Participation in sports and participation in cultural activities are usually considered separately in economic empirical studies. Because both of these activities are forms of leisure, this paper analyzes the determination of their consumption as joint and related decisions. Our theoretical framework is the neoclassical theory of the allocation of time. Our empirical analysis begins with a Constant Elasticity Substitution (CES) utility function, which we use to estimate the decision to participate in sports and cultural activities in the first stage. Conditional on the results of this stage, we then estimate the amount of time allocated to these activities. The data come from the Time Use Survey implemented by the National Statistics Office (INE) in 2002-2003. In this survey, the time allocated to sports and cultural activities in a single day is collected for each individual in detail. The results reveal a complementary relationship between the two activities and suggest that males and females exhibit different behaviors.
AhnS. C., & LeeY. H. (2003). Life-cycle demand for Major League Baseball. Paper presented at the 2003 Western Economics Association meeting, Denver, CO.
2.
AmemiyaT. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AndreffW., & SzymanskiS. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook on the economics of sports. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing.
4.
Baffoe-BonnieJ. (2009). Black-White wage differentials in a multiple sample selection bias model.Atlantic Economic Journal, 37, 1–16.
5.
BaumolW. J., & BowenW. G. (1966). Performing arts: The economic dilemma. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
BeckerG. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time.Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.
7.
BeckerG., GrossmanM., & MurphyK. M. (1994). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
8.
BittmanM., & WajcmanJ. (2000). The rush hour: The character of leisure time and gender equity.Social Forces, 79, 165–189.
9.
BreuerC., & WickerP. (2008). Demographic and economic factors influencing inclusion in the German sports system: A microanalysis of the years 1985 to 2005.European Journal for Sport and Society, 5, 35–43.
10.
BreuerC., & WickerP. (2009). Decreasing sports activity with increasing age? Findings from a 20-year longitudinal and cohort sequence analysis.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(1), 22–31.
11.
BuraimoB., HumphreysB., & SimmonsR. (2010). Participation and engagement in sport: A double hurdle approach for the United Kingdom. Selected works of Babatunde Buraimo, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom.
12.
CameronA. C., & TrivediP. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CawleyJ. (2004). An economic framework for understanding physical activity and eating behaviour.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 117–125.
14.
DawsonP., & DownwardP. (2009). Participation, spectatorship, and media coverage in sport. Manuscript in preparation, University of Bath, United Kingdom.
15.
DownwardP. (2007). Exploring the economic choice to participate in sport: Results from the 2002 General Household Survey. The International Review of Applied Economics, 21, 633–653.
16.
DownwardP., & DawsonA. (2000). The economics of professional team sports. New York: Routledge.
DownwardP., & RasciuteS. (2010). The relative demands for sports and leisure in England.European Sport Management Quarterly,10, 189–214.
19.
DownwardP., & RiordanJ. (2007). Social interactions and the demand for sport: An economic analysis.Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 518–537.
20.
FarrellL., & ShieldsM. A. (2002). Investigating the economic and demographic determinants of sporting participation in England. Journal of theRoyal Statistical Society (A), 165, 335–348.
21.
Fernández-BallesterosR. (1998). Quality of life: Concept and assessment. In AdairJ., BelangerD., & DionK. (Eds.), Advances in psychological science: Social, personal and cultural aspects (pp. 387–406). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
22.
Fernández-BallesterosR., KruseA., ZamarrónM. D., and CapraraM. G. (2007). Quality of life, life satisfaction, and positive aging. In R. Fernández-Ballestros (Ed.), Geropsychology: European perspective for an aging world (pp. 197–223). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
23.
Fernández-BallesterosR., ZamarrónM. D., RudingerG., SchrootsJ. J. F., HekkinnenE., DrusiniA., . (2004). Assessing competence: The European Survey on Aging Protocol (ESAP).Gerontology, 50, 330–347.
24.
FizelJ. (2006). Handbook of sports economics research. Armonk, New YorkM. E. Sharpe.
FriedbergL., & WebbA. (2006). The chore wars.Selected works of Anthony Webb, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
27.
GarcíaJ., Lera-LópezF., & SuárezM. J. (2009). Estimation of a structural model of the determinants of the time spent on physical activity and sport: Evidence for Spain. Economic discussion paper, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
28.
García FerrandoM. (2001a). Los Españoles y el deporte: Prácticas y comportamientos en la última década del Siglo XX. [The Spanish and sport: Practices and behaviors in the last decade of the 20th Century.] Madrid, Spain: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura, y Deporte, Consejo Superior de Deportes.
29.
García FerrandoM. (2001b). La gestión del deporte en el ámbito municipal: De la promoción a la fidelización del cliente. [Sport management in the municipal area: Promotion to the customer loyalty]. In M. Latiesa . (Eds. ), deporte y cambio social en el umbral del Siglo XXI (pp. 17–40). Madrid, Spain: Librerías Deportivas Esteban Sanz.
30.
García FerrandoM. (2005). Globalización y deporte: Paradojas de la globalización. [Globilization and sport: Paradoxes of globalization]. In A. Ariño (Ed.), Las encrucijadas de la diversidad cultural (pp. 453–466). Madrid, Spain: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
31.
García FerrandoM. (2006). Posmodernidad y deporte: Entre la individualización y la masificación [Postmodernism and sport: Between the indiviualization and massification].Encuesta de los Hábitos Deportivos de los Españoles 2005. Madrid, Spain: CIS/Siglo XXI.
32.
GrattonC., & TiceA. (1991). The demand for sport: A two-stage econometric model estimated from the health and lifestyle survey. Discussion paper, Manchester Polytechnic, United Kingdom.
33.
GrayC. M. (2003). Participation. In R. Towse (Ed.), A handbook of cultural economics (pp. 356365). Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar.
34.
GreeneW. (2008). Econometric analysis (6th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
35.
HamJ. C. (1982). Estimation of a labour supply model with censoring due to unemployment and underemployment.Review of Economic Studies, 49, 335–354.
36.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error.Econometrica, 47, 153–61.
37.
HovemannG., & WickerP. (2009). Determinants of sport participation in the European Union.European Journal for Sport and Society, 6, 51–59.
38.
HumphreysB., & RuseskiJ. (2006). Economic determinants of participation in physical activity and sport. Manuscript in preparation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
39.
HumphreysB., & RuseskiJ. (2007). Participation in physical activity and government spending on parks and recreation.Contemporary Economic Policy, 25, 538–552.
40.
HumphreysB., & RuseskiJ. (2009). The economics of participation and time spent in physical activity. Manuscript in preparation, University of Alberta, Canada.
41.
HumphreysB., & RuseskiJ. (2010). The economic choice of participation and time spent in physical activity and sport in Canada. Manuscript in preparation, University of Alberta, Canada.
42.
HumphreysB., SoebbingB., & LeeY. (2010). Consumer behaviour in lottery: The double hurdle approach and zeros in gambling survey data.International Gambling Studies, 10, 165–172.
43.
Instituto Nacional de Estadistica (2004). La Encuesta de Empleo del Tiempo [Spanish Time Use Survey 2002–2003]. Madrid, Spain: Author.
JusterF. T., & StaffordF. P. (1991). The allocation of time: Empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement.Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 471–522.
46.
KesenneS. (1981). Time-allocation and the linear expenditure system.Recherces Economiques de Louvain, 46, 113–123.
47.
KesenneS. (1983). Substitution in consumption: An application to the allocation of time.European Economic Review, 23, 231–239.
48.
KesenneS., & ButzenP. (1987). Subsidizing sports facilities: The shadow price-elasticities of sports.Applied Economics, 19, 101–110.
49.
KopczynskiM., & HagerM. (2003). Denver: Performing arts research coalition community report 2002. Denver, CO: Pew Charitable Trusts.
50.
KurabayashiY., & ItoT. (1992). Socio-economic characteristics of audiences for western classical music in Japan: A statistical analysis. In R. Towse & A. Khakee (Eds.), Cultural economics (pp. 275–287). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
51.
Lagardera OteroF. (1992). Deporte y calidad de vida: La sociedad deportivizada [Sport and quality of life: The sportsmanship society]. In C. García López (coord.), Actas del 80 Congreso Científico Olímpico 1992 (pp. 412–423). Benalmádena, Spain: Instituto Andaluz del Deporte, Junta de Andalucía.
52.
LeeY. H., & SmithT. G. (2008). Why are Americans addicted to baseball? An empirical analysis of fandom in Korea and the United States.Contemporary Economic Policy, 26, 32–48.
53.
LeedsM., & Von AllmenP. (2002).The economics of sports. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
54.
Lera-LópezF., & Rapún-GárateM. (2005). Sports participation versus consumer expenditure on sport: Different determinants and strategies in sports management.European Sports Management Quarterly, 5, 167–186.
55.
Lera-LópezF., & Rapún-GárateM. (2007). The demand for sport: Sport consumption and participation models.Journal of Sport Management, 21, 103–122.
56.
Lévy-GarbouaL., & MontmarquetteC. (1996). A microeconometric study of theater demand.Journal of Cultural Economics, 20, 25–50.
57.
Lévy-GarbouaL., & MontmarquetteC. (2002). The demand for the arts. Presented in a scientific series at Centre Interuniversitarie de Reserche and Analyze des Organizations, Montreal, Canada.
58.
LoylandK., & RingstadV. (2009). On the price and income sensitivity of the demand for sports: Has Linder's disease become more serious?Journal of Sports Economics, 10, 601–618.
59.
LoylandK., & RingstadV. (2010). Borrowing demand at local public libraries in Sweden. Presented at the 16th International Conference on Cultural Economics by the Association for Childhood Education International, Copenhagen, Denmark.
60.
MaddalaG. S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Martínez del CastilloJ., Jiménez-BeattyJ. E., GrauperaJ. L., & RodríguezM. L. (2006). Condiciones de vida, socialización, y actividad física en la vejez [Living conditions, socialization, and physical activity in old age].Revista Internacional de Sociología, 44, 39–62.
62.
Martínez del CastilloJ., VázquezB., GrauperaJ. L., Jiménez-BeattyJ. E., AlfaroÉ., HernándezM., & AvelinoD. (2005). Estudio sobre la actividad física y deportiva de las mujeres del municipio de Madrid: Hábitos, demandas, y barreras [Study about sport and physical activity of women in the municipality of Madrid: Habits, demands, and barriers]. Madrid, Spain: Ayuntamiento de Madrid, Área de Gobierno de Empleo y Servicios a la Ciudadanía.
63.
MattinglyM. J., & BianchiS. M. (2003). Gender differences in the quantity and quality of free time: The U.S. experience.Social Forces, 81, 999–1030.
64.
MattinglyM. J., & SayerL. C. (2006). Under pressure: Gender differences in the relationship between free time and feeling rushed.Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 205–221.
65.
McCarthyK. F., & JinnettK. (2001). A new framework for building participation in the arts. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
66.
McConnellK. (1992). On-site time in the demand for recreation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, 918–25.
67.
MontgomeryS. S., & RobinsonM. D. (2006). Take me out to the opera: Are sports and arts complements? Evidence from the performing arts research coalition data.International Journal of Arts Management, 8, 24–37.
68.
MontgomeryS. S., & RobinsonM. D. (2008). Dick and Jane go to the ballet or was it the baseball game? Empirical evidence on the battle of sexes within a human capital appreciation model. Presented at the 15th International Conference on Cultural Economics by the Association for Cultural Economics International, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
69.
MontgomeryS. S., & RobinsonM. D. (2010). Empirical evidence of the effects of marriage on male and female attendance at sports and arts.Social Science Quarterly, 91(1), 99–116.
70.
MoscosoD. (2005). La construcción social y cultural del liderazgo en el deporte. [Social construction and cultural leadership in sport].Apunts: Educación Física y Deportes, 79, 5–12.
71.
MulliganC. B., SchneiderB., & WolfeR. (2005). Non-response and population representation in studies on adolescent time use.Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research, 2, 33–53.
72.
PommerehneW., & KirchgassnerG. (1987). The impact of television on the demand for cinema and theatre performances. In N. K. Grant . (Eds.), Economic efficiency and the performing arts (pp. 44–61). Akron, OH: Association for Cultural Economics.
73.
Prieto-RodriguezJ., & V. Fernandez-Blanco (2000, May). Are live sports substitutes of culture consumption? Some evidence for the Spanish Case. Presented at the ACEI 11th International Biennial Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
74.
Prieto-RodríguezJ., & Fernández-BlancoV. (2000). Are popular and classical music listeners the same people?Journal of Cultural Economics, 24, 147–164.
75.
PuigN., & SolerS. (2004). Mujer y deporte en España: Estado de la cuestión y propuesta interpretativa [Women and Sport in Spain: Current situation and proposed interpretive].Apunts: Educación Física y Deportes, 76, 71–78.
76.
SandyR., SloaneP., & RosentraubM. (2004). The economics of sport: An international perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
SeamanB. A. (2005). Attendance and public participation in the performing arts: A review of the empirical literature. Manuscript in preparation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
78.
SpennerE. L., FennA. J., & CrookerJ. R. (2004). The demand for NFL attendance: A rational addiction model. Manuscript in preparation, Colorado College, Colorado Springs.
79.
SternN. (1986). On the specification of labour supply functions. In R. Blundell & I. Walker (Eds.), Unemployment, search, and labour supply (pp. 143–189). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
80.
StiglerG. J., & BeckerG. S. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum [Taste of a dispute].American Economic Review, 67, 76–90.
81.
StrattonM., ConnL., LiawC., & ConnollyL. (2005). Sport and related physical activity: The social correlates of participation and non-participation by adults. Presented at a Sport Management Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Canberra, Australia.
82.
SwansonS. R., DavisJ. C., & ZhaoY. (2008). Art for art's sake? An examination of motives for arts performance attendance.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37, 300–323.
83.
ThrosbyD. (1994). The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics.Journal of Economic Literature, 32, 1–29.
84.
WickerP., BreuerC., & PawlowskiT. (2009). Promoting sport for all to age specific target groups: The impact of sport infrastructure.European Sports Management Quarterly, 9, 103–118.
85.
ZabalzaA., (1983). The CES utility function, non-linear budget constraints, and labour supply: Results on female participation and hours.Economic Journal, 93, 312–330.
