Despite advances in secondary stroke prevention during the last several years, cryptogenic stroke remains associated with a high risk of recurrence. Studies have shown that the recurrence risk is higher in patients with large artery disease in which complex carotid plaques and carotid WEBs are identified.
Methods
This is a case series of six patients with cryptogenic recurrent stroke in which conventional imaging and extensive workup did not identify an etiology. Intravascular optic coherence tomography (OCT) was performed using a ballon-guided flow-arrest technique to identify possible covert carotid lesions.
Results
We present six cases in which, with the help of OCT, we identified three carotid WEBs with associated thrombosis and two ulcerated carotid artery plaques. Four patients were subsequently treated with endovascular stent placement without complications. OCT permitted the distinction between complicated carotid artery plaque and carotid WEB.
Conclusion
Intravascular OCT is a feasible and safe approach to identifying patients with covert carotid wall abnormalities, like carotid WEBs and ulcerated plaques, that are amenable to carotid stenting to reduce recurrent stroke risk.
GoyalMMenonBKVan ZwamWH, et al.Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet2016; 387: 1723–1731.
2.
CampbellBCVMaHRinglebPA, et al.Extending thrombolysis to 4.5-9h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet2019; 394: 139–147.
3.
JovinTGNogueiraRGLansbergMG, et al.Thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke beyond 6 h from time last known well (AURORA): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet2022; 399: 249–258.
4.
KhanevskiANBjerkreimATNovotnyV, et al.Recurrent ischemic stroke: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. Acta Neurol Scand2019; 140: 3–8.
5.
KolmosMChristoffersenLKruuseC. Recurrent ischemic stroke - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2021; 30: 105935.
6.
RaduRATerecoasăEOBăjenaruOA,et al.Etiologic classification of ischemic stroke: where do we stand?Clin Neurol Neurosurg2017; 159: 93–106.
7.
GuglielmiVCompagneKCJSarramiAH, et al.Assessment of recurrent stroke risk in patients with a carotid web. JAMA Neurol2021; 78: 826–833.
8.
SinghNMarkoMOspelJM,et al.The risk of stroke and TIA in nonstenotic carotid plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2020; 41: 1453–1459.
9.
PasarikovskiCRRamjistJda CostaL,et al.Optical coherence tomography as an adjunct during carotid artery stenting for carotid web. Neurol Clin Pract2019; 9: 484–486.
10.
DargazanliCMahmoudiMCappucciM, et al.Angiographic patterns and outcomes achieved by proximal balloon occlusion in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis stenting. Clin Neuroradiol2020; 30: 363–372.
11.
HartRGDienerHCCouttsSB, et al.Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. The Lancet Neurology2014; 13: 429–438.
12.
DienerH-CEastonJDHartRG,et al.Review and update of the concept of embolic stroke of undetermined source. Nat Rev Neurol. 2022; 18: 455–465.
13.
VeltkampRPearceLAKorompokiE, et al.Characteristics of recurrent ischemic stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol2020; 77: 1233–1240.
14.
KleindorferDOTowfighiAChaturvediS, et al. 2021Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52:e364–e467.
15.
AmerisoSFAmarencoPPearceLA, et al.Intracranial and systemic atherosclerosis in the NAVIGATE ESUS trial: recurrent stroke risk and response to antithrombotic therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2020; 29: 104936.
16.
ZhangAJDhruvPChoiP, et al.A systematic literature review of patients with carotid web and acute ischemic stroke. Stroke2018; 49: 2872–2876.
17.
HaussenDCGrossbergJABouslamaM, et al.Carotid web (intimal fibromuscular dysplasia) has high stroke recurrence risk and is amenable to stenting. Stroke2017; 48: 3134–3137.
18.
OushySFlemmingKDCloftH,et al.Use of intravascular optical coherence tomography to confirm the diagnosis of a carotid web in a patient with recurrent ipsilateral embolic strokes and evaluate the response to stenting. Interv Neuroradiol2022: 15910199221080878. DOI: 10.1177/15910199221080878.
19.
BrinsterCJVidalGBazanH, et al.Carotid web is an under-recognized and devastating cause of ischemic stroke. J Vasc Surg2021; 73: 43.
20.
BarralMDohanAMarcelinC, et al.COVID-19 pandemic: a stress test for interventional radiology. Diagn Interv Imaging2020; 101: 333–334.
21.
Kamtchum-TatueneJNomaniAZFalcioneS, et al.Non-stenotic carotid plaques in embolic stroke of unknown source. Front Neurol2021; 12. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.719329.
22.
KopczakASchindlerABayer-KarpinskaA, et al.Complicated carotid artery plaques as a cause of cryptogenic stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol2020; 76: 2212–2222.
23.
AnnaKAndreasSDominikS, et al.Complicated carotid artery plaques and risk of recurrent ischemic stroke or TIA. J Am Coll Cardiol2022; 79: 2189–2199.
24.
EliasziwMStreiflerJYFoxAJ,et al.Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Stroke1994; 25: 304–308.
25.
ParaskevasKIVeithFJSpenceJD. How to identify which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis could benefit from endarterectomy or stenting. Stroke Vasc Neurol2018; 3: 92–100.
26.
ShindoSFujiiKShirakawaM, et al.Morphologic features of carotid plaque rupture assessed by optical coherence tomography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2015; 36: 2140–2146.
27.
GounisMJUghiGJMarosfoiM, et al.Intravascular optical coherence tomography for neurointerventional surgery. Stroke2019; 50: 218–223.
