The Role of Working Memory in Levels of Situation Awareness

Abstract

Situation awareness (SA) brings together theories in cognition to examine what an operator perceives, understands and predicts about their environment. Previous characterization of working memory (WM) influence in levels of awareness however is sparse and has several shortcomings, including how both WM and SA have been measured. In the current experiment, a factor analytic approach to WM was adopted based on performance on three different WM tasks. These factor scores were then related to SA which was measured over two forms of scenarios in a complex dynamic decision-making task. In one scenario, Level 1 SA was assessed, and the other assessed Level 3 processes implicitly. Findings from 99 participants indicate WM was unrelated to Level 1, but was related to Level 3 SA with the relationship strengthening with increasing task experience. These results refine and contribute to ongoing theory in the context of SA and dynamic task performance, and provide future directives to individual differences research in human factors.

Keywords

working memory situation awareness individual differences implicit measures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman

P. L.

(1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.

Ackerman

P. L.

Beier

M. E.

Boyle

M. O.

(2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Bedny

Meister

(1999). Theory of activity and situation awareness. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 3, 63–72.

Bleckley

M. K.

Durso

F. T.

Crutchfield

J. M.

Engle

R. W.

Khanna

M. M.

(2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 884–889.

Brickman

B. J.

Hettinger

L. J.

Roe

M. M.

Stautberg

D.K.

Vidulich

M. A.

Haas

M. W.

Shaw

R. L.

(1999). The Global Implicit Measurement of situation awareness: Implications for design and adaptive interface technologies. In Scerbo

M. W.

Mouloua

(Eds.), Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp. 60–64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Burke

J. L.

Murphy

R. R.

(2004). Human-robot interaction in USAR technical search: Two heads are better than one. In Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 307–312). New York, NY: IEEE.

Carretta

T. R.

Perry

D. C.

Ree

M. J.

(1996). Prediction of situational awareness in F-15 pilots. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 21–41.

Colom

Rubio

V. J.

Shih

P. C.

Santacreu

(2006). Fluid intelligence, working memory and executive functioning. Psicothema, 18, 816–821.

10.

Crandall

J. W.

Cummings

M. L.

(2007). Developing performance metrics for the supervisory control of multiple robots. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robotic Interaction (pp. 33–40). New York. Association for Computing Machinery.

11.

Daneman

Carpenter

P. A.

(1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

12.

Drury

Scholtz

Yanco

(2003). Awareness in human-robot interactions. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 111–119). New York, NY: IEEE.

13.

Durso

F. T.

Bleckley

M. K.

Dattel

A. R.

(2006). Does situation awareness add to the validity of cognitive tests? Human Factors, 48, 721–733.

14.

Durso

F. T.

Hackworth

C. A.

Truitt

T. R.

Crutchfield

Nikolic

Manning

C. A.

(1998). Situation awareness as a predictor of performance for en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 6(1), 1–20.

15.

Durso

F. T.

Sethumadhavan

(2008). Situation awareness: Understanding dynamic environments. Human Factors, 50, 442–448.

16.

Endsley

M. R.

(1988). Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In Proceedings of the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference (NAECON) (pp. 789–795). New York, NY: IEEE.

17.

Endsley

M. R.

(1993). Situation awareness and workload: Flip sides of the same coin. In Jensen

R. S.

Neumeister

(Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 906–911). Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.

18.

Endsley

M. R.

(1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65–84.

19.

Endsley

M. R.

(1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.

20.

Endsley

M. R.

(2000a). Direct measurement of situation awareness: Validity and use of SAGAT. In Endsley

M. R.

Garland

D. J.

(Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 147–173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

21.

Endsley

M. R.

(2000b). Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: A critical review. In Endsley

M. R.

Garland

D. J.

(Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 3–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

22.

Endsley

M. R.

Bolstad

C. A.

(1994). Individual differences in pilot situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 241–264.

23.

Engle

R. W.

Tuholski

S. W.

Laughlin

J. E.

Conway

A. R. A.

(1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

24.

Gonzalez

Thomas

R. P.

Vanyukov

(2005). The relationships between cognitive ability and dynamic decision making. Intelligence, 33, 169–186.

25.

Gonzalez

Wimisberg

(2007). Situation awareness in dynamic decision-making: Effects of practice and working memory. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1(1), 56–74.

26.

Gronlund

S. D.

Dougherty

M. R. P.

Ohrt

D. D.

Thomson

G. L.

Bleckley

M. K.

Bain

D. L.

. . . Manning

C. A.

(1997). The role of memory in air traffic control (Tech. Rep. DOT/FAA/AM-97/22). Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.

27.

Gugerty

L. J.

Tirre

W. C.

(2000). Individual differences in situation awareness. In Endsley

M. R.

Garland

D. J.

(Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 249–276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

28.

Jones

D. B.

Endsley

M. R.

(1996). Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 67, 507–512.

29.

Kane

M. J.

Conway

A. R. A.

Miura

T. K.

Colflesh

G. J. H.

(2007). Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622.

30.

Kane

M. J.

Hambrick

D. Z.

Tuholski

S. W.

Wilhelm

Payne

T. W.

Engle

R. W.

(2004). The generality of working-memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.

31.

Lavie

(2005). Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 75–82.

32.

Lavie

De Fockart

(1995). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 669–674.

33.

Norman

D. A.

(1980). The psychology of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.

34.

O’Brien

K. S.

O’Hare

(2007). Situation awareness ability and cognitive skills training in a complex real-world task. Ergonomics, 50, 1064–1091.

35.

O’Hare

(1997). Cognitive ability determinants of elite pilot performance. Human Factors, 39, 540–552.

36.

Omodei

M. M.

Wearing

A. J.

(1995). The Fire Chief microworld generating program: An illustration of computer-simulated microworlds as an experimental paradigm for studying complex decision-making behavior. Behavior, Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 303–316.

37.

Omodei

M. M.

Wearing

A. J.

(1998). Network Fire Chief (Version 1.0) [Computer program]. Bundoora, Australia: La Trobe University.

38.

Pew

R. W.

(2000). The state of situation awareness measurement: Heading toward the next century. In Endsley

M. R.

Garland

D. J.

(Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 33–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Pritchett

A. R.

Hansman

R. J.

(2000). Use of testable responses for performance-based measurement of situation awareness. In Endsley

M. R.

Garland

D. J.

(Eds.), Situation awareness analysis and measurement (pp. 189–209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

40.

Rabbitt

Banerji

Szymanski

(1989). Space Fortress as an IQ test? Predictions of learning and of practiced performance in a complex interactive video-game. Acta Psychologia, 71, 243–257.

41.

Rigas

Brehmer

(1999). Mental processes in intelligence tests and dynamic decision making tasks. In Juslin

Montgomery

(Eds.), Judgment and decision making: Neo-Brunswikian and process-tracing approaches (pp. 45–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

42.

Rodas

M. O.

Szatkowski

C. X.

Veronda

M. C.

(2011). Predicting an adequate ratio of unmanned vehicles per operator using a system with a mission definition language. In IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA) (pp. 159–162). New York, NY: IEEE.

43.

Salmon

Stanton

Walker

Green

(2006). Situation awareness measurement: A review of applicability for C4i environments. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 225–238.

44.

Schmiedek

Hildebrandt Lövdén

Wilhelm

Lindenberger

(2009). Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1089–1096.

45.

Shah

Miyake

(1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27.

46.

Smith

Hancock

P. A.

(1995). Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed consciousness. Human Factors, 37, 137–148.

47.

Sohn

Y. W.

Doane

S. M.

(2004). Memory processes of flight situation awareness: Interactive roles of working memory capacity, long-term working memory, and expertise. Human Factors, 46, 461–475.

48.

Sulistyawati

Wickens

C. D.

Chui

Y. P.

(2011). Prediction in situation awareness: Confidence bias and underlying cognitive abilities. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21, 153–174.

49.

Unsworth

Engle

R. W.

(2006). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 68–80.

50.

Unsworth

Heitz

R. P.

Schrock

J. C.

Engle

R. W.

(2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505.

51.

Unsworth

Shrock

J. C.

Engle

R. W.

(2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1302–1321.

52.

Vidulich

M. A.

Stratton

Crabtree

Wilson

(1994). Performance-based and psychological measures of situational awareness. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 65(5, Suppl.), A7–A12.

53.

Wickens

C. D.

(2008). Situation awareness: Review of Mica Endsley’s 1995 articles on situation awareness theory and measurement. Human Factors, 50, 397–403.

54.

Yanco

H. A.

Drury

(2004). “Where am I?” Acquiring situation awareness using a remote robot platform. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 2835–2840). New York, NY: IEEE.