Research on gang-related social media has focused overwhelmingly on boys and men, leaving girls’ and women’s online engagement underdeveloped. To address this gap, we examine women’s engagement on a public Facebook page dedicated to Latina/o gangs in Chicago. Drawing on 2,309 comments and replies posted between 2015 and 2016, we combine descriptive frequency coding of comment-level practices with thematic analysis to develop a typology of four engagement themes: Observational, Confrontational, Regulatory, and Adaptive. Findings highlight women’s strategic participation in a hypermasculine digital environment and extend scholarship by specifying how gender shapes online identity, conflict, and regulation.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. W.W. Norton & Company.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
3.
BudgeonS. (2014). The dynamics of gender hegemony: Femininities, masculinities and social change. Sociology, 48(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513490358
4.
Chesney-LindM. (1989). Girls’ crime and woman’s place: Towards a feminist model of female delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 35(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128789035001002
5.
Chesney-LindM.HagedornJ. M. (1999). Female gangs in America: Essays on girls, gangs, and gender. Lake View Press.
6.
DeckerS. H.PyroozD. C.DensleyJ. A. (2022). On gangs. Temple University Press.
EsbensenF. A.DeschenesE. P.WinfreeL. T.Jr (1999). Differences between gang girls and gang boys: Results from a multisite survey. Youth & Society, 31(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X99031001002
Fernández-PlanellsA.Orduña-MaleaE.Feixa PàmpolsC. (2021). Gangs and social media: A systematic literature review and an identification of future challenges, risks and recommendations. New Media & Society, 23(7), 2099–2124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821994490
11.
GorwaR.GuilbeaultD. (2020). Unpacking the social media bot: A typology to guide research and policy. Policy & Internet, 12(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.184
12.
Gutierrez-AdamsE.RiosD.CaseK. A. (2020). Female gang members negotiating privilege, power, and oppression within family and gang life. Women & Therapy, 43(3–4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1729474
13.
HsiaoY.LeversoJ.PapachristosA. V. (2023). The corner, the crew, and the digital street: Multiplex networks of gang online-offline conflict dynamics in the digital age. American Sociological Review, 88(4), 709–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224231184268
14.
HughesL. A.BotchkovarE. K.ShortJ. F. (2019). “Bargaining with patriarchy” and “Bad girl femininity”: Relationship and behaviors among Chicago girl gangs. Social Forces, 98(2), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz002
15.
JonesN. (2004). “It’s not where you live, it’s how you live”: How young women negotiate conflict and violence in the inner city. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 595(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204267394
16.
JonesN. (2008). Working ‘The code’: On girls, gender, and inner-city violence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 42(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.41.1.63
17.
JonesN. (2009). “I was aggressive for the streets, pretty for the pictures”: Gender, difference, and the inner-city girl. Gender & Society, 23(1), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243208326676
KolbA.PalysT. (2016). Homegirls, Hoodrats and Hos: Co-constructing gang status through discourse and performance. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i4.334
20.
LaneJ. (2016). The digital street: An ethnographic study of networked street life in Harlem. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215601711
21.
LaugerT. R.DensleyJ. A. (2018). Broadcasting badness: Violence, identity, and performance in the online gang rap scene. Justice Quarterly, 35(5), 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1341542
22.
LeversoJ.DensleyJ. A.InscoL. (2025a). Keeping it real: A signaling theory perspective on authentic claims of gang membership made on social media. Theoretical Criminology, 29(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/13624806241279280
23.
LeversoJ.HsiaoY. (2021). Gangbangin on the [Face]Book: Understanding online interactions of Chicago Latina/o gangs. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 239–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820952124
24.
LeversoJ.MatsuedaR. L. (2019). Gang organization and gang identity: An investigation of enduring gang membership. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(4), 797–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09408-x
25.
LeversoJ.O’NeillK. K.KnorreA.MohlerG. (2025b). The limits of digital liberation: The social locations of gang-affiliated girls and women in the digital streets. Journal of Criminal Justice, 96, 102344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102344
26.
MessserschmidtJ. W. (1995). From Patriarchy to Gender: Feminist Theory, Criminology and the Challenge of Diversity. In RafterN. H.HeidensohnF. (Eds.), International Feminist Perspectives in Criminology: Engendering a Discipline (pp. 167–188). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
27.
MillerJ. (1998). Gender and victimization risk among young women in gangs. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(4), 429–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427898035004004
28.
MillerJ. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs and gender: Oxford University Press.
29.
MillerJ. (2002). The strengths and limits of doing gender for understanding street crime. Theoretical Criminology, 6(4), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/136248060200600403
30.
MillerJ.BrunsonR. K. (2000). Gender dynamics in youth gangs: A comparison of males’ and females’ accounts. Justice Quarterly, 17(3), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094621
31.
MillerJ.DeckerS. H. (2001). Young women and gang violence: Gender, street offending, and violent victimization in gangs. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100094841
32.
OrabiM.MouhebD.Al AghbariZ.KamelI. (2020). Detection of bots in social media: A systematic review. Information Processing & Management, 57(4), Article 102250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102250
33.
PattonD. U.EschmannR. D.ButlerD. A. (2013). Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity, and hip hop. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.035
34.
PattonD. U.LaneJ.LeonardP.MacbethJ.Smith LeeJ. R. (2017). Gang violence on the digital street: Case study of a South Side Chicago gang member’s Twitter communication. New Media & Society, 19(7), 1000–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815625949
35.
PawelzJ.ElversP. (2018). The digital hood of urban violence: Exploring functionalities of social media and music among gangs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 34(4), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986218787735
36.
PetersonD. (2012). Girlfriends, gun-holders, and ghetto-rats? Moving beyond narrow views of girls in gangs. In LeveL. D.MillerS.KerigP. K. (Eds.), Delinquent girls (pp. 71–84). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0415-6_5
37.
PetersonD.CarsonD. C.FowlerE. (2018). What’s sex (composition) got to do with it? The importance of sex composition of gangs for female and male members’ offending and victimization. Justice Quarterly, 35(6), 941–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1424231
PetersonD.PanfilV. R. (2014). Street gangs: The gendered experiences of female and male gang members. In GartnerR.McCarthyB. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender, sex, and crime. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838707.013.012
40.
PetersonD.PanfilV. R. (2017). Toward a multiracial feminist framework for understanding females’ gang involvement. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2017.1341970
41.
PetersonR. D.HowellJ. C. (2013). Program approaches for girls in gangs: Female specific or gender neutral?Criminal Justice Review, 38(4), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016813510935
42.
PhippsC. (2022). “You belong in the kitchen”: Social media, virtual manhood acts, and women strength sport athletes’ experiences of gender-based violence online. Feminist Media Studies, 23(8), 4221–4237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2158898
43.
PrakashR. O.SamuelS.PartidaR.EchavezE.CrandallM. (2020). Images of women on social media: A comparison of four diverse Chicago neighborhoods. Violence and Gender, 7(3), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2019.0064
44.
PyroozD. C.DeckerS. H.MouleR. K.Jr (2015). Criminal and routine activities in online settings: Gangs, offenders, and the internet. Justice Quarterly, 32(3), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.778326
45.
QuinnK.PacellaM. L.Dickson-GomezJ.NydeggerL. A. (2017). Childhood Adversity and the Continued Exposure to Trauma and Violence Among Adolescent Gang Members. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1–2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12123
46.
RaffaelliM.OntaiL. L. (2004). Gender socialization in Latino/a families: Results from two retrospective studies. Sex Roles: Journal of Research, 50(5-6), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018886.58945.06
47.
Salerno-FerraroA. C.ErentzenC.SchullerR. A. (2022). Young women’s experiences with technology-facilitated sexual violence from male strangers. Journal of interpersonal violence, 37(19–20), NP17860-N17885. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521103001
48.
SobandeF.FearfullA.BrownlieD. (2019). Resisting media marginalisation: Black women’s digital content and collectivity. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 23(5), 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2019.1571491
49.
StorrodM. L. (2024). “It started with a nude”: Gangs & technology-facilitated sexual violence. International Criminal Justice Review, 34(3), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677241230475
50.
StorrodM. L.DensleyJ. A. (2016). ‘Going viral’ and ‘Going country’: The expressive and instrumental activities of street gangs on social media. Journal of Youth Studies, 20(6), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1260694
51.
StuartF. (2020). Code of the tweet: Urban gang violence in the social media age. Social Problems, 67(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spz010
52.
SuttonT. E. (2017). The lives of female gang members: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.10.001
53.
UrbanikM. M.BuceriusS. M. (2024). Women in gang research: An overview. In PyroozD. C.DensleyJ. A.LeversoJ. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gangs and society. Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197618158.013.28
54.
WangJ. Z. (2000). Female gang affiliation: Knowledge and perceptions of at-risk girls. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44(5), 618–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X00445008
55.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
56.
WorthenM. G.LeversoJ.HessC.HedgpethG. (2025). “Dude, you’re a Bitch!” gang members’ internet banging masculinity via Bitch discourse. Deviant Behavior, 47(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2025.2464182
