Background: This study sought to identify and provide preventative recommendations for potentially devastating safety violations in the operating room. Methods: A Medline database search from 1950 to current using the terms patient safety and operating room was conducted. All topics identified were reviewed. Three patient safety violations with potential for immediate and devastating outcomes were selected for discussion using evidence-based literature. Results: The search identified 2851 articles, 807 of which were directly related to patient safety in the operating room. Topics addressed by these 807 included infectious complications (26%), fires (11%), communication/teamwork (6%), retained foreign objects (3%), safety checklists (1%), and wrong-site surgery (1%). Fires, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery were selected for discussion. Conclusions: Although fire, gossypiboma, and wrong-site surgery should be “never events” in the operating room, they continue to persist as 3 common patient safety violations. This study provides the epidemiology, common etiologies, and evidence-based preventative recommendations for each.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000 .
2.
Rosenfield LK , Chang DSThe error of omission: a simple checklist approach for improving operating room safety. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:399-401.
3.
Caplan RA, Barker SJ, Connis RT, et al. Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Operating Room Fires. Anesthesiology. 2008 ;108:786-801.
4.
Bruley MESurgical fires: perioperative communication is essential to prevent this rare but devastating complication. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13:467-471.
5.
Daane SP, Toth BAFire in the operating room: principles and prevention. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:73e-75e.
6.
Rinder CSFire safety in the operating room. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol . 2008;21:790-795.
7.
Smith LP, Roy S.Fire/burn risk with electrosurgical devices and endoscopy fiberoptic cables . Am J Otolaryngol. 2008;29:171-176.
8.
Batra S., Gupta R.Alcohol based surgical prep solution and risk of fire in the operating room: a case report. Patient Safe Surg. 2008;2:1-3.
9.
Barker SJ, Polson JSFire in the operating room: a case report and laboratory study. Anesth Analg. 2001;93: 960-965.
10.
Emergency Care Research Institute.Only you can prevent surgical fires. https://www.ecri.org/Documents/Patient_Safety_Center/Surgical_Fires_Poster_E.pdf. Accessed November 16, 2010 .
11.
Wan W., Le T., Riskin L., Macario A.Improving safety in the operating room: a systematic literature review of retained surgical sponges. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22: 207-214.
12.
Cima RR, Kollengode A., Garnatz J., Storsveen A., Weisbrod C., Deschamps C.Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:80-87.
13.
Gawande AA, Studdert DM, Orav EJ, Brennan TA, Zinner MJRisk factors for retained instruments and sponges after surgery. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:229-235.
14.
Greenberg CC , Gawande AABeyond counting: current evidence on the problem of retaining foreign bodies in surgery? Ann Surg. 2008;247:19-20.
15.
Bani-Hani KE , Gharaibeh KA, Yaghan RJRetained surgical sponges. Asian J Surg. 2005;28:109-115.
16.
AORN Recommended Practices Committee.Recommended practices for sponge, sharps, and instrument counts. AORN J.2006;83:418-433.
17.
Greenberg CC , Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SR, Diaz-Flores R., Gawande AAThe frequency and significance of discrepancies in the surgical count. Ann Surg. 2008;248:337-341.
18.
Kaiser CW, Friedman S., Spurling KP, Slowick T., Kaiser HAThe retained surgical sponge. Ann Surg. 1996 ;224:79-84.
19.
Egorova NN, Moskowitz A., Gelijns A., et al. Managing the prevention of retained surgical instruments: what is the value of counting? Ann Surg. 2008;247:13-18.
20.
Sun HS, Chen SL, Kuo CC, Wang SC, Kao YLGossypiboma-retained surgical sponge. J Chin Med Assoc. 2007;70:511-513.
Macario A., Morris D., Morris S.Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. Arch Surg. 2006;141:659-662.
23.
Rogers A., Jones E., Oleynikov D.Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1235-1237.
24.
Clarke JR, Johnston J., Finley EDGetting surgery right. Ann Surg. 2007;246:395-405.
25.
Kwaan MR, Studdert DM, Zinner MJ, Gawande AAIncidence, patterns, and prevention of wrong-site surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141:353-357.
26.
Michaels RK , Makary MA, Dahab Y., et al. Achieving the National Quality Forum’s "Never Events": prevention of wrong site, wrong procedure, and wrong patient operations. Ann Surg. 2007;245:526-532.
27.
Wilson IH, Walker IATheatre checklists and patient safety [editorial]. Anesthesia . 2008;63:921-923.
28.
Zohar E., Noga Y., Davidson E., Kantor M., Fredman B.Perioperative patient safety: correct patient, correct surgery, correct side-a multifaceted cross-organizational, interventional study. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:443-447.
29.
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:491-499.
30.
Lingard L., Espin S., Whyte S., et al. Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13: 330-334.
31.
Christian CK , Gustafson ML, Roth EM, et al. A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room. Surgery. 2006;139:159-173.
32.
Lingard L., Regehr G., Orser B., et al. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team breifing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication . Arch Surg. 2008;143:12-17.
