The safety and efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in distal vessel occlusion (DVO) are not well described. We aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of EVT in patients with DVO.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive DVOs (defined as M3/M4, A1/A2, and P1/P2 occlusion) who underwent EVT within 24 h since last known well. The primary efficacy outcome was successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥ 2B). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization with ≤3 passes. The safety outcome measures included the rate of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), all intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH).
Results
A total of 72 patients with DVO was identified: 39 (54%) with M3/M4, 13 (18%) with A1/A2, and 20 (28%) with P1/P2 occlusions. Admission NIHSS score median (IQR) was 12 (11), and 90% of the patients had baseline mRS ≤ 2. Thirty-six percent of the patients received intravenous thrombolytic therapy. Successful recanalization was achieved in 90% of the patients. The median number of passes was 2, with successful recanalization achieved with ≤3 passes in 83% of the patients. ICH was seen in 16% of the patients, including three SAHs. However, only one patient (1.4%) had sICH. Among 48 patients in whom 90-day outcome data were available, 33 (53.2%) had favorable clinical outcome (mRS ≤ 3). In a multivariable logistic regression, only baseline NIHSS was identified as an independent predictor of poor outcome.
Conclusion
This single-center real-world experience demonstrates that EVT in patients with DVO stroke is safe and feasible and may lead to improved clinical outcome.
GoyalMMenonBKvan ZwamWH, et al.Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet2016; 387: 1723–1731. 20160218.
2.
MausVHüskenSKalousekV, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy in acute terminal internal carotid artery occlusions using a large manually expandable stentretriever (tiger XL device): multicenter initial experience. J Clin Med2021; 10: 20210827.
3.
PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonT, et al.Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2019; 50: e344–e418. 20191030.
4.
ChenCJWangCBuellTJ, et al.Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute middle cerebral artery M2 segment occlusion: a systematic review. World Neurosurg2017; 107: 684–691. 20170824.
5.
Delgado AcostaFJiménez GómezEBravo ReyI, et al.Comparing data from thrombectomy in m2 occlusion and proximal middle cerebral artery. Interv Neuroradiol 2023; 29: 102–107. DOI: 10.1177/15910199221074881.
6.
DornFLockauHStetefeldH, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy of M2-occlusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2015; 24: 1465–1470. 20150504.
7.
SaberHNarayananSPallaM, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery: a meta-analysis. J Neurointerv Surg2018; 10: 620–624. 20171110.
8.
SarrajASanghaNHussainMS, et al.Endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery M2 segment. JAMA Neurol2016; 73: 1291–1296.
9.
PfaffJHerwehCPhamM, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy of distal occlusions in the anterior cerebral artery: recanalization rates, periprocedural complications, and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2016; 37: 673–678. 20151105.
10.
SaverJLChapotRAgidR, et al.Thrombectomy for distal, Medium vessel occlusions: a consensus statement on present knowledge and promising directions. Stroke2020; 51: 2872–2884. 20200806.
11.
SweidAHeadJTjoumakarisS, et al.Mechanical thrombectomy in distal vessels: revascularization rates, complications, and functional outcome. World Neurosurg2019; 130: e1098–e1104. 20190716.
12.
KunzWGAlmekhlafiMAGoyalM. Distal vessel occlusions: when to consider endovascular thrombectomy. Stroke2018; 49: 1581–1583. 20180618.
13.
CrockettMTPhillipsTJChiuAHY. Dual suction Headway27 microcatheter thrombectomy for the treatment of distal intracranial arterial occlusion strokes: initial experience with the micro-ADAPT technique. J Neurointerv Surg2019; 11: 714–718. 20181124.
14.
VargasJSpiottaAMFargenK, et al.Experience with A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) for thrombectomy in distal cerebral artery occlusions causing acute ischemic stroke. World Neurosurg2017; 99: 31–36. 20161129.
15.
GrossbergJARebelloLCHaussenDC, et al.Beyond large vessel occlusion strokes: distal occlusion thrombectomy. Stroke2018; 49: 1662–1668. 20180618.
16.
GiboHCarverCCRhotonALJr., et al.Microsurgical anatomy of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurosurg1981; 54: 151–169.
17.
HackeWKasteMFieschiC, et al.Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian acute stroke study investigators. Lancet1998; 352: 1245–1251.
18.
WirtzMMHendrixPGorenO, et al.Predictor of 90-day functional outcome after mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion stroke: NIHSS score of 10 or less at 24 hours. J Neurosurg2019: 1–7. 20191220. DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.Jns191991.
19.
WoutersANystenCThijsV, et al.Prediction of outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke based on initial severity and improvement in the first 24 h. Front Neurol2018; 9: 308. 20180507.
20.
MatsoukasSMoreyJLockG, et al.AI Software detection of large vessel occlusion stroke on CT angiography: a real-world prospective diagnostic test accuracy study. J Neurointerv Surg2023; 15: 52–56. 20220127.
21.
LapergueBBlancRGoryB, et al.Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. Jama2017; 318: 443–452.
22.
TurkAS3rdSiddiquiAFifiJT, et al.Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial. Lancet2019; 393: 998–1008.
23.
DargazanliCFahedRBlancR, et al.Modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2C/thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 3 reperfusion should be the aim of mechanical thrombectomy: insights from the ASTER trial (contact aspiration versus stent retriever for successful revascularization). Stroke2018; 49: 1189–1196. 20180406.
24.
KaesmacherJMaegerleinCZiboldF, et al.Improving mTICI2b reperfusion to mTICI2c/3 reperfusions: a retrospective observational study assessing technical feasibility, safety and clinical efficacy. Eur Radiol2018; 28: 274–282. 20170727.
25.
OlivotJMMlynashMInoueM, et al.Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort. Stroke2014; 45: 1018–1023. 20140304.
26.
CampbellBCChristensenSTressBM, et al.Failure of collateral blood flow is associated with infarct growth in ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2013; 33: 1168–1172. 20130508.
27.
GuenegoAFahedRAlbersGW, et al.Hypoperfusion intensity ratio correlates with angiographic collaterals in acute ischaemic stroke with M1 occlusion. Eur J Neurol2020; 27: 864–870. 20200313.
28.
GuenegoAMarcellusDGMartinBW, et al.Hypoperfusion intensity ratio is correlated with patient eligibility for thrombectomy. Stroke2019; 50: 917–922.
29.
GuenegoAFaroukiYMineB, et al.Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct growth after successful thrombectomy for distal medium vessel occlusion. Clin Neuroradiol; 32: 849–856. DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01141-6.
30.
AlbersGWMarksMPKempS, et al.Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med2018; 378: 708–718. 20180124.
31.
NogueiraRGJadhavAPHaussenDC, et al.Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med2018; 378: 11–21. 20171111.
