Encountering the Platform Game: Player Resistance Formations and the Reproduction of Consumption in Multiplayer Online Battle Arena Games

Abstract

The homogenized identity of game players provides fertile ground for platform studies to transcend the producer/consumer dichotomy and examine the process by which platforms shift the “labor–capital” contradiction. This study traces diverse player feedback triggered by grievances in the multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game Honor of Kings, interrogating the co-constitutive process between protracted resistance formations and the iterative refinement of gameplay mechanics. We propose the concept “reproduction of consumption” to foreground how users’ spontaneous acts become technologically mediated through algorithms into instruments of user proliferation. In contrast to other forms of game/labor, which we call labor or create within games, it exhibits the exploitative nature of unpaid labor in the sense of “playbor.” Thereby, extending resistance research to digital gaming, we argue that technologically mediated resistance formations constitute pivotal digital labor driving consumption reproduction in platform games, advancing critical understanding of how platforms shift labor–capital contradictions.

Keywords

platform studies game consumption digital labor labor-capital contradiction everyday resistance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baaz

Lilja

Schulz

Vinthagen

(2016). Defining and analyzing “resistance” possible entrances to the study of subversive practices. Alternatives, 41(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375417700170

Barad

(2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321

Cameron

L. D.

(2021). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547

Chew

M. M.

(2022). The significance and complexities of anti-corporate gamer activism: Struggles against the exploitation and control of game-worlds in 2000s China. Games and Culture, 17(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211042259

Chew

M. M. T.

(2023). Chinese gold-farming in the 2000s: Worker empowerment and local development through video games-based digital labor. Games and Culture, 18(6), 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221134459

Consalvo

(2009). Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. MIT Press.

Duggan

Carbery

McDonnell

Sherman

(2023). Algorithmic HRM control in the gig economy: The app-worker perspective. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22168

Duggan

Sherman

Carbery

McDonnell

(2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258

Ferrari

Graham

(2021). Fissures in algorithmic power: Platforms, code, and contestation. Cultural Studies, 35(4-5), 814–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2021.1895250

10.

Fickle

(2021). Made in China: Gold farming as alternative history of esports. ROMchip, 3(1). https://www.romchip.org/index.php/romchip-journal/article/view/132

11.

Foucault

(2007). Security, territory, population lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Fratini

Hemer

S. R.

Chur-Hansen

(2022). Peeking behind the curtains: Exploring death and the body through patchwork ethnography. Anthropology in Action, 29(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2022.290301

13.

Friedman

(2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03

14.

Galloway

A. R.

(2004). Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. The MIT Press.

15.

Gandini

(2021). Digital labour: An empty signifier? Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720948018

16.

Hollander

J. A.

Einwohner

R. L.

(2004, December). Conceptualizing resistance. In Sociological forum (Vol. 19, pp. 533–554). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.

17.

Honor of Kings. (2016, November 15). [Announcement of non-stop updates across the entire server from November 15th]. Honor of Kings Official Website. https://pvp.qq.com/webplat/info/news_version3/15592/24091/24092/24095/m15241/201611/523116.shtm

18.

Honor of Kings. (2018a, April 8). [Fate Contract 2018 55 Gang up Festival Special Edition]. Honor of Kings Official Website. https://pvp.qq.com/cp/a20180409destinybond/index.htm

19.

Honor of Kings. (2018b, July 1). [This wave of environmental optimization revealed that Mr. Di posted a message for you]. Honor of Kings Sina Weibo. https://weibo.com/ttarticle/p/show?id=2309404257081678012947

20.

Honor of Kings. (2023, January 8). [Seriously disrupting the jungler gets you kicked from the game? AI takes over the match and deducts 12 points from your rating]. Honor of Kings Official Website. https://pvp.qq.com/web201706/newsdetail.shtml?tid=590352

21.

Honor of Kings operations team. (2017, April 26). [The big revelation of the carnival event “55 Black Festival”]. Honor of Kings Official Website. https://pvp.qq.com/webplat/info/news_version3/15592/24091/24092/24095/m15241/201704/577210.shtml

22.

Huang

(2025). Weapons of the riders: Everyday algorithmic resistance of migrant food-delivery workers in China's gig economy. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2025.2493883

23.

Hynes

(2013). Reconceptualizing resistance: Sociology and the affective dimension of resistance. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12038

24.

Jarrett

(2021). Gaming the gift: The affective economy of League of Legends “fair” free-to-play model. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993932

25.

Jarrett

(2014). The relevance of “women's work” social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413487607

26.

Jasper

J. M.

(1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press.

27.

Johansson

Vinthagen

(2016). Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analytical framework. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514524604

28.

Joseph

(2021). Battle pass capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993930

29.

Joseph

D. J.

(2018). The discourse of digital dispossession: Paid modifications and community crisis on Steam. Games and Culture, 13(7), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018756488

30.

Kellogg

K. C.

Valentine

M. A.

Christin

(2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174

31.

Koefoed

(2017). Constructive resistance in Northern Kurdistan: Exploring the peace, development and resistance nexus. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 12(3), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1366352

32.

Kücklich

(2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. The Fibreculture Journal, 5(1), 1–5.

33.

Le Breton

Galière

(2023). The role of organizational settings in social learning: An ethnographic focus on food-delivery platform work. Human Relations, 76(7), 990–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221081295

34.

Lee

Park

(2025, June). The rise of gamer-consumers: Anger, protests, and divisions in South Korean gamer activism. In Conference Proceedings of DiGRA 2025: Games at the Crossroads. Digital Games Research Association. https://doi.org/10.26503/dl.v2025i2.2481

35.

Lilja

(2018). The politics of time and temporality in Foucault's theorisation of resistance: Ruptures, time-lags and decelerations. Journal of Political Power, 11(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1523319

36.

Lilja

(2022a). The definition of resistance. Journal of Political Power, 15(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2061127

37.

Lilja

(2022b). Theorising resistance formations: Reverse discourses, spatial resistance and networked dissent. Global Society, 36(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2052020

38.

Lilja

Vinthagen

(2018). Dispersed resistance: Unpacking the spectrum and properties of glaring and everyday resistance. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1478642

39.

Liu

Huang

(2025). Emotional labor as a situated social practice: Investigating the performance of emotional labor by women migrant workers in China's platform-based gig economy. Gender & Society, 39(2), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251317160

40.

Manzerolle

(2010). Mobilizing the audience commodity: Digital labour in a wireless world. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(4), 455. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/11518

41.

Nealon

(2007). Foucault beyond Foucault. Stanford University Press.

42.

Nieborg

D. B.

(2015). Crushing candy: The free-to-play game in its connective commodity form. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115621932. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621932

43.

Nieborg

D. B.

Poell

(2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694

44.

Ortner

S. B.

(1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500019587

45.

Parent-Rocheleau

Parker

S. K.

(2022). Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838

46.

Parth

Bathini

D. R.

Kandathil

(2023). Actions in phygital space: Work solidarity and collective action among app-based cab drivers in India. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12223

47.

Poell

Nieborg

van Dijck

(2019). Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425

48.

Postigo

(2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society, 18(2), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541527

49.

Rietveld

Ploog

J. N.

Nieborg

D. B.

(2020). Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(3), 488–513. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0064

50.

Ryan

(2015). Everyday resilience as resistance: Palestinian women practicing sumud. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12099

51.

Schmidt

G. B.

Van Dellen

S. A.

(2022). Leadership of place in virtual environments. Leadership, 18(1), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150211045153

52.

Scott

J. C.

(1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.

53.

Scott

J. C

. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.

54.

Shutzberg

(2020). Literal tricks of the trade. The possibilities and contradictions of Swedish physicians’ everyday resistance in the sickness certification process. Journal of Resistance Studies, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.118

55.

Siles

Segura-Castillo

Solís

Sancho

(2020). Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the Global South. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720923377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377

56.

Sørensen

M. J.

(2016). Constructive resistance: Conceptualising and mapping the terrain. Journal of Resistance Studies, 2(1), 49–78. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-64349. https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.041

57.

Švelch

(2019). Resisting the perpetual update: Struggles against protocological power in video games. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1594–1612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819828987

58.

Taguchi

H. L.

(2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36

59.

Tassinari

Maccarrone

(2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954

60.

Thorhauge

A. M.

(2023). Games in the platform economy: Steam's tangled markets. Policy Press.

61.

Thorhauge

A. M.

(2024). The Steam platform economy: From retail to player-driven economies. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1963–1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221081401

62.

Thorhauge

A. M.

Nielsen

R. K.

(2021). Epic, Steam, and the role of skin-betting in game (platform) economies. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993929

63.

Vallas

Schor

J. B.

(2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857

64.

Van Dijck

Poell

De Waal

(2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

65.

Van Doorn

(2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194

66.

Vázquez

I. S.

Consalvo

(2015). Cheating in social network games. New Media & Society, 17(6), 829–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813516835

67.

Western Finance Media. (2025, August 15). [China's first game algorithm case goes to trial! Players demand that Honor of Kings disclose its matching mechanism, while Tencent defends itself on the grounds of “trade secrets.”] WeChat official account. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vz2PJeExH0rXWo3wNPZy4A

68.

Zanescu

French

Lajeunesse

(2021). Betting on DOTA 2's Battle Pass: Gamblification and productivity in play. New Media & Society, 23(10), 2882–2901. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820941381

69.

Zanescu

Lajeunesse

French

(2021). Speculating on Steam: Consumption in the gamblified platform ecosystem. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993928

70.

Zhang

Fung

A. Y.

(2014). Working as playing? Consumer labor, guild and the secondary industry of online gaming in China. New Media & Society, 16(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477077

71.

Zhao

(2025). “Ready worker two”: Gendered labor regime of platform-based game work in China. New Media & Society, 27(6), 3293-3313. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231222944

72.

Zhou

(2024). Digital labor in free-to-play games: Player as commodity and interaction as labor in MMOGs. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 41(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2024.2346226