Improving mechanical thrombectomy time metrics in the angiography suite: Stroke cart,parallel workflows,and conscious sedation

Abstract

Purpose

Earlier reperfusion of large-vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke improves functional outcomes. We hypothesize that use of a stroke cart in the angiography suite, containing all commonly used procedural equipment in a mechanical thrombectomy, combined with parallel staff workflows, and use of conscious sedation when possible, improve mechanical thrombectomy time metrics.

Methods

We identified 47 consecutive LVO patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy at our center, retrospectively and prospectively from implementation of these three workflow changes (19 pre- and 28 post-). For each patient, last known normal, NIHSS, angiography suite in-room time, type of anesthesia, groin puncture time, on-clot time, recanalization time, LVO location, number of passes, device(s) used, mTICI score, and outcome (mRS) were recorded. Between-group comparisons of time metrics and multivariate regression were performed.

Results

Stroke cart, parallel workflows, and primary use of conscious sedation decreased in-room time to groin puncture (−21.3 min, p < 0.0001), in-room to on-clot time (−24.1 min, p = 0.001), and in-room to reperfusion time (−29.5 min, p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, endotracheal intubation and general anesthesia were found to significantly increase in-room to on-clot time (p = 0.01), in-room to reperfusion time (p = 0.01), and groin puncture to on-clot time (p = 0.05). The number of patients achieving a good outcome (mRS 0−2), however, did not significantly differ between the two groups (9/18 (47%) vs 14/28 (50%), p = 0.60).

Conclusions

Use of a stroke cart, parallel workflows by neurointerventionalists, technologists, and nursing staff, and use of conscious sedation may be useful to other institutions in efforts to improve procedural times.

Keywords

Stroke thrombectomy workflow techniques

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

Mitchell

Kleinig

et al.

Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1009–1018.

Goyal

Demchuk

Menon

et al.

Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 1019–1030.

Jovin

Chamorro

Cobo

et al.

Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2296–2306.

Saver

Goyal

Bonafe

et al.

Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2285–2295.

Berkhemer

Fransen

Beumer

et al.

A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 11–20.

Saver

. Time is brain—quantified. Stroke 2006; 37: 263–266.

Emberson

Lees

Lyden

et al.

Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 384: 1929–1935.

Fransen

Berkhemer

Lingsma

et al.

Time to reperfusion and treatment effect for acute ischemic stroke: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2016; 73: 190–196.

Khatri

Abruzzo

Yeatts

et al.

Good clinical outcome after ischemic stroke with successful revascularization is time-dependent. Neurology 2009; 73: 1066–1072.

10.

Goyal

Jadhav

Wilson

et al.

Shifting bottlenecks in acute stroke treatment. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 1099–1100.

11.

Frei

McGraw

McCarthy

et al.

A standardized neurointerventional thrombectomy protocol leads to faster recanalization times. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 1035–1040.

12.

Goyal

Menon

Hill

et al.

Consistently achieving computed tomography to endovascular recanalization <90 minutes: Solutions and innovations. Stroke 2014; 45: e252–e256.

13.

Zerna

Assis

d'Esterre

et al.

Imaging, intervention, and workflow in acute ischemic stroke: The Calgary approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016; 37: 978–984.

14.

Almekhlafi

Hockley

Desai

et al.

Overcoming the evening/weekend effects on time delays and outcomes of endovascular stroke therapy: The Calgary Stroke Program experience. J Neurointerv Surg 2014; 6: 729–732.

15.

McTaggart

Yaghi

Baird

et al.

Decreasing procedure times with a standardized approach to ELVO cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 2–5.

16.

Menon

Sajobi

Zhang

et al.

Analysis of workflow and time to treatment on thrombectomy outcome in the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Proximal Occlusion Ischemic Stroke (ESCAPE) randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2016; 133: 2279–2286.

17.

Goyal

Jadhav

Bonafe

et al.

Analysis of workflow and time to treatment and the effects on outcome in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: Results from the SWIFT PRIME randomized controlled trial. Radiology 2016; 279: 888–897.

18.

McTaggart

Ansari

Goyal

et al.

Initial hospital management of patients with emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO): Report of the standards and guidelines committee of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. J Neurointerv Surg 2017; 9: 316–323.

19.

Whalin

Halenda

Haussen

et al.

Even small decreases in blood pressure during conscious sedation affect clinical outcome after stroke thrombectomy: An analysis of hemodynamic thresholds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 294–298.

20.

McDonagh

Olson

Kalia

et al.

Anesthesia and sedation practices among neurointerventionalists during acute ischemic stroke endovascular therapy. Front Neurol 2010; 1: 118.

21.

Abou-Chebl

Lin

Hussain

et al.

Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular therapy for acute anterior circulation stroke: Preliminary results from a retrospective, multicenter study. Stroke 2010; 41: 1175–1179.

22.

Jumaa

Zhang

Ruiz-Ares

et al.

Comparison of safety and clinical and radiographic outcomes in endovascular acute stroke therapy for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion with intubation and general anesthesia versus the nonintubated state. Stroke 2010; 41: 1180–1184.

23.

Nichols

Carrozzella

Yeatts

et al.

Is periprocedural sedation during acute stroke therapy associated with poorer functional outcomes?. J Neurointerv Surg 2010; 2: 67–70.

24.

Al-Mufti

Dancour

Amuluru

et al.

Neurocritical care of emergent large-vessel occlusion: The era of a new standard of care. J Intensive Care Med 2017; 32: 373–386.

25.

Berkhemer OA, van den Berg LA, Fransen PSS. Impact of general anesthesia on treatment effect in the MR CLEAN trial: A post-hoc analysis. International Stroke Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, 11–13 February 2005.

26.

Schönenberger

Uhlmann

Hacke

et al.

Effect of conscious sedation vs general anesthesia on early neurological improvement among patients with ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016; 316: 1986–1996.

27.

Almasi

Gottlieb

. Highly parallel computing, Redwood City, CA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1989.

28.

Nedeltchev

Arnold

Brekenfeld

et al.

Pre- and in-hospital delays from stroke onset to intra-arterial thrombolysis. Stroke 2003; 34: 1230–1234.

29.

Lowhagen Henden

Rentzos

Karlsson

et al.

General anesthesia versus conscious sedation for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: The AnStroke trial (Anesthesia During Stroke). Stroke 2017; 48: 1601–1607.