The Significance of Benefit Perceptions for the Ethics of HIV Research Involving Adolescents in Kenya

Abstract

Assessment of benefits is traditionally regarded as crucial to the ethical evaluation of research involving human participants. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) with health and other professionals engaged with adolescents, caregivers/parents, and adolescents in Siaya County, Kenya, to solicit opinions about appropriate ways of conducting HIV research with adolescents. Our data revealed that many focus group participants have a profoundly positive conception of participation in health research, including studies conferring seemingly few benefits. In this article, we identify and analyze five different but interrelated types of benefits as perceived by Kenyan adolescent and adult stakeholders in HIV research, and discuss their ethical significance. Our findings suggest that future empirical and conceptual research should concentrate on factors that may trigger researcher obligations to improve benefit perceptions among research participants.

Keywords

research ethics benefits adolescents HIV/AIDS Kenya

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appiah-Poku

Newton

Kass

(2011). Participants’ perceptions of research benefits in an African genetic epidemiological study. Developing World Bioethics, 11, 128-135.

Beauchamp

T. L.

Childress

J. F.

(2012). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Bekker

L.-G.

Slack

Lee

Shah

Kapogiannis

(2014). Ethical issues in adolescent research in resource-limited countries. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 65, S24-S28.

Bernard

H. R.

(2012). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bromwich

Millum

J. R.

(2013). Disclosure and consent to medical research participation. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 12, 195-219.

Bromwich

Millum

J. R.

(2016). Informed consent to HIV cure research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43, 108-113.

Council of International Organizations for Medical Sciences. (2016). International guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Retrieved from http://cioms.ch/ethical-guidelines-2016/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf

Emanuel

E. J.

Wendler

Killen

Grady

(2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189, 930-937.

Faden

R. R.

Beauchamp

T. L.

(1986). A history and theory of informed consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

10.

Fatusi

A. O.

Hindin

M. J.

(2010). Adolescents and youth in developing countries: Health and development issues in context. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 499-508.

11.

Fitzgerald

D. W.

Marotte

Verdier

R. I.

Johnson

W. D.

Jr. Pape

J. W.

(2002). Comprehension during informed consent in a less-developed country. The Lancet, 360, 1301-1302.

12.

Gilson

Palmer

Schneider

(2005). Trust and health worker performance: Exploring a conceptual framework using South African evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1418-1429.

13.

Henderson

G. E.

Churchill

L. R.

Davis

A. M.

Easter

M. M.

Grady

Joffe

. . . Zimmer

C. R.

(2007). Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Medicine, 4(11), e324.

14.

Kamuya

D. M.

Theobald

S. J.

Munywoki

P. K.

Koech

Geissler

W. P.

Molyneux

S. C.

(2013). Evolving friendships and shifting ethical dilemmas: Fieldworkers’ experiences in a short term community based study in Kenya. Developing World Bioethics, 13(1), 1-9.

15.

King

N. M.

(2000). Defining and describing benefit appropriately in clinical trials. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 28, 332-343.

16.

King

N. M.

Churchill

L. R.

(2011). Assessing and comparing potential benefits and risks of harm. In Emanuel

E. J.

Grady

C. C.

Crouch

R. A.

Lie

R. K.

Miller

F. G.

Wendler

D. D.

(Eds.), The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics (pp. 514-526). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

17.

Koen

Slack

Barsdorf

Essack

(2008). Payment of trial participants can be ethically sound: Moving past a flat rate. South African Medical Journal, 98, 926-929.

18.

Krosin

M. T.

Klitzman

Levin

Cheng

Ranney

M. L.

(2006). Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa. Clinical Trials, 3, 306-313.

19.

Lairumbi

G. M.

Parker

Fitzpatrick

English

M. C.

(2011). Stakeholders understanding of the concept of benefit sharing in health research in Kenya: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 12, Article 20.

20.

Largent

(2017). For love and money: The need to rethink benefits in HIV cure studies. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43, 96-99.

21.

Levine

R. J.

(1988). Ethics and regulation of clinical research (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

22.

Lindegger

Milford

Slack

Quayle

Xaba

Vardas

(2006). Beyond the checklist: Assessing understanding for HIV vaccine trial participation in South Africa. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 43, 560-566.

23.

MacQueen

K. M.

Bahn

Frohlich

Holzer

Sugarman

Ethics Working Group of the HIV Prevention Trials Network. (2015). Evaluating community engagement in global health research: The need for metrics. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, Article 44.

24.

Maxwell

J. A.

Miller

B. A.

(2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In Leavy

Hesse-Biber

(Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461-477). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

25.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

26.

Molyneux

Mulupi

Mbaabu

Marsh

(2012). Benefits and payments for research participants: Experiences and views from a research center on the Kenyan coast. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, Article 13.

27.

National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP). (2016). Kenya HIV county profiles. Retrieved from http://nacc.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Kenya-HIV-County-Profiles-2016.pdf

28.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

29.

National Ministry of Health, Directorate General of Health Planning and Research, Research Directorate. (2008). National guidelines for ethical conduct of research involving human subjects. Retrieved from https://www.healthresearchweb.org/files/Final%20national%20ethical%20guidelines-last%20draft.pdf

30.

Ndebele

P. M.

Wassenaar

Munalula

Masiye

(2012). Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: An intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, Article 29.

31.

Ott

M. A.

Rosenberger

J. G.

Fortenberry

J. D.

(2010). Parental permission and perceived research benefits in adolescent STI research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(2), 57-64.

32.

Santelli

J. S.

Rogers

A. S.

Rosenfeld

W. D.

DuRant

R. H.

Dubler

Morreale

. . . Society for Adolescent Medicine. (2003). Guidelines for adolescent health research: A position paper for the Society for Adolescent Medicine. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 396-409.

33.

Singh

J. A.

Mills

E. J.

(2005). The abandoned trials of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: What went wrong? PLoS Medicine, 2(9), e234.

34.

Sreenivasan

(2003). Does informed consent to research require comprehension? The Lancet, 362, 2016-2018.

35.

Tindana

P. O.

Kass

Akweongo

(2006). The informed consent process in a rural African Setting: A case study of the Kassena-Nankana District of Northern Ghana. IRB, 28(3), 1-6.

36.

Vreeman

Kamaara

Kamanda

Ayuku

Nyandiko

Atwoli

. . . Braitstein

(2012). Community perspectives on research consent involving vulnerable children in Western Kenya. The Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 44-55.

37.

World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. (2016). Global HIV/AIDS update 2016. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/arv/global-AIDS-update-2016_en.pdf

38.

World Medical Association. (2013). WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB