham C . Tragic choices in health care: lessons from the child B case. BMJ. 1999;319:1258-1261.

Singer PA , Martin DK , Giacomini M , Purdy L . Priority setting for new technologies in medicine: qualitative case study. BMJ. 2000;321:1316-1318.

Daniels N , Sabin JE . Setting Limits Fairly: Can we Learn to Share Medical Resources? New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.

Yin RK . Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994.

Creswell JW . Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.

10.

North York General Hospital , 2001-2002 Annual Report to the Community. 2002.

11.

Endacott R , Botti M . Clinical research 3: sample selection. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2005;21:51-55.

12.

Strauss A , Corbin J . Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures of Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.

13.

Denzin NK . Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2000.

14.

Martin DK , Hollenberg D , MacRae S , Madden S , Singer P . Priority setting in a hospital drug formulary: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy. 2003; 66: 295-303.

15.

Gibson JL , Martin DK , Singer PA . Setting priorities in health care organizations: criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:25-25.

16.

Martin DK , Singer PA . Priority setting for health technologies in Canada. In: Ham C , Roberts G , eds. Reasonable Rationing: International Experience of Priority Setting in Health Care. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press; 2003;42-63.

17.

Meakins JL . Innovation in surgery: the rules of evidence. Am J Surg. 2002;183:399-405.

18.

Martin DK , Walton N , Singer PA . Priority setting in surgery: improve the process and share the learning. World J Surg. 2003;27:962-966.

19.

Martin D , Abelson J , Singer PA . Participation in health care priority-setting through the eyes of the participants. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002;7:222-229.

20.

Martin DK , Giacomini M , Singer PA . Fairness, accountability for reasonableness, and the views of priority setting decision makers. Health Policy. 2002;61:279-290.

21.

Madden S , Martin DK , Downey S , Singer PA . Hospital priority setting with an appeals process: a qualitative case study and evaluation. Health Policy. 2005;73:10-20.