This study examines the use of irony in young men’s stories about romantic and sexual experiences. Because romantic experiences are central in the constitution of a heterosexual self, and because they are increasingly formulated in relation to traditional masculine norms and the simultaneous avowal and disavowal of effeminacy, they reveal an oscillation between complicity and resistance to hegemonic masculine norms. This oscillation is explored in stories about promiscuity, seduction, and vulnerability. Critical discursive analyses reveal how young men discursively pivot between complicity and resistance to traditional masculine norms, how this oscillation functions in the accomplishment of their romantic identities, how a sense of conventional masculinity is reclaimed, and what these processes reveal about the shifting nature of hegemonic masculinity in contemporary culture.
Allen, L. ( 2007). "Sensitive and real macho all at the same time." Young heterosexual men and romance. Men and Masculinities, 10, 137-152.
2.
Arnett, J.J. ( 2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bakhtin, M.M. ( 1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press .
4.
Benwell, B. ( 2002). Is there anything "new" about these lads? The textual and visual construction of masculinity in men’s magazines. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 149-173). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5.
Bird, S.R. ( 1996). Welcome to the men’s club: Homosociality and the maintenance of hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society , 10, 120-132.
6.
Brayton, S. ( 2007). MTV’s Jackass: Transgression, abjection, and the economy of White masculinity. Journal of Gender Studies, 16, 57-72.
7.
Brooks, G.R. ( 1997). The centerfold syndrome. In R. F. Levant & G. R. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex. New psychological perspectives (pp. 28-57). New York: John Wiley.
8.
Chu, J. ( 2004). A relational perspective on adolescent boy’s identity development. In N. Way and J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 78-106). New York: New York University Press.
9.
Clift, R. ( 1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society , 28, 523-553.
10.
Colston, H.L., & O’Brien, J. (2000). Contrast of kind versus contrast of magnitude: The pragmatic accomplishments of irony and hyperbole . Discourse Processes, 30, 179-199.
Connolly, J.A., & Johnson, A.M. ( 1996). Adolescents’ romantic relationships and the structure and quality of their close interpersonal ties. Personal Relationship , 3, 185-195.
13.
Demetriou, D. ( 2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique . Theory and Society, 30, 337-361.
14.
Dews, S., Kaplan, J., & Winner, E. ( 1995). Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony . Discourse Processes, 19, 347-367.
15.
Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. ( 1997). Jockeying for position: The construction of masculine identities. Discourse and Society, 8(2), 203-217.
16.
Feiring, C. ( 1999). Gender identity and the development of romantic relationships in adolescence. In W. Furman, B. Brown, & C. Feiring (Eds.), The development of romantic relationships in adolescence (pp. 211-232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Fine, M. ( 1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29-53.
18.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. ( 2002). Young masculinities: Understanding boys in contemporary society. London: Palgrave.
19.
Gibbs, R. ( 2000). Irony in talk among friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15, 5-27.
20.
Gilmartin, S.K. ( 2007). Crafting heterosexual masculine identities on campus. College men talk about romantic love. Men and Masculinities , 9, 530-539.
21.
Giora, R. ( 1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes , 19, 239-264.
22.
Grice, P.H. ( 1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts: Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic.
23.
Graber, J.A., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Galen, B.R. ( 1998). Betwixt and between: Sexuality in the context of adolescent transitions. In R. Jessor (Ed.), New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior (pp. 270-316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, D. ( 2006). Public intimacy: Dynamics of seduction in male homosocial interactions. Symbolic Interaction, 28, 571-595.
26.
Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. ( 1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine.
27.
Korobov, N. ( 2004). Inoculating against prejudice: A discursive approach to homophobia and sexism in adolescent male talk. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(2), 178-189.
28.
Korobov, N. ( 2005). Ironizing masculinity: How adolescent boys negotiate hetero-normative dilemmas in conversational interaction. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 13, 225-246.
29.
Korobov, N. ( 2006). The management of "nonrelational sexuality": Positioning strategies in adolescent male talk about (hetero)sexual attraction. Men and Masculinities, 8, 493-517.
30.
Korobov, N., & Bamberg, M. ( 2004). Positioning a "mature" self in interactive practices: How adolescent males negotiate "physical attraction" in group talk. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 22, 471-492.
31.
Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. ( 2006). Intimacy and distancing: Young men’s conversations about romantic relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research , 21, 27-55.
32.
Korobov, N., & Thorne, A. ( 2007). How late adolescent friends share stories about relationships: The importance of mitigating the seriousness of romantic problems. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 971-992
33.
Levant, R.F. ( 1997). Nonrelational sexuality in men. In R. F. Levant & G. R. Brooks (Eds.), Men and sex. New psychological perspectives (pp. 9-27). New York: John Wiley.
34.
Mahalik, J., Locke, B., Ludlow, L., Diemer, M., Gottfried, M., & Scott, R. ( 2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory . Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 4, 3-25.
35.
Messner, M., & Montez de Oca, J. (2005). The male consumer as loser: Beer and liquor ads in mega sports media events. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1870-1909.
36.
Moissinac, L. ( 2006). Prejudicial expressions in defense of adolescent masculine identities in interaction. Sex Roles, 55, 609-619.
37.
Pleck, J. ( 1995). The gender role strain paradigm. An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men (pp. 11-32). New York: Basic Books.
38.
Pollack, W.S. ( 1998). Real boys. Rescuing our sons from the myths of boyhood . New York: Random House.
39.
Redman, P. ( 2001). The discipline of love. Negotiation and regulation of boy’s performance of a romance-based heterosexual masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 4, 186-200.
40.
Riley, S.C.E. ( 2003). The management of the traditional male role: A discourse analysis of the constructions and functions of provision. Journal of Gender Studies, 12, 99-113.
41.
Speer, S. ( 2002). Sexist talk: Gender categories, participants’ orientations and irony. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 347-377.
42.
Thompson, E., Pleck, J., & Ferrera, D. ( 1992). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573-607.
43.
Tolman, D.L. ( 2002). Dilemmas of desire: Teenage girls talk about sexuality . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Tolman, D.L., Spencer, R., Harmon, T., Rosen-Reynoso, M., & Striepe, M. ( 2004). Getting close, staying cool: Early adolescent boys’ experiences with romantic relationships. In N. Way & J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 235-255). New York: New York University Press.
45.
Way, N. ( 2004). Intimacy, desire, and distrust in the friendships of adolescent boys. In N. Way & J. Chu (Eds.), Adolescent boys: Exploring diverse cultures of boyhood (pp. 167-196). New York: New York University Press.
46.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. ( 1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and pscyho-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology , 9, 335-356.
