The Effect of Direct-From-Recovery Room Discharge of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients on Recovery Room Workload

Abstract

Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy pathways move patients through the hospital without encountering delays caused by congested inpatient bed units. However, redirecting patients to a direct discharge pathway might not be beneficial if recovery capacity is further taxed by additional workload. In this study, we attempt to assess the operational impact on recovery room workload of directly discharging laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients to home. We conducted a retrospective case-control review of recovery room flow sheets to determine recovery room time and effort required for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. The study was restricted to patients of a single surgeon to minimize confounds from surgical technique. Fifty-seven case patients (May 1, 2004, through November 30, 2004), all managed with intent to directly discharge from the recovery room, were compared with control patients (n = 81) from the corresponding 6 months in the year before the direct-discharge plan. The times (mean; 95% confidence interval) to meet objective criteria for adequate pain control (3.5 minutes [2.1 to 5.9] versus 4.0 minutes [2.6 to 6.1]) and readiness for discharge from phase 1 recovery (8.1 minutes [4.8 to 13.6] versus 6.1 minutes [4.0 to 9.5]) were not different between the groups. The number and distribution of interventions documented in the recovery process were not different between groups, nor was there a difference in recovery room length of stay (158 minutes [138 to 182] versus 149 minutes [132 to 167]). In our study, recovery room records reveal little if any increased workload associated with the direct-to-home discharge of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients.

Keywords

ambulatory surgery perioperative systems design OR economics laparoscopic cholecystectomy PACU workload

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sandberg WS , Canty T , Sokal SM , Daily B , Berger DL . Financial and operational impact of a direct-from-PACU discharge pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Surgery. 2006;140:372-378.

Friedman DM , Sokal SM , Chang Y , Berger DL . Increasing operating room efficiency through parallel processing. Ann Surg. 2006;243:10-14.

Meyer MA , Sokal SM , Sandberg W , Chang Y , Daily B , Berger DL . INCOMING!—A web tracking application for PACU and post-surgical patients. J Surg Res. 2006; 132:153-158.

Sandberg WS , Daily B , Egan M , et al. Deliberate perioperative systems design improves operating room throughput. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:406-418.

Sandberg WS , Ganous TJ , Steiner C . Setting a research agenda for perioperative systems design. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10:57-70.

Seim AR , Andersen B , Sandberg WS . Statistical process control as a tool for monitoring non-operative time. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:370-380.

Sokal SM , Craft DL , Chang Y , Sandberg WS , Berger DL . Maximizing operating room and recovery room capacity in an era of constrained resources. Arch Surg. 2006;141: 389-393; discussion 393-395.

Stahl JE , Egan MT , Goldman JM , et al. Introducing new technology into the operating room: measuring the impact on job performance and satisfaction. Surgery. 2005;137: 518-526.

Stahl JE , Rattner D , Wiklund R , Lester J , Beinfeld M , Gazelle GS . Reorganizing the system of care surrounding laparoscopic surgery: a cost-effectiveness analysis using discrete-event simulation. Med Decis Making. 2004; 24:461-471.

10.

Stahl JE , Sandberg WS , Daily B , et al. Reorganizing patient care and workflow in the operating room: a cost-effectiveness study. Surgery. 2006;139:717-728.

11.

Strum DP , May JH , Vargas LG . Modeling the uncertainty of surgical procedure times: comparison of log-normal and normal models. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1160-1167.

12.

Aldrete JA , Kroulik D . A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:924-934.

13.

Fredman B , Sheffer O , Zohar E , et al. Fast-track eligibility of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic surgery procedures. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:560-564; table of contents.