Video recording of surgical procedures is an important tool for surgical education, performance enhancement, and error analysis. Technology for video recording open surgery, however, is limited. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the available literature regarding the various technologies used for intraoperative video recording of open surgery. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, and EMBASE databases. Two authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles, and those that satisfied the defined inclusion criteria were selected for a full-text review. A total of 2275 publications were initially identified, and 110 were included in the final review. The included articles were categorized based on type of article, surgical subspecialty, type and positioning of camera, and limitations identified with their use. The most common article type was primary-technical (29%), and the dominant specialties were general surgery (22%) and plastic surgery (18%). The most commonly cited camera used was the GoPro (30%) positioned in a head-mount configuration (60%). Commonly cited limitations included poor video quality, inadequate battery life, light overexposure, obstruction by surgical team members, and excessive motion. Open surgery remains the mainstay of many surgical specialties today, and technological innovation is absolutely critical to fulfill the unmet need for better video capture of open surgery. The findings of this article will be valuable for guiding future development of novel technology for this purpose.
GreenbergCCDombrowskiJDimickJB.Video-based surgical coaching: an emerging approach to performance improvement. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:282-283.
2.
GreenbergCCGhousseiniHNQuammeSRPBeasleyHLWiegmannDA.Surgical coaching for individual performance improvement. Ann Surg. 2015;261:32-34.
3.
HuYYPeyreSEArriagaAF,et al. Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:115-124.
4.
JooSXuTMakaryMA.Video transparency: a powerful tool for patient safety and quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:911-913.
5.
MakaryMAXuTPawlikTM.Can video recording revolutionise medical quality?BMJ. 2015;351:h5169.
6.
CatesJABonrathEMDedyNJGrantcharovTP.Development of a black-box data recording device in the operating room: a proof-of-concept study. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:S65.
7.
GoldenbergMGJungJGrantcharovTP.Using data to enhance performance and improve quality and safety in surgery. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:972-973.
8.
ShamseerLMoherDClarkeM,et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
9.
KolodzeyLGrantcharovPDRivasHSchijvenMPGrantcharovTP.Wearable technology in the operating room: a systematic review. BMJ Innov. 2017;3:55-63.
10.
WaxmanBP.Medicine in small doses. Google Glass: a new dimension in surgical education or just another gimmick?ANZ J Surg. 2014;84:810.
11.
SchreinemacherMHGraaflandMSchijvenMP.Google Glass in surgery. Surg Innov. 2014;21:651-652.
12.
DattaNMacQueenITSchroederAD,et al. Wearable technology for global surgical teleproctoring. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:1290-1295.
13.
HashimotoDAPhitayakornRFernandez-del CastilloCMeirelesO.A blinded assessment of video quality in wearable technology for telementoring in open surgery: the Google Glass experience. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:372-378.
14.
MuenstererOJLacherMZoellerCBronsteinMKüblerJ.Google Glass in pediatric surgery: an exploratory study. Int J Surg. 2014;12:281-289.
15.
DavisCRRosenfieldLK.Looking at plastic surgery through Google Glass: part 1. systematic review of Google Glass evidence and the first plastic surgical procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:918-928.
16.
ValenteDSEiflerLSCarvalhoLAFilhoGARibeiroVWPadoinAV.Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a pilot study. Plast Surg Int. 2015;2015:187505.
17.
DavisCRRosenfieldLK.Discussion: Google Glass in the operating room: the plastic surgeon’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:303-304.
18.
SinkinJCRahmanOFNahabedianMY.Google Glass in the operating room: the plastic surgeon’s perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138:298-302.
19.
ParoJAMNazareliRGurjalaABergerALeeGK. Video-based self-review. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:S71-S74.
20.
PonceBAMenendezMEOladejiLOFrybergerCTDantuluriPK.Emerging technology in surgical education: combining real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices. Orthopedics. 2014;37:751-757.
21.
MakhniECJobinCMLevineWNAhmadCS.Using wearable technology to record surgical videos. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44:163-166.
22.
RahimyEGargSJ.Google Glass for recording scleral buckling surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:710-711.
23.
LeeCKKimYLeeNKimBKimDYiS.Feasibility study of utilization of action camera, GoPro Hero 4, Google Glass, and Panasonic HX-A100 in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42:275-280.
24.
NakhlaJKobetsADe la Garza RamosR,et al. Use of Google Glass to enhance surgical education of neurosurgery residents: “proof-of-concept” study. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:711-714.
25.
SahyouniRMoshtaghiOTranDK,et al. Assessment of Google Glass as an adjunct in neurological surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:68.
26.
MoshtaghiOKelleyKSArmstrongWBGhavamiYGuJDjalilianHR.Using Google Glass to solve communication and surgical education challenges in the operating room. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2295-2297.
27.
BrewerZEFannHCOgdenWDBurdonTASheikhAY.Inheriting the learner’s view: a Google Glass-based wearable computing platform for improving surgical trainee performance. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:682-688.
28.
KantorJ.First look: Google Glass in dermatology, Mohs surgery, and surgical reconstruction. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:1191.
29.
NiamtuJIII. Google Glass: dermatologic and cosmetic surgery applications. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40:1150-1152.
30.
DickeyRMSrikishenNLipshultzLISpiessPECarrionREHakkyTS.Augmented reality assisted surgery: a urologic training tool. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:732-734.
31.
BorgmannHRodriguez SocarrasMSalemJ,et al. Feasibility and safety of augmented reality-assisted urological surgery using smartglass. World J Urol. 2017;35:967-972.
32.
KnightHMGajendragadkarPRBokhariA.Wearable technology: using Google Glass as a teaching tool. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015:bcr2014208768.
33.
MitrasinovicSCamachoETrivediN,et al. Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses. Technol Health Care. 2015;23:381-401.
34.
DickersonPGrandeSEvansDLevineBCoeM.Utilizing intraprocedural interactive video capture with Google Glass for immediate postprocedural resident coaching. J Surg Educ. 2019;76:607-619.
35.
FreemanJL.Video production of surgical techniques. J Otolaryngol. 1994;23:208-209.
36.
MackenzieCFXiaoY.Video techniques and data compared with observation in emergency trauma care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(suppl 2):ii51-ii57.
37.
KananiMKocyildirimECohenGBenthamKElliottMJ.Method and value of digital recording of operations for congenital heart disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2146-2149.
38.
KuritaHSakaiHNarikawaJ-N,et al. Intraoperative video monitoring with a wireless micro digital camera system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:717-719.
39.
SchneiderEBartlKDeraTBöningGWagnerPBrandtT.Documentation and teaching of surgery with an eye movement driven head-mounted camera: see what the surgeon sees and does. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:486-490.
40.
VockerothJBartlKPfanzeltSSchneiderE.Medical documentation using a gaze-driven camera. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;142:413-416.
41.
MuralaJSKSingappuliKSwainSKNunnGR. Digital video recording of congenital heart operations with “surgical eye.” Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1377-1378.
42.
ChangCYLindseyHS.Video recording the surgeon’s viewpoint cheaply: how we do it. Ear Nose Throat J. 2011;90:E4-E5.
43.
AtounEPradhanRLevyO.Simple inexpensive method for intraoperative video and audio documentation. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;95:611.
44.
SadriAHuntDRhobayeSJumaA.Video recording of surgery to improve training in plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:e122-e123.
45.
BergerAJGasterRSLeeGK.Development of an affordable system for personalized video-documented surgical skill analysis for surgical residency training. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:442-446.
46.
MatsumotoSSekineKYamazakiM,et al. Digital video recording in trauma surgery using commercially available equipment. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013;21:27.
47.
FryAMOrrRLPattersonADoyleP.Use of eyewear for high definition video recording in surgical training. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;52:983-984.
48.
WarrianKJKheraniAGooiAGooiP.Surgeons’ point-of-view video recording technique for scleral buckling. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa). 2014;34:2151-2152.
49.
BizzottoNSandriALaviniFDall’OcaCRegisD.Video in operating room: GoPro HERO3 camera on surgeon’s head to film operations—a test. Surg Innov. 2014;21:338-340.
50.
MahapatraPLeongE.Should we all join the YouTube generation?J Surg Educ. 2014;71:162.
51.
LiuYJBynumDKHultmanCS.Response to video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO 3+: patient privacy and compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;3:e573.
52.
BirnbaumFAWangABradyCJ.Stereoscopic surgical recording using GoPro cameras: a low-cost means for capturing external eye surgery. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:1483-1484.
53.
NairAGKamalSDaveTV,et al. Surgeon point-of-view recording: using a high-definition head-mounted video camera in the operating room. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2015;63:771-774.
54.
WarrianKJAshenhurstMGooiAGooiP.A novel combination point-of-view (POV) action camera recording to capture the surgical field and instrument ergonomics in oculoplastic surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31:321-322.
55.
KaramMDThomasGWKoehlerDM,et al. Surgical coaching from head-mounted video in the training of fluoroscopically guided articular fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:1031-1039.
56.
GiustoGCaramelloVCominoFGandiniM.The surgeon’s view: comparison of two digital video recording systems in veterinary surgery. J Vet Med Educ. 2015;42:161-165.
57.
LeeBChenBRChenBBLuJYGiannottaSL.Recording stereoscopic 3D neurosurgery with a head-mounted 3D camera system. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29:371-373.
58.
GravesSNShenaqDSLangermanAJSongDH.Video capture of plastic surgery procedures using the GoPro HERO 3+. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e312.
59.
BeardHRMarquez-LaraAJHamidKS.Using wearable video technology to build a point-of-view surgical education library. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:771-772.
60.
NicolaouMRowe-JonesJM.Modifying the GoPro Hero 4 for recording high definition video in the operating room. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69:e225-e226.
61.
VaraADWuJShinAYSobolGWiaterB.Video recording with a GoPro in hand and upper extremity surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:e383-e387.
62.
O’LearyDPDeering-McCarthyEMcGrathDWalshDCoffeyJC.Identification of the optimal visual recording system in open abdominal surgery—a prospective observational study. J Vis Commun Med. 2016;39:127-132.
63.
NahasSIeongELogishettyKMahapatraPNathwaniD.The use of personalized video training for orthopaedic surgeons. Musculoskeletal Care. 2016;14:180-184.
64.
MiyamotoS.Video capture of perforator flap harvesting procedure with a full high-definition wearable camera. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016;4:e765.
65.
KaramMDThomasGWTaylorLLiuXAnthonyCAAndersonDD.Value added: the case for point-of-view camera use in orthopedic surgical education. Iowa Orthop J. 2016;36:7-12.
66.
ChavesROde OliveiraPAVRochaLC,et al. An innovative streaming video system with a point-of-view head camera transmission of surgeries to smartphones and tablets: an educational utility. Surg Innov. 2017;24:462-470.
67.
HoVYShahVGYatesDMShahGK.GoPro HERO 4 black recording of scleral buckle placement during retinal detachment repair. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017;52:416-418.
68.
AveryMC.Intraoperative video production with a head-mounted consumer video camera. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(suppl 3):S2-S3.
69.
MackenzieCFPasleyJGarofaloE,et al. Head-camera video recordings of trauma core competency procedures can evaluate surgical resident’s technical performance as well as colocated evaluators. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1, suppl 1):S124-S129.
70.
BaekRMMyungY.Intraoperative, surgeon-view, high-definition video broadcasting in intraoral surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55:561-562.
71.
OrtensiAPanunziATrombettaSCattaneoASorrentiSD’OraziV.Advancement of thyroid surgery video recording: a comparison between two full HD head mounted video cameras. Int J Surg. 2017;41(suppl 1):S65-S69.
72.
HiranakaTNakanishiYFujishiroT,et al. The use of smart glasses for surgical video streaming. Surg Innov. 2017;24:151-154.
73.
KapiE.Surgeon-manipulated live surgery video recording apparatuses: personal experience and review of literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41:738-746.
74.
GargS.Stereoscopic surgical recording using GoPro cameras—reply. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:1484.
75.
TarpadaSPHsuehWDNewmanSBGibberMJ.Formation and assessment of a novel surgical video atlas for thyroidectomy. J Vis Commun Med. 2017;40:21-25.
76.
AlameddineMBEnglesbeMJWaitsSA.A video-based coaching intervention to improve surgical skill in fourth-year medical students. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:1475-1479.
77.
HamourAFMendezAIHarrisJRBironVLSeikalyHCôtéDWJ. A high-definition video teaching module for thyroidectomy surgery. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:481-488.
78.
AdinCARoyalKDMooreBJacobM.Hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization of a waterproof, high-definition video camera case for intraoperative imaging in veterinary surgery. Vet Surg. 2018;47:672-677.
79.
SharmaGAycartMAO’MaraL,et al. A cadaveric procedural anatomy simulation course improves video-based assessment of operative performance. J Surg Res. 2018;223:64-71.
80.
LandryECYongMPauwelsJChadhaNK.The use of video glasses improved learning of tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;117:12-16.
81.
YoungHL.Low-cost video equipment for surgical teaching. Med Educ. 1987;21:490-492.
82.
StebbingJFMortensenNJ.Use of the video-laparoscope to shed light on conventional pelvic dissection. Br J Surg. 1995;82:902.
83.
HardestyBE.Video coverage of the surgical event: equipment considerations. J Biol Photogr. 1995;63:39-42.
84.
RussellKMBroderickTJDeMariaEJKothariSNMerrellRC.Laparoscopic telescope with alpha port and aesop to view open surgical procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001;11:213-218.
85.
NakayamaHMasudaHFukuzawaM.Recording of surgery with two crane-type tripods and video cameras. Int Surg. 2004;89:217-220.
86.
RafiqAMooreJAZhaoXDoarnCRMerrellRC.Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg. 2004;239:567-573.
87.
KumarASPalH.Digital video recording of cardiac surgical procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1063-1065.
88.
CosmanPHShearerCJHughTJBiankinAVMerrettND.A novel approach to high definition, high-contrast video capture in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:533-535.
89.
ChenCMLeeKTShenYH.Simple method to record high-quality surgical videos. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;47:494.
90.
HorgmoØHDanielsenHE. A camera support for operating theatre videography. J Vis Commun Med. 2012;35:20-24.
91.
DemossPMurageKPTholpadySFrielMHavlikRJFloresRL.Low-cost, high-definition video documentation of corrective cleft surgeries using a fixed laparoscope. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:e58-e59.
92.
KimyonSPamukcuCMeteASaygılıO.A novel technique for surgical video recording and imaging: smartphone and selfie stick. Surg Innov. 2016;23:620-622.
93.
CelikoyarMMAslanCGCinarF.An effective method for videorecording the nasal-dorsal part of a rhinoplasty—a multiple case study. J Vis Commun Med. 2016;39:112-119.
94.
ChandrappaABNagarajPKVasudevanSNagarajAYJagadishKShahA.Use of selfie sticks and iPhones to record operative photos and videos in plastic surgery. Indian J Plast Surg. 2017;50:82-84.
95.
FrykmanPKFreedmanALKaneTDChengZPetrosyanMCatchpoleK.A study of VITOM in pediatric surgery and urology: evaluation of technology acceptance and usability by operating team and surgeon musculoskeletal discomfort. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:191-196.
96.
FrykmanPKDuelBPGangiAWilliamsJABerciGFreedmanAL.Evaluation of a video telescopic operating microscope (VITOM) for pediatric surgery and urology: a preliminary report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:639-643.
ParkMSBrockAMortimerVTausskyPCouldwellWTQuigleyE.GoPro Hero cameras for creation of a three-dimensional, educational, neurointerventional video. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30:561-565.
99.
TaylorBMyersEM.Initial gynecologic experience using the VITOM® HD Exoscope for vaginal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:S103.
100.
SoucisseMLBoulvaKSiderisLDroletPMorinMDubéP.Video coaching as an efficient teaching method for surgical residents—a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:365-371.
101.
de SierraCVGEstevez-CidFCuenca-CastilloJJ.High-definition video recording: taking sport technology to the operating room. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66:667-669.
XiaoYSchimpffSMackenzieC,et al. Video technology to advance safety in the operating room and perioperative environment. Surg Innov. 2007;14:52-61.
104.
JaberooMCSalehHA.A novel appliance for intra-operative filming of rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol. 2008;33:382-383.
105.
DriscollPJPaisleyAMPaterson-BrownS.Video assessment of basic surgical trainees’ operative skills. Am J Surg. 2008;196:265-272.
106.
AugestadKMLindsetmoRO.Overcoming distance: video-conferencing as a clinical and educational tool among surgeons. World J Surg. 2009;33:1356-1365.
107.
Video integration for 21st century. OR Manager. 2011;27:17-18.
108.
KucukerIKelesMKAydoğduIO.An easy and applicable method for capturing high-quality rhinoplasty videos: handle banded camcorder. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1082e-1084e.
109.
NagengastESRamosMSSarmaH,et al. Surgical education through video broadcasting. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1619-1621.
110.
MaamariRNVemuriSTaoJP.A modified action sports camera for high-quality and cost-effective oculofacial surgical videography. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;31:336-337.
111.
LinLK.Surgical video recording with a modified GoPro Hero 4 camera. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:117-119.
112.
HoBRkeinAMDonnellyHB.Novel camera mounting technique for dermatologic surgeries. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43:1195-1197.
113.
GlarnerCEHuYYChenCH,et al. Quantifying technical skills during open operations using video-based motion analysis. Surgery. 2014;156:729-734.
114.
BezemerJCopeAKorkiakangasT,et al. Microanalysis of video from the operating room: an underused approach to patient safety research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:583-587.
