Evaluation of Acute Fixation Strength for Mechanical Tacking Devices and Fibrin Sealant Versus Polypropylene Suture for Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this comparative study is to evaluate the acute fixation strength of mechanical tacking devices and fibrin sealant against polypropylene suture for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Methods: Three metallic mechanical tacking devices (ProTack, Salute, EndoANCHOR), 4 absorbable tacking devices (AbsorbaTack, PermaSorb, I-Clip, and SorbaFix), and 2 types of fibrin sealant (Tisseel, Artiss) were compared with 0-polypropylene suture. Three constructs from each device or an amount of sealant sufficient to cover a 3 × 3 cm² area were used to affix a 4 × 3 cm piece of absorbable barrier-coated mesh (Proceed, Ethicon, Inc) to the peritoneal surface of porcine abdominal wall. Ten samples were completed for each fixation modality. Acute fixation strength was measured via a lap shear test on an Instron tensiometer. Results: Acute fixation strength was significantly greater for suture (59.7 7.2 N) compared with all laparoscopic tacking devices and to fibrin sealant (P < .001 for all comparisons). Protack (29.5 ± 2.8 N) was stronger than Absorbatack (13.2 ± 3.7 N; P = .029). Protack, Permasorb, SorbaFix, and I-clip were stronger than fibrin sealant (P < .05 for all comparisons). Conclusions: The acute fixation strengths of metallic or absorbable tacks as well as fibrin sealant are all significantly less than that achieved with polypropylene suture. These factors should be considered in selecting the type of mechanical fixation for patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Keywords

tacking devices laparoscopic ventral hernia repair fibrin sealant laparoscopic fixation fixation strength

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burger JQ , Luijendijk RW , Hop WCJ , Halm JA , Verdaasdonk EGG , Jeekel J. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg. 2004 ;240:578-585.

Heniford BT , Park A. , Ramshaw BJ , Voeller G. Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg. 2003 ; 238:391-399.

Vidovic D. , Jurisic D. , Franjic BD , Glavan E. , Ledinsky M. , Bekavac-Beslin M. Factors affecting recurrence after incisional hernia repair. Hernia. 2006;10:322-325.

Rosen M. , Brody F. , Ponsky J. , et al. Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. A five-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:123-128.

Pierce RA , Spitler JA , Frisella MM , Matthews BD , Brunt LM Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc. 2007 ;21:378-386.

van’t Riet M. , de Vos van Steenwijk PJ , Kleinrensink GJ , Steyerberg EW , Bonger HJ Tensile strength of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1713-1716.

Olmi S. , Scaini A. , Erba L. , Croce E. Use of fibrin glue (Tissucol) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:409-413.

LeBlanc KA , Whitaker JM , Bellanger DE , Rhymes VK Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patients. Hernia. 2003;7:118-124.

LeBlanc K. Incisional hernia repair: Laparoscopic techniques. World J Surg. 2005;29:1073-1079.

10.

Eriksen JR , Poornoroozy P. , Jorgensen LN , Jacobsen B. , Friis-Andersen HU , Rosenberg J. Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair . Hernia. 2009;13:13-21.

11.

Carbonell AM , Harold KL , Mahmutovic AH , et al. Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair . Am Surg. 2003;69:688-691.

12.

Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Health and Human Services PHS; 1996.

13.

Schug-Pass C. , Lippert H. , Köckerling F. Mesh fixation with fibrin glue (Tissucol/Tisseel) in hernia repair dependent on the mesh structure-is there an optimum fibrin-mesh combination?-Investigations on a biomechanical model. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395:569-574.

14.

Duffy AJ , Hogle NJ , LaPerle KM , Fowler DL Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model. Hernia. 2004;8:358-364.

15.

Karakousis CP , Volpe C. , Tanski J. , Colby ED , Winston J. , Driscoll DL Use of a mesh for musculoaponeurotic defects of the abdominal wall in cancer surgery and the risk of bowel fistulas. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181:11-16.

16.

Katkhouda N. , Mavor E. , Friedlander MH , et al. Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg. 2001;233: 18-25.

17.

Joels CS , Matthews BD , Kercher KW , et al. Evaluation of adhesion formation, mesh fixation strength, and hydroxyproline content after intraabdominal placement of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh secured using titanium spiral tacks, nitinol anchors, and polypropylene suture or polyglactin 910 suture. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:780-785.

18.

Topart P. , Vandenbroucke F. , Lozac’h P. Tisseel vs tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:724-727.

19.

Lovisetto F. , Zonta S. , Rota E. , et al. Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg. 2007;245:222-231.

20.

Olmi S. , Scaini A. , Erba L. , Guaglio M. , Croce E. Quantification of pain in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernioplasty identifies marked differences between prosthesis fixation systems. Surgery. 2007; 142:40-46.

21.

Lau H. Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242:670-675.