Although social support is assumed to be an important factor following loss, the mechanisms by which it influences outcomes are not well understood. This study explored the nature of social support following loss using mixed methods. Widows participated in semistructured interviews 1 and 4 months after loss; a subsample completed 98 days of questionnaires between interviews. Interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method; themes included the importance of supportive groups and the meaning of support. Social support trajectories were examined using hierarchical linear modeling; perceived social control explained differences in trajectories. Additional interviews were selected by their maximally divergent plots. The findings of these analyses were integrated to contribute a more detailed description of social support in the transition to widowhood.
Bisconti, T.L., Bergeman, C.S., & Boker, S. (2006). Social support as a predictor of variability: An examination of the adjustment trajectories of recent widows. Psychology & Aging, 21, 590-599.
2.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development . American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
3.
Brown, S.L., Nesse, R.M., Vinokur, A.D., & Smith, D.M. (2003). Providing social support may be more important than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320-327.
4.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear modeling to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin,101, 147-158.
5.
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1988). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
6.
Curran, P.J., Bauer, D.J., & Willoughby, M.T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods , 9, 220-237.
7.
Cutrona, C.E., & Russell, D.W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In I. G. Sarason , B. R. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319-366). Oxford, UK: Wiley .
8.
Healy, J.M., Jr., & Stewart, A. (1991). On the compatibility of quantitative and qualitative methods for studying individual lives. Perspectives in Personality, 3, 35-57.
9.
Henderson, S., Duncan-Jones, P., Byrne, D.G., & Scott, R. (1980). Measuring social relationships: The Interview Schedule for Social Interaction. Psychological Medicine, 10, 723-734.
10.
Kahn, R.L., & Antonucci, T.C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. C. Brim (Eds.), Life-span, development, and behavior (pp. 254-283). New York: Academic Press.
11.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Mandara, J. (2003). The typological approach in child and family psychology: A review of theory, methods, and research. ClinicalChild and Family Psychology Review, 6, 129-146.
13.
Masten, A.S., Best, K.M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425-444.
14.
Maykut, P.S., & Morehouse, R.E. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Washington, DC: Falmer.
15.
Neimeyer, R.A., & Hogan, N.S. (2001). Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of grief. In M. S. Strobe, R. O. Hansson, W. Strobe , & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 89-118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
Newman, I., Ridenour, C., Newman, C., & DiMarco, G. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 167-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Patton, M.Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Reid, D.W., & Ziegler, M. (1981). The desired control measure and adjustment among the elderly. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct, Vol. 1: Assessment methods (pp. 127-159). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Rutter, M. (1987). Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms . American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316-331.
20.
Sanders, C.M. (1993). Risk factors in bereavement outcome. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe , & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 256-267). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Sarason, B.R., Sarason, I.G., & Pierce G.R. (1990). Social support: An interactional view. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
22.
Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Stroebe, M.S., Hansson, R.O., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. (2001). Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
Stroebe, M.S., & Stroebe, W. (1989). Who participates in bereavement research? A review and empirical study. Omega, 20, 1-29.
27.
Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. (1987). Bereavement and health. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J.W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3-6.
29.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples . Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 77-100.
31.
Umberson, D., Wortman, C.B., & Kessler, R.C. (1992). Widowhood and depression: Explaining long-term gender differences in vulnerability. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 10-24.
