We compared outcomes and adverse events of thrombectomy versus medical management in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with baseline large infarct core.
Methods
We searched Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL, Cochrane Library Clinical Controlled Trials and EMBASE from inception to January 2021 for studies comparing thrombectomy and medical management alone in AIS patients who had ASPECTS <=7 or ischemic core volume >=50 ml. Imaging modalities to valuate ASPECTS and core volume were without restriction. The functional outcome was measured by mRS (modified Rankin Scale) score 0-2 at 90 days or discharge. The safety end point included the rates of mortality and sICH (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) or PH2 (parenchymal hematoma type 2).
Results
Fourteen studies with a total of 2547 patients (thrombectomy n = [1197]; medical care alone [n = 1350]) fulfilled our criteria. As for patients with low ASPECTS, pooled results indicated a higher odds of good functional outcome (OR = 3.47; 95% CI 1.99 to 6.07; P < 0.0001, I2=66%) and a lower risk of mortality (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83; P = 0.001, I2=32%) in thrombectomy group compared with no thrombectomy group, but the risk of sICH or PH2 did not differ between two groups. As for patients with large core volume, both functional outcome and safety end point between two groups showed no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion
Thrombectomy remained safe and effective by careful selection in patients with low ASPECTS. More studies were warranted to explore contraindications for mechanical thrombectomy in AIS patients, especially in patients with large core volume.
RochaMJadhavAPJovinTG.Endovascular therapy for large vessel occlusion stroke: an update on the most recent clinical trials. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2019;
39: 1661–1663.
2.
PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonT, et al.
2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2018;
49: e46–e110.
3.
PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonT, et al.; on behalf of the American Heart Association Stroke Council.
Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2019;
50: e344–e418.
4.
CampbellBCMitchellPJKleinigTJ, et al.
Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med2015;
372: 1009–1018.
5.
SaverJLGoyalMBonafeA, et al.
Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med2015;
372: 2285–2295.
6.
CampbellBCVMajoieCBLMAlbersGW, et al.
Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Lancet Neurol2019;
18: 46–55.
7.
RomanLSMenonBKBlascoJ, et al.
Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Lancet Neurol2018;
17: 895–904.
8.
SarrajAHassanAESavitzS, et al.
Outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy vs medical management alone in patients with large ischemic cores: a secondary analysis of the optimizing patient's selection for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke (SELECT) study. JAMA Neurol2019;
76: 1147.
9.
SongKGuanMLiW, et al.
Acute ischemic stroke patients with diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score <= 5 can benefit from endovascular treatment: a single-center experience and literature review. Neuroradiology2019;
61: 451–459.
10.
PhanKSalehSDmytriwAA, et al.
Influence of ASPECTS and endovascular thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a Meta-analysis. J NeuroIntervent Surg2019;
11: 664–669.
11.
CagnazzoFDerrazIDargazanliC, et al.
Mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and ASPECTS ≤ 6: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg2020;
12: 350–355.
12.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol2009;
62: 1006–1012.
13.
StangA.Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol2010;
25: 603–605.
14.
ChenZZhangRZhouY, et al.
Patients with ischemic core ≥70 ml within 6 h of symptom onset may still benefit from endovascular treatment. Front Neurol2018;
9: 933.
15.
WasserKPapanagiotouPBrunnerF, et al.
Impact of ASPECTS on computed tomography angiography source images on outcome after thrombolysis or endovascular therapy in large vessel occlusions. Eur J Neurol2016;
23: 1599–1605.
16.
SchniederMPsychogiosMNMaierIL, et al.
The problem of strict image-based inclusion criteria for mechanical thrombectomy - an analysis of stroke patients with an initial low CBV-ASPECTS score. Neuroradiol J2019;
32: 287–293.
17.
JiangSPengYJingCH, et al.
Endovascular thrombectomy can be beneficial to acute ischemic stroke patients with large infarcts. J Neurosurg2018;
130: 1383–1390.
18.
Kim-TenserMMlynashMLansbergMG, et al.
CT perfusion core and ASPECT score prediction of outcomes in DEFUSE 3. Int J Stroke2021; 16: 288–294.
19.
OhtaTMorimotoMOkadaK, et al.
Mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation occlusion could be more effective than medical management even in low DWI-ASPECTS patients. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)2018;
58: 156–163.
20.
KerlerouxBJanotKDargazanliC, et al.
Perfusion imaging to select patients with large ischemic core for mechanical thrombectomy. J Stroke2020;
22: 225–233.
21.
MourandIAbergelEMantillaD, et al.
Favorable revascularization therapy in patients with ASPECTS ≤ 5 on DWI in anterior circulation stroke. J Neurointerv Surg2018;
10: 5–9.
22.
KakitaHYoshimuraSUchidaK, et al.; RESCUE-Japan Registry 2 Investigators.
Impact of endovascular therapy in patients with large ischemic core: subanalysis of recovery by endovascular salvage for cerebral ultra-acute embolism Japan registry 2. Stroke2019;
50: 901–908.
23.
BroocksGFlottmannFSchonfeldM, et al.
Incomplete or failed thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score 0-5—how harmful is trying?Eur J Neurol2020;
27: 2031–2035.
24.
RebelloLCBouslamaMHaussenDC, et al.
Endovascular treatment for patients with acute stroke who have a large ischemic core and large mismatch imaging profile. JAMA Neurol2017;
74: 34–40.
25.
BarberPADemchukAMZhangJ, et al.
Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. Lancet2000;
355: 1670–1674.
26.
HuiFKObuchowskiNAJohnS, et al.
ASPECTS discrepancies between CT and MR imaging: Analysis and implications for triage protocols in acute ischemic stroke. J NeuroIntervent Surg2017;
9: 240–243.
27.
OzdemirAOEryildizESAkarsuFG, et al.
The role of ASPECTs in patient selection for endovascular therapy—CTA source images versus noncontrast CT. J Clin Neurosci2020;
73: 195–200.
28.
AlbersGWMarksMPKempS, et al.
Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med2018;
378: 708–718.
29.
NogueiraRGJadhavAPHaussenDC, et al.
Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med2018;
378: 11–21.
30.
DemeestereJGarciaECGarciaBP, et al.
Evaluation of hyperacute infarct volume using ASPECTS and brain CT perfusion core volume. Neurology2017;
88: 2248–2253.
31.
YoshimotoTInoueMYamagamiH, et al.
Use of diffusion-weighted imaging-Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score (DWI-ASPECTS) and ischemic core volume to determine the malignant profile in acute stroke. J Am Heart Assoc2019;
8: e012558.
32.
SieglerJEMesseSRSucharewH, et al.
Noncontrast CT versus perfusion-based core estimation in large vessel occlusion: the blood pressure after endovascular stroke therapy study. J Neuroimaging2020;
30: 219–226.
33.
VagalAAvivRSucharewH, et al.
Collateral clock is more important than time clock for tissue fate a natural history study of acute ischemic strokes. Stroke2018;
49: 2102–2107.
34.
DaniereFLobotesisKMachiP, et al.
Patient selection for stroke endovascular therapy-DWI-ASPECTS thresholds should vary among age groups: insights from the RECOST study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015;
36: 32–39.
35.
DasSElliottCJDahleM, et al. Role of CT perfusion parameters and collateral score in predicting outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes who received both intravenous alteplase and endovascular thrombectomy. In: Neurology Conference: 71st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology. Minneapolis: American Academy of Neurology, 2019.
36.
GilgenMDKlimekDLiesirovaKT, et al.
Younger stroke patients with large pretreatment Diffusion-Weighted imaging lesions may benefit from endovascular treatment. Storke2015;
56: 2510–2516.
37.
KaesmacherJChaloulos-IakovidisPPanosL, et al.
Mechanical thrombectomy in ischemic stroke patients with Alberta stroke program early computed tomography score 0-5. Stroke2019;
50: 880–888.
