This article discusses how genre-related procedural rhetorics might be employed in video games to (re)shape the way we think about history. The theoretical interpretation follows a postphenomenological line of inquiry in understanding how the sense of collective memory is shaped across playable environments. Through their medium-specific characteristics, historical video games define the nature of the representations through which history is brought to human experience and knowledge. However, collective memory should be understood neither as a process of recall nor as an aesthetics of historiophoty, but, rather, as a phenomenon of technological mediation: historical video games disclose the reality of the past as “a world to be remembered” and shape humans as “remembering subjects” in morally relevant ways. Therefore, video games based on history participate in the politics of remembrance and play a powerful role in the governance of mnemonic subjectivity by activating and reifying contingent norms of commemoration.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
2.
BaradK. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formation, 92, 56–86. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF:92.05.2017
3.
BarnierA.SuttonJ. (2008). From individual to collective memory: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Memory, 16(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701828274
4.
BazileJ. A. (2022). An “alternative to the pen”? Perspectives for the design of historiographical videogames. Games and Culture, 17(6), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221115393
5.
BergenJ. P.VerbeekP.-P. (2021). To-do is to be: Foucault, Levinas, and technologically mediated subjectivation. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00390-7
Bijsterveld MuñozA. (2022). National identity in historical video games: An analysis of how civilization V represents the past. Nations and Nationalism, 28(4), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12845
8.
BirknerT.DonkA. (2020). Collective memory and social media: Fostering a new historical consciousness in the digital age?Memory Studies, 13(4), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017750012
9.
BogostI. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. The MIT Press.
10.
BowmanN. D.VandewalleA.DaneelsR.LeeY.ChenS. (2023). Animating a plausible past: Perceived realism and sense of place influence entertainment of and tourism intentions from historical video games. Games and Culture, 19(3), 286–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231162428
BurgessJ.JonesC. (2022). Exploring player understandings of historical accuracy and historical authenticity in video games. Games and Culture, 17(5), 816–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211061853
FoucaultM. (1969). Archaeology of knowledge. Routledge.
22.
FriedrichA.MasonJ.MaloneJ. (2022). Rethinking explainability: Toward a postphenomenology of black-box artificial intelligence in medicine. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09631-4
23.
FunkensteinA. (1989). Collective memory and historical consciousness. History and Memory, 1(1), 5–26.
24.
GreenA. (2004). Individual remembering and “collective memory”: Theoretical presuppositions and contemporary debates. Oral History, 32(2), 35–44.
25.
HalbwachsM. (1992). On collective memory. The University of Chicago Press.
26.
HammarE. L.WoodcockJ. (2019). The political economy of wargames: The production of history and memory in military video games. In HammondP.PötzschH. (Eds.), War games: Memory, militarism and the subject of play (pp. 54–71). Bloomsbury.
27.
HeideggerM. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology. Indiana University Press.
HumeJ. (2010). Memory matters: The evolution of scholarship in collective memory and mass communication. Review of Communication, 10(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358591003632563
30.
IhdeD. (1995). Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Northwestern University Press.
31.
IntronaL. D.HayesN. (2011). On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Information and Organization, 21(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.001
32.
IntronaL. D.IlharcoF. M. (2004). The ontological screening of contemporary life: A phenomenological analysis of screens. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000503
33.
JankowskiF. (2022). Playing (against) the heritage: Absolutism and the French Revolution in French digital games before 2000. Games and Culture, 17(6), 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221109126
34.
KingseppE. (2007). Fighting hyperreality with hyperreality. History and death in World War II digital games. Games and Culture, 2(4), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007309533
35.
KleinK. L. (2000). On the emergence of memory in historical discourse. Representations, 69, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/2902903
36.
KudinaO. (2022). Speak, memory: The postphenomenological analysis of memory-making in the age of algorithmically powered social networks. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00972-x
37.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
38.
LatourB.WoolgarS. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
39.
LiN. (2020). Playing the past: Historical video games as participatory public history in China. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media, 27(3), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520967606
40.
MateiȘ (2015). Digital cultures of commemoration learning and unlearning history through video games. In DumitracheI.FloreaA.-M.PopF.DumitrașcuA. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on control systems and computer science (pp. 777–782). University Politehnica of Bucharest.
MisztalB. (2003). Theories of social remembering. Open University Press.
44.
MisztalB. (2010). Collective memory in a global age: Learning how and what to remember. Current Sociology, 58(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392109348544
45.
MochockiM. (2021). Heritage sites and video games: Questions of authenticity and immersion. Games and Culture, 16(8), 951–977. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005369
MukherjeeS. (2021). Crab-rangoons in Kyrat: (Re)writing South-Asian history in Far Cry 4. Games and Culture, 16(8), 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005240
48.
MykhailovD.LiberatiN. (2022). A Study of Technological Intentionality in C++ and Generative Adversarial Model: Phenomenological and Postphenomenological Perspectives. Foundations of Science.
49.
ObrejaD. (2022). Postphenomenology, kill cams and shooters: Exploring the code of replay sequences. Games and Culture, 18(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221090972
50.
O’ConnorP. (2019). The unanchored past: Three modes of collective memory. Memory Studies.
RejackB. (2007). Toward a virtual reenactment of history: Video games and the recreation of the past. Rethinking History, 11(3), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642520701353652
53.
RosenbergerR.VerbeekP.-P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In RosenbergerR.VerbeekP.-P. (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9–41). Books.
54.
SaberD.WebberN. (2017). This is our call of duty’: Hegemony, history and resistant videogames in the Middle East. Media, Culture and Society, 39(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716672297
55.
SchutK. (2007). Strategic simulations and our past: The bias of computer games in the presentation of history. Games and Culture, 2(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007306202
56.
SchwartzB. (1982). The social context of commemoration: A study in collective memory. Social Forces, 61(2), 374–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/2578232
57.
SchwarzA. (2020). History in video games and the craze for the authentic. In LorberM.ZimmermannF. (Eds.), History in games: Contingencies of an authentic past (pp. 117–136). Transcript.
ŠislerV.PötzschH.HannemannT.CuhraJ.PinkasJ. (2022). History, heritage, and memory in video games: Approaching the past in Svoboda 1945: Liberation and train to Sachsenhausen. Games and Culture, 17(6), 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221115402
60.
TomaE.RughinișC. (2016). Playing with her story. Representing femininity in historical video games. Proceedings of Playing with History 2016: DiGRA/FDG Workshop on Playing with History: Games, Antiquity and History.
Van den HeedeP. J. B. J. (2023). Replaying wartime résistance? Studying ludic memory-making in the open world game the saboteur. Games and Culture, 19(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231160904
63.
Van HouseN.ChurchillE. F. (2008). Technologies of memory: Key issues and critical perspectives. Memory Studies, 1(3), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698008093795
64.
VerbeekP.-P. (2001). Don Ihde: The technological lifeworld. In AchterhuisH. (Ed.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 119–146). Indiana University Press.
65.
VerbeekP.-P. (2005). What things do. Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
66.
VerbeekP.-P. (2008). Obstetric ultrasound and the technological mediation of morality: A postphenomenological analysis. Human Studies, 31(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-007-9079-0
67.
VerbeekP.-P. (2016). Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research. In FriisJ. K. B. O.CreaseR. P. (Eds.), Technoscience and postphenomenology: The Manhattan papers (pp. 189–204). Books.
68.
VerbeekP.-P. (2017). Designing the morality of things: The ethics of behaviour-guiding technology. In Van den HovenJ.MillerS.PoggeT. (Eds.), Designing in ethics (pp. 78–94). Cambridge University Press.
69.
VerbeekP.-P. (2020). Politicizing postphenomenology. In MillerG.ShewA. (Eds.), Reimagining philosophy and technology, reinventing Ihde (pp. 141–155). Springer.
70.
VerbeekP.-P. (2006b). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science Technology and Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905285847
71.
VerbeekP.-P. (2006a). Acting artifacts. The technological mediation of action. In SlobA.VerbeekP.-P. (Eds.), User behaviour and technology development. Shaping sustainable relations between consumers and technologies (pp. 53–60). Springer.
72.
VoorheesG. A. (2009). I play therefore I am. Sid Meier’s civilization, turn-based strategy games and the Cogito. Games and Culture, 4(3), 254–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412009339728
73.
WagonerB. (2015). Collective remembering as a process of social representation. In SammutG.AndreouliE.GaskellG.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 143–162). Cambridge University Press.
74.
WangB.GaoZ.ShidujamanM. (2023). Meaningful place: A phenomenological approach to the design of spatial experience in open-world games. Games and Culture, 19(5), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120231171290
75.
WertschJ. V. (2004). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
WertschJ. V.RoedigerH. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16(3), 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
79.
WesselI.MouldsM. L. (2008). Collective memory: A perspective from (experimental) clinical psychology. Memory, 16(3), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701811813
80.
WilsonD.SicartM. (2010). Now it’s personal: On abusive game design. Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology, 40–47.
81.
WinnerL. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.
YaoS.ChenY. (2022). Reconstructing history and culture in game discourse: A linguistic analysis of heroic stories in honor of kings. Games and Culture, 17(7–8), 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211070890
84.
YoungA. (2021). The limits of memory in disavowed: Interference, military execution, and the dishonored dead. Games and Culture, 16(7), 932–946. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005233
85.
ZerubavelE. (1996). Social memories. Steps to a sociology of the past. Qualitative Sociology, 19(3), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393273
86.
ZerubavelE. (2003). Time maps. Collective memory and the social shape of the past. The University of Chicago Press.
