Symptom Severity due to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Is Correlated With Radiographic Signs of Acetabular Retroversion but No Other Impingement Parameters
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Symptom Severity due to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Is Correlated With Radiographic Signs of Acetabular Retroversion but No Other Impingement Parameters
Radiographic assessment is central to the diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. However, the relationship between specific bony morphology and symptom severity remains unclear.
Purpose:
We sought to evaluate the relationship between FAI morphology, quantified through preoperative radiographic measures, and preoperative symptom burden in patients with FAI syndrome.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data that included a series of consecutive patients diagnosed with FAI syndrome who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon between January 2024 and October 2025. Inclusion criteria were (1) diagnosis of FAI syndrome and (2) availability of complete preoperative patient records, including X-ray images and preoperative patient-reported outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were (1) patients <14 or >60 years, (2) diagnosis that included FAI syndrome with concomitant intra-articular pathology, (3) hip surgery other than primary hip arthroscopy, (4) unavailable X-ray imaging, and (5) history of lower extremity osteotomy for abnormal rotational profile. Hip impingement measures were obtained on preoperative radiographs, including α angle, head-neck offset, anterior center-edge angle, and lateral center-edge angle, crossover sign, crossover ratio, and ischial spine sign. Preoperative symptom severity was assessed by the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12). Multivariate models adjusted for demographics, mental health, physical activity, and corticosteroid injection history.
Results:
Among 285 patients (median age 34.9 years, 75.4% female), the median iHOT-12 score was 37.5. Proximal femur measures and acetabular coverage were not correlated with iHOT-12. The presence of crossover or ischial spine signs was associated with higher iHOT-12 on bivariate analysis and remained predictive of higher iHOT-12 after adjustment for demographics and injection status in multivariate modeling. All other radiographic measures were non-significant after further adjustment for mental health and activity level.
Conclusion:
Radiographic measures of retroversion are associated with better preoperative symptoms in patients with FAI syndrome. Other radiographic measures of hip impingement showed no meaningful association with preoperative symptom severity. For patients with FAI syndrome, psychological and functional factors exerted a larger influence on symptom severity than did impingement severity as reflected on radiograph.
MurphyNJDiamondLEBennellKL, et al. Which hip morphology measures and patient factors are associated with age of onset and symptom severity in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?. Hip Int. 2023;33(1):102-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000211038550
CartonPFFilanDJ.The clinical presentation, diagnosis and pathogenesis of symptomatic sports-related femoroacetabular impingement (SRFAI) in a consecutive series of 1021 athletic hips. Hip Int. 2019;29(6):665-673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018825430
4.
Gómez-VerdejoFAlvarado-SolorioESuarez-AhedoC.Review of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2024;11(4):315-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae034
5.
AgricolaRvan BuurenMMAKempJLWeinansHRunhaarJBierma-ZeinstraSMA. Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in middle-aged individuals is strongly associated with the development of hip osteoarthritis within 10-year follow-up: a prospective cohort study (CHECK). Br J Sports Med. 2024;58(18):1061-1067. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2024-108222
6.
GriffinDRDickensonEJO’DonnellJ, et al. The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(19):1169-1176. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096743
7.
ClohisyJCBacaGBeauléPE, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a North American cohort of patients undergoing surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(6):1348-1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513488861
8.
MorrisWZLiRTLiuRWSalataMJVoosJE.Origin of cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(2):478-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517697689
9.
RheeCLe FrancoisTByrdJWTGlazebrookMWongI.Radiographic diagnosis of pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(5):2325967117708307. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117708307
10.
PalmerWE.Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): counterpoint-do not equate FAI morphology with FAI syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021;217(6):1297-1298. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26181
11.
FrankJMHarrisJDEricksonBJ, et al. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement imaging findings in asymptomatic volunteers: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(6):1199-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.042
12.
Morales-AvalosRTapia-NanezASimental-MendiaM, et al. Prevalence of morphological variations associated with femoroacetabular impingement according to age and sex: a study of 1878 asymptomatic hips in nonprofessional athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(2):2325967120977892. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120977892
13.
ShawCWarwickHNguyenKH, et al. Correlation of hip morphology with patient symptoms from femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(3):590-596. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24788
14.
RatcliffTLChhabraAOkparaSO, et al. Correlation of the imaging features of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with clinical findings and patient functional scores. Orthopedics. 2021;44(4):e577-e582. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20210618-20
GriffinDRParsonsNMohtadiNGSafranMR; Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):611-618.
17.
RumpfHJMeyerCHapkeUJohnU.Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard. Psychiatry Res. 2001;105(3):243-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1781(01)00329-8
MiltonKBullFCBaumanA.Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(3):203-208. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.068395
21.
MohtadiNGGriffinDRPedersenME, et al. The development and validation of a self-administered quality-of-life outcome measure for young, active patients with symptomatic hip disease: the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Arthroscopy. 2012;28(5):595-605; quiz 606-610.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013
22.
CuijpersPSmitsNDonkerTten HaveMde GraafR.Screening for mood and anxiety disorders with the five-item, the three-item, and the two-item Mental Health Inventory. Psychiatry Res. 2009;168(3):250-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.012
23.
ThorsenSVRuguliesRHjarsbechPUBjornerJB.The predictive value of mental health for long-term sickness absence: the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) compared. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-115
24.
O’HalloranPKingsleyMNicholsonM, et al. Responsiveness of the single item measure to detect change in physical activity. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0234420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234420
25.
KooTKLiMY.A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
26.
ClohisyJCCarlisleJCBeaulePE, et al. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(suppl 4):47-66. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00756
27.
OgataSMoriyaHTsuchiyaKAkitaTKamegayaMSomeyaM.Acetabular cover in congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72-B(2):190-196. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B2.2312554
28.
BanerjeePMcLeanCR.Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4(1):23-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-011-9073-z
29.
ImaiHKamadaTTakebaJShiraishiYMashimaNMiuraH.Anterior coverage after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(5):762-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-014-0592-5
30.
Ruiz SantiagoFSantiago ChinchillaAAnsariA, et al. Imaging of hip pain: from radiography to cross-sectional imaging techniques. Radiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:6369237. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6369237
31.
Diaz-LedezmaCNovackTMarin-PenaOParviziJ.The relevance of the radiological signs of acetabular retroversion among patients with femoroacetabular impingement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(7):893-899. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B7.31109
32.
LaborieLBLehmannTGEngesaeterIOEastwoodDMEngesaeterLBRosendahlK.Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology. 2011;260(2):494-502. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11102354
33.
van KlijPReimanMPWaarsingJH, et al. Classifying cam morphology by the alpha angle: a systematic review on threshold values. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(8):2325967120938312. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120938312
34.
WylieJDKapronALPetersCLAokiSKMaakTG.Relationship between the lateral center-edge angle and 3-dimensional acetabular coverage. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(4):2325967117700589. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117700589
35.
DornacherDLutzBFuchsMZippeliusTReichelH.Acetabular deficiency in borderline hip dysplasia is underestimated by lateral center edge angle alone. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(7):3937-3944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04652-6
36.
KingMGLawrensonPRSemciwAIMiddletonKJCrossleyKM.Lower limb biomechanics in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(9):566-580. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097839
37.
Bourget-MurrayJTanejaANaserkhakiS, et al. Computational modelling of hip resurfacing arthroplasty investigating the effect of femoral version on hip biomechanics. PLoS One. 2021;16(5):e0252435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252435
38.
LerchTDAntiocoTBoschungA, et al. Hip impingement location in maximal hip flexion in patients with femoroacetabular impingement with and without femoral retroversion. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(11):2989-2997. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221110887
39.
BoschungAAntiocoTNovaisEN, et al. Large hip impingement area and subspine hip impingement in patients with absolute femoral retroversion or decreased combined version. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(2):23259671221148502. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221148502
40.
NgKCGMantovaniGModeneseLBeaulePELamontagneM. Altered walking and muscle patterns reduce hip contact forces in individuals with symptomatic cam femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(11):2615-2623. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518787518
41.
SavageTNSaxbyDJLloydDG, et al. Hip contact force magnitude and regional loading patterns are altered in those with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54(11):1831-1841. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000002971
42.
LewisCLLoverroKLKhuuA.Kinematic differences during single-leg step-down between individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and individuals without hip pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(4):270-279. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.7794
43.
AlrashdiNZBrown-TaylorLBellMMIthurburnMP.Movement patterns and their associations with pain, function, and hip morphology in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a scoping review. Phys Ther. 2021;101(11):pzab185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab185
44.
HammoudSBediAVoosJEMauroCSKellyBT.The recognition and evaluation of patterns of compensatory injury in patients with mechanical hip pain. Sports Health. 2014;6(2):108-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738114522201
45.
GraceTSamaanMASouzaRBLinkTMMajumdarSZhangAL.Correlation of patient symptoms with labral and articular cartilage damage in femoroacetabular impingement. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(6):2325967118778785. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118778785
46.
KapronALAokiSKWeissJAKrychAJMaakTG.Isolated focal cartilage and labral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome may represent new, unique injury patterns. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(10):3057-3065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4861-2
47.
MengeTJBriggsKKDornanGJMcNamaraSCPhilipponMJ.Survivorship and outcomes 10 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: labral debridement compared with labral repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(12):997-1004. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01060
48.
GriffinDRDickensonEJWallPDH, et al. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10136):2225-2235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31202-9
49.
RiffAJKunzeKNMovassaghiK, et al. Systematic review of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the importance of labral repair and capsular closure. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):646-656.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.005
50.
GahleitnerMHoferDHochgattererRGotterbarmTKlasanA.Good mid-term clinical outcomes and low arthroplasty conversion rates after hip arthroscopy with labral debridement without refixation or reconstruction. J Clin Med. 2025;14(9):3236. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093236
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
