Both/And: Scholar-Activism as an Ethical Imperative

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brazzell

(2026). From taking to giving account: Narrative frameworks of accountability in transformative justice responses to gendered violence. Feminist Criminology, 21(3), 272–291.

Ortiz

(2026). If there’s no causal model, it’s just activism: An authoethnographic reflection of criminology’s rejection of the scholarvist model. Feminist Criminology, 21(3), 232–251.

Powell

Deckard

Malone Gonzalez

Battle

(2026). Abolition feminist storytelling as methodology: Lessons within the stories we (re)tell about punishment and violence. Feminist Criminology, 21(3), 252–271.

Rajah

Palmer

Dugan

(2022). The personal is political and so is discomfort: Intersectional, anti-racist praxis in feminist criminology. Race & Justice, 12(3), 548–568.

Shallenberger

A. N.

Bowman

S. W.

(2026). Not here to fit in: Criminology’s institutional contradictions and feminist scholar-activism. Feminist Criminology, 21(3), 214–231.

Suslovic

Rasmussen

(2026). “Now, who are your people?” affective solidarity as a feminist tool for criminological scholar-activism. Feminist Criminology, 21(3), 292–306.