Considerations for Preparing High-Quality Peer Reviews of Mixed Methods Manuscripts

American Educational Research Association . (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403

American Psychological Association . (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Caputo R. K. (2019). Peer review: A vital gatekeeping function and obligation of professional scholarly practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 100(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389418808155

Chong S. W. Lin T. (2024). Feedback practices in journal peer-review: A systematic literature review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2164757

COPE . (2017). COPE ethical guidelines for peer reviewers. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.9

Corr C. Chudzik M. Oh J. R. Love H. R. Snodgrass M. R. (2023). Mixed methods journal reviewing in early childhood special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 43(3), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214231170587

Creswell J. W. Plano Clark V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Fàbregues S. Guetterman T. C. (2025). Barriers to publishing mixed methods studies in disciplinary journals. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 19(2), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898251326831

Fàbregues S. Molina-Azorin J. F. (2017). Addressing quality in mixed methods research: A review and recommendations for a future agenda. Quality and Quantity, 51(6), 2847–2863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0449-4

Farber S. (2024). Enhancing peer review efficiency: A mixed-methods analysis of artificial intelligence-assisted reviewer selection across academic disciplines. Learned Publishing, 37(4), Article e1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1638

Fetters M. D. Molina-Azorin J. F. (2019a). A checklist of mixed methods elements in a submission for advancing the methodology of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819875832

Fetters M. D. Molina-Azorin J. F. (2019b). New requirements to include the methodological contribution in articles published in the Journal of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819834753

Fischer C. C. (2011). A value-added role for reviewers in enhancing the quality of published research. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(2), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.42.2.226

Guetterman T. C. (2017). What distinguishes a novice from an expert mixed methods researcher? Quality and Quantity, 51(1), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0310-9

Guetterman T. C. Sakakibara R. V. Plano Clark V. L. Luborsky M. Murray S. M. Castro F. G. Creswell J. W. Deutsch C. Gallo J. J. (2019). Mixed methods grant applications in the health sciences: An analysis of reviewer comments. PLoS One, 14(11), Article e0225308. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225308

Heyvaert M. Hannes K. Maes B. Onghena P. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 302–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813479449

Onwuegbuzie A. J. Poth C. (2016). Editors’ afterword: Toward evidence-based guidelines for reviewing mixed methods research manuscripts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406916628986

Plano Clark V. L. Ivankova N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A guide to the field. Sage.

Toraman S. Howell Smith M. Guetterman T. Johnson B. R. Plano Clark V. L. (2021, April 10). How to convey the methodology of mixed methods research in conference proposals: Advice from mixed methods scholars [Invited session]. Annual American Educational Research Association Conference [Virtual]. https://www.aera.net/Portals/38/docs/SIGs/SIG158/AERA_2021_MMR_SIG_methods-focused_proposals_Toraman_et_al_handout.pdf

Toraman Turk S. Plano Clark V. L. Guetterman T. C. Curry L. A. (2024). Exploring the potential for cultural humility in the evolving field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 18(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898241250085