Flow-diverter stents for endovascular management of non-fetal posterior communicating artery aneurysms—analysis on aneurysm occlusion,vessel patency,and patient outcome

Abstract

Background

Use of flow-diversion technology in the treatment of incidental and recanalized posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms.

Methods

Patients treated with the Pipeline embolization device (PED) for PComA aneurysms were identified and included in our retrospective analysis. We evaluated aneurysm characteristics, modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) on admission, angiography follow-up, and patient clinical outcome at discharge, at three to nine months, and at 12–18 months.

Results

We included 56 patients with a mean age of 56 years. Median mRS on admission was 0. All aneurysms involved the PComA and were either new findings or found to have shown recanalization at angiography follow-up from previous coil embolization or surgical clipping. Intraprocedural device foreshortening was observed in one case requiring additional placement of a self-expanding stent. One intraprocedural aneurysm rupture occurred because of a broken distal wire. This patient had an mRS of 4 after the procedure. Three- to nine-month and 12- to 18-month follow-up angiography showed near complete or complete aneurysm occlusion in most cases. Minimal to mild intimal hyperplasia was seen in five cases at three to nine months. PComA patency over time showed 29 of 46 initially patent vessels still patent at six months. Thirteen and seven PComAs showed progressive decrease in flow at three to nine months and 12–18 months, respectively. Median mRS remained 0 for all patients at three- to nine-month and 12- to 18-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results show that flow-diversion technology is an effective and safe treatment option. Larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate our promising results.

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter stent posterior communicating artery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

Rohde

Berkefeld

et al.

Size and location of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms measured by 3-dimensional rotational angiography. Surg Neurol 2006; 65: 18–25.

Birchall

Khangure

McAuliffe

. Resolution of third nerve paresis after endovascular management of aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery. Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 411–413.

Kupersmith

Heller

Cox

. Magnetic resonance angiography and clinical evaluation of third nerve palsies and posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 228–234.

Paterson

. Direct surgery in the treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Lancet 1968; 2: 808–811.

Hamilton

Falconer

. Immediate and late results of surgery in cases of saccular intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1959; 16: 514–541.

Dimopoulos

Fountas

Feltes

et al.

Literature review regarding the methodology of assessing third nerve paresis associated with non-ruptured posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev 2005; 28: 256–260.

Soni

. Aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery and oculomotor paresis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974; 37: 475–484.

Kassis

Jouanneau

Tahon

et al.

Recovery of third nerve palsy after endovascular treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2010; 73: 11–16.

Yanaka

Matsumaru

Mashiko

et al.

Small unruptured cerebral aneurysms presenting with oculomotor nerve palsy. Neurosurgery 2003; 52: 553–557; discussion 556–557.

10.

Brinjikji

Lanzino

Cloft

et al.

Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 120: 84–88.

11.

Wiebers

Whisnant

Huston

3rd et al.

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003; 362: 103–110.

12.

Rangel-Castilla

Munich

Jaleel

et al.

Patency of anterior circulation branch vessels after Pipeline embolization: Longer-term results from 82 aneurysm cases. J Neurosurg 2017; 126: 1064–1069.

13.

Mazur

Kilburg

Wang

et al.

Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of vertebral artery aneurysms: The fate of covered branch vessels. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8: 1041–1047.

14.

McDougall

Spetzler

Zabramski

et al.

The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg 2012; 116: 135–144.

15.

Molyneux

Kerr

Stratton

et al.

International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267–1274.

16.

Leipzig

Morgan

Horner

et al.

Analysis of intraoperative rupture in the surgical treatment of 1694 saccular aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 455–468.

17.

Molyneux

Kerr

et al.

International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809–817.

18.

Campi

Ramzi

Molyneux

et al.

Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007; 38: 1538–1544.

19.

Shapiro

Becske

Sahlein

et al.

Stent-supported aneurysm coiling: A literature survey of treatment and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012; 33: 159–163.

20.

Malisch

Guglielmi

Viñuela

et al.

Unruptured aneurysms presenting with mass effect symptoms: Response to endosaccular treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. Part I. Symptoms of cranial nerve dysfunction. J Neurosurg 1998; 89: 956–961.

21.

Inamasu

Nakamura

Saito

et al.

Early resolution of third nerve palsy following endovascular treatment of a posterior communicating artery aneurysm. J Neuroophthalmol 2002; 22: 12–14.

22.

Stiebel-Kalish

Maimon

Amsalem

et al.

Evolution of oculomotor nerve paresis after endovascular coiling of posterior communicating artery aneurysms: A neuro-ophthalmological perspective. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 1268–1273.

23.

Kim

Lee

et al.

Unruptured aneurysms with cranial nerve symptoms: Efficacy of endosaccular Guglielmi detachable coil treatment. Korean J Radiol 2003; 4: 141–145.

24.

Ahn

Han

Yoon

et al.

Clipping vs coiling of posterior communicating artery aneurysms with third nerve palsy. Neurology 2006; 66: 121–123.

25.

Hanse

Gerrits

van Rooji

et al.

Recovery of posterior communicating artery aneurysm-induced oculomotor palsy after coiling. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 988–990.

26.

Birchall

Khangure

McAuliffe

. Resolution of third nerve paresis after endovascular management of aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 411–413.

27.

Kim

. Oculomotor nerve palsy caused by posterior communicating artery aneurysms: Evaluation of symptoms after endovascular treatment. Interv Neuroradiol 2011; 17: 415–419.

28.

Santillan

Zink

Knopman

et al.

Early endovascular management of oculomotor nerve palsy associated with posterior communicating artery aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2010; 16: 17–21.

29.

Zhang

Pei

Cai

et al.

Endovascular management and recovery from oculomotor nerve palsy associated with aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery. World Neurosurg 2010; 74: 316–319.