Telementoring for Minimally Invasive Surgical Training by Wireless Robot

Abstract

Hands-on training courses with local mentoring are excellent educational tools in laparoscopic surgery; however, the need for the physical presence of specialized instructors represents a limitation because of costs, time, and geographic constraints. Remote robotic telementoring using a wireless videoconferencing mobile robot could represent an alternative to local instruction. The authors compare local active and passive mentoring with remote robotic telementoring using the wireless RP-6 Robot that worked through a WiFi 802.11b connection during a hands-on laparoscopic training session. Surgeons were mentored once in France from the United States. Robot mentoring was well received and appreciated (assessment score of 2.65; scale, 0 to 4). There was no statistical difference in the different mentoring sessions (active, passive, and remote). Mobile wireless robot is a valuable tool in laparoscopic telementoring. Robotic-assisted telementoring may not replace onsite mentoring, but it may enhance educational opportunities and the quality of hands-on training courses by implementing tutoring with expert assistance from remote locations.

Keywords

education surgery robot training laparoscopy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Olinger A. , Pistorius G. , Lindemann W. , Vollmar B. , Hildebrandt U. , Menger MD Effectiveness of a hands-on training course for laparoscopic spine surgery in a porcine model. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:118-122.

Wolfe BM , Szabo Z. , Moran ME , Chan P. , Hunter JG Training for minimally invasive surgery: need for surgical skills. Surg Endosc. 1993;7:93-95.

Deziel DJ , Millikan KW , Economou SG , Doolas A. , Ko ST , Airan MC Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993;165:9-14.

Moore RG , Adams JB , Partin AW , Docimo SG , Kavoussi LR Telementoring of laparoscopic procedures: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1996;10:107-110.

Schulam PG , Docimo SG , Saleh W. , Breitenbach C. , Moore RG , Kavoussi L. Telesurgical mentoring: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1001-1005.

Ballantyne GH Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1389-1402.

Eadie LH , Seifalian AM , Davidson BR Telemedicine in surgery. Br J Surg. 2003;90:647-658.

Marescaux J. , Rubino F. Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery, and telerobotics. Curr Urol Rep. 2003;4: 109-113.

Latifi R. , Peck K. , Satava R. , Anvari M. Telepresence and telementoring in surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;104:200-206.

10.

Lee BR , Moore R. International telementoring: a feasible method of instruction. World J Urol. 2000;18:296-298.

11.

Cubano M. , Poulose BK , Talamini MA , et al. Long distance telementoring: a novel tool for laparoscopy aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln. Surg Endosc. 1999 ;13:673-678.

12.

Link RE , Schulam PG , Kavoussi LR Telesurgery: remote monitoring and assistance during laparoscopy. Urol Clin North Am. 2001; 28:177-188.

13.

Emken JL , Mcdougall EM , Clayman RV Training and assessment of laparoscopic skills. JSLS. 2004;8:195-199.

14.

Guidelines for the surgical practice of telemedicine: Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons. Surg Endosc . 2000;14:975-979.

15.

Friedman AA , Zibit M. , Coote M. Telementoring as a collaborative agent for change. J Tech Learn Ass. 2004;3: 1-41.

16.

Zhang C. Robot “nurse” puts a human face on elderly health care. The Salt Lake Tribune. June 19, 2003.

17.

Stephenson G. Dr Robot tested at Hopkins. Johns Hopkins Office of Communication and Public Affairs, Baltimore, MD: August 2003.

18.

Smith CD , Skandalakis JE Remote presence proctoring by using a wireless remote-control videoconferencing system. Surg Innov. 2005;12:139-143.