Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout

Abstract

Background and purpose

Carotid blowout is a life threatening complication of invasive head and neck cancers and their treatments. This is commonly treated with endovascular embolization and carotid stenting. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we report the immediate clinical results of patients receiving embolization and/or stenting for treatment of carotid blowout associated with head and neck cancer.

Materials and methods

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from the period 2003–2011, we defined carotid blowout patients as those with head and neck malignancies receiving carotid stenting and/or endovascular embolization without open surgery. Outcomes studied included mortality, acute ischemic stroke, hemiplegia/paresis, and other post-operative neurologic complications. Outcomes for the endovascular embolization and carotid stenting group were compared.

Results

A total of 1218 patients underwent endovascular treatment for carotid blowout. Of these, 1080 patients (88.6%) underwent embolization procedures and 138 patients (11.4%) underwent carotid stenting. The mortality rate of endovascular embolization patients was similar to that of carotid stenting patients (8.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 6.5%–9.7% versus 10.2%, 95% CI=6.0%–16.4%, p = 0.36). Stroke rate was similar between embolization patients and stenting patients (2.3%, 95% CI=1.6%–3.4% vs. 3.4%, 95% CI=1.3%–8.4%, p = 0.43). Hemiplegia rates were significantly higher rate in stenting patients compared with endovascular occlusion patients (3.8%, 95% CI=1.3%–8.4% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=1.4%–2.4%, p = 0.05). The rate of post-operative neurologic complications was higher in stenting patients compared with embolization patients (6.5%, 95% CI=3.3%–12.1% vs. 1.4%, 95% CI=0.9%–2.4%, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Given the natural history of carotid blowout, carotid stenting and endovascular embolization are acceptable means of treating this disease. Endovascular embolization remains the most common treatment among patients with head and neck cancers with lower overall rates of post-operative neurologic complications, including hemiplegia/paresis and stroke.

Keywords

Endovascular carotid blowout stenting coiling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chaloupka

. Endovascular therapy for the carotid blowout syndrome in head and neck surgical patients: Diagnostic and managerial considerations. ANJR Am J Neuroradiol 1996; 17: 843–852.

Kim

. Life-threatening common carotid artery blowout: rescue treatment with a newly designed self-expanding covered nitinol stent. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 226–231.

Mazumdar

. Update on endovascular management of the carotid blowout syndrome. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2009; 19: 271–281.

McDonald

Moore

Johnstone

. Risk of carotid blowout after reirradiation of the head and neck: A systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 82: 1083–1089.

Yamazaki

. Frequency, outcome and prognostic factors of carotid blowout syndrome after hypofractionated re-irradiation of head and neck cancer using CyberKnife: A multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107: 305–309.

Chang

. Complications of carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancers treated by covered stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14(Suppl. 2): 29–33.

Chang

. Evaluation of the outcomes of endovascular management for patients with head and neck cancers and associated carotid blowout syndrome of the external carotid artery. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: e561–569. .

Chen

. Endovascular covered stent reconstruction improved the outcomes of acute carotid blowout syndrome. Experiences at a single institute. Interv Neuroradiol 2008; 14(Suppl. 2): 23–27.

Koutsimpelas

. Endovascular carotid reconstruction in palliative head and neck cancer patients with threatened carotid blowout presents a beneficial supportive care measure. J Palliat Med 2008; 11: 784–789.

10.

Miller

. Covered stents safely utilized to prevent catastrophic hemorrhage in patients with advanced head and neck malignancy. J Neurointerv Surg 2012; 4: 426–434.

11.

Nassiri

. Endovascular palliation of multivessel blowout syndrome in the setting of a nonresectable neck sarcoma. Ann Vasc Surg 2013; 27: 111 e5–e9.

12.

Pyun

. Placement of covered stents for carotid blowout in patients with head and neck cancer: Follow-up results after rescue treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28: 1594–1598.

13.

Wan

. Endovascular treatment paradigm of carotid blowout syndrome: Review of 8-years experience. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 95–99.

14.

Zussman

. Endovascular management of carotid blowout. World Neurosurg 2012; 78: 109–114.

15.

Morrissey

. Endovascular management of hemorrhage in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 123: 15–19.

16.

Powitzky

. Carotid blowout in patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2010; 119: 476–484.

17.

Patsalides

. Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome: Who and how to treat. J Neurointerv Surg 2010; 2: 87–93.

18.

Shah

. Acute life-threatening hemorrhage in patients with head and neck cancer presenting with carotid blowout syndrome: Follow-up results after initial hemostasis with covered-stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 743–747.