In Bolivia, there is increasing interest in incorporating research ethics into study procedures, but there have been inconsistent application of research ethics practices. Minimal data exist regarding the experiences of researchers concerning the ethical conduct of research. A cross-sectional study was administered to Bolivian health leaders with research experience (n = 82) to document their knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of research ethics committees and infrastructure support for research ethics. Results showed that 16% of respondents reported not using ethical guidelines to conduct their research and 66% indicated their institutions did not consistently require ethics approval for research. Barriers and facilitators to incorporate research ethics into practice were outlined. These findings will help inform a comprehensive rights-based research ethics education program in Bolivia.
Comités o Comisiones de Ética de la Investigación en Bolivia y su importancia en los procesos de investigación [Research Ethics Committees or Comissions in Bolivia and their Importance in the Research Processes] [Powerpoint Slides] Personal collection of Jacqueline Cortez, Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia Ministerio de Salud y Deportes
3.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) and World Health Organization. (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva: CIOMS. Retrieved from http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
7.
GudynasE. (2010). La Pachamama: Ética ambiental y desarrollo [Mother Earth: Environmental and developmental ethics]. Le Monde Diplomatique, 27, 4-6.
8.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2012). Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda BOLIVIA Características de población y vivienda [Bolivia national population and housing census]. Retrieved from http://www.ine.gob.bo:8081/censo2012/PDF/resultadosCPV2012.pdf
JosiC. (2012). The recognition of diversity in the new Bolivian constitution: Reliance on traditional perspectives and respect of international law. Revista Juridica de la Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico, 47, 701.
Luna OroscoJ. (2011). POLÍTICA PLURINACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD, Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia [Plurinational Politics in Health Research]. PowerPoint presentation. La Paz, Bolivia: Ministerio de Salud y Deportes.
Pan American Health Organization. (2012b). Bolivia. Health in the Americas (County Volume, pp. 113-128). Silver Spring, MD: P.A.H. Organization.
16.
Republica de Bolivia, Asamblea Constituyente, Honorable Congreso Nacional. (2009). Constitución Política del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia [Constitution of Plurinational State of Bolivia] (pp. 1-100). Retrieved from http://www.ftierra.org/index.php/component/attachments/download/6
17.
SaenzC.HeitmanE.LunaF.LitewkaS.GoodmanK. W.MacklinR. (2014). Twelve years of Fogarty-funded bioethics training in Latin America and the Caribbean: Achievements and challenges. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 80-91.
18.
Schilling-VacaflorA. (2012). Bolivia’s new constitution: Towards participatory democracy and political pluralism? (GIGA Working Paper Series). Hamburg, Germany: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
19.
StrosbergM.GefenasE.FamenkaA. (2014). Research ethics review: Identifying public policy and program gaps. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(2), 3-11.
20.
SullivanS.AalborgA.LanzaO.CortezJ.BasagoitiaA.HathwayZ. (2014). Perspectives of Health Science students in research ethics in Bolivia. Manuscript in preparation, Public Health program, Touro University of California, Vallejo, CA.
Zwareva MashiriE. (2010). Los Comites de Etica de Investigacion Biomedica Y Psicosocial en Bolivia [Biomedical and psychosocial research ethics committees in Bolivia]. Acta Bioethica, 16(1), 87-91.
