Air emission inventory of container ports’ cargo handling equipment with activity-based “bottom-up” method

Abstract

With the rapid development of China’s container port industry, the emissions of air pollutants in port areas have been increasing. Cargo handling equipment as a non-road mobile source of emissions has become a focus of public attention. This article adopted a full activity-based “bottom-up” method to establish the inventory of emissions by cargo handling equipment at a container port. Drawing on the OFFROAD model, we conducted investigation and analysis of cargo handling equipment holdings, activity levels, and equipment-related parameters and modified the emission factors. The Nanjing Longtan Container Port was taken as a case study. Results show that in 2014, emissions by cargo handling equipment of the Nanjing Longtan Container Port were as follows: PM₁₀ 4.25 t, PM_2.5 3.91 t, NO_x 82.98 t, SO_x 1.06 t, CO 23.84 t, and HC 16.39 t, all lower than results from an earlier research based on 2013 fuel consumption data. Cargo handling equipment produced more PM and HC emissions than any other emission source at the port. The method and main conclusions of this article provide support for future work on energy conservation and emission reduction in port areas.

Keywords

Air emission inventory container port bottom-up method cargo handling equipment

Air pollutant emissions at a container port mainly come from three sources: vessels, cargo handling equipment (CHE), and heavy-duty vehicles.¹ Among them, pollutants from CHE mainly include PM, NO_x, HC, CO_x, SO_x, and other emissions that are toxic and harmful. These pollutants have negative impacts on the regional air quality, climate change, and human health.^2–5

Countries including the United States and Switzerland^6,7 have developed official non-road mobile source emissions inventory. Z Samaras and KH Zierock⁸ adopted the method of emission factors—based on power, equipment’s engine activity, fuel type, and engine type—to calculate EU non-road mobile source emissions of atmospheric pollutants in 1990, compared the results with pollutant emissions of on-road mobile sources, and proved that non-road emissions were a major source of atmospheric pollution; Kean et al.⁹ estimated NO_x and PM emissions of non-road mobile sources of the United States of 1996 with the method based on fuel consumption; M Lindgren and PA Hansson¹⁰ studied the effects of transient operating conditions on emissions of non-road diesel engine and it was concluded that the air fuel ratio had an important influence on the formation of the emission under the transient load; and P Lewis et al.¹¹ adopted OFFROAD model of the USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) to study on the emission characteristics of non-road diesel engine with various emission data sources.

For the implementation of the San Pedro Bay Ports of the clean air action plan (CAAP) in the United States, the first global port emission inventory was compiled in the Port of Long Beach in 2004. On such a basis, in 2005, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) officially promulgated CHE management regulations and established non-road mobile source emission simulation method. On the basis of traditional OFFROAD model, they adjusted the calculation formulas of deterioration rate as an important influence parameter.¹² Compared with the road motor vehicle emission standards started in 1999, the emission control of non-road mobile sources in China started later.¹³ National standard to limit exhaust emission from diesel engines of non-road mobile machinery was not released until 2007 and now the third as well as the fourth issue of emission regulations have been reached. However, the newest standard did not make any special provision on the emission limits of CHE diesel engine, just subsumed them into the scope of construction machinery instead, which would lead to the lack of clear indicators for the implementation of emission standards in port. Emission inventory is an important basis for emission control and environmental management. Compared to some developed countries’ matured emission inventory, the related researches in this field are still in the initial stage, especially the systematic researches on the emission of CHE are still scarce at present in China.

D Li et al.¹³ referred to the basic method of non-road mobile source emission simulation by EPA’s NONROAD model and proposed the estimating method of pollutant emissions as well as fuel consumption of construction machinery for the first time based on the actual fuel consumption rate. As a result, they estimated fuel consumption and emissions of two types of typical construction machinery, excavator and loader in China in 2007. L Zhang et al.¹⁴ investigated five types of non-road mobile sources in nine cities of the Pearl River Delta and adopted emission factor method based on fuel consumption to establish a list of non-road mobile source emission, which drew public attention to NO_x emissions of the non-road mobile sources. X Kui¹⁵ used the fuel consumption method, and average emission factors from results of other studies of reference, to establish the non-road mobile source emission inventory with the help of provincial yearbook of Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region after getting date of districts and counties through distribute city-level data on a pro-rata basis and summarizing the activity data of construction machinery and other non-road mobile sources. The article also supplemented and improved emission source preparation work of the Region through gridding the emission inventory data and making qualitative analysis on the result.

There are few researches on CHE emission inventory, except for those of H Tan et al.⁵ and X Jia et al.¹⁶ In the former paper, a revised and localized calculation method was put forward on the basis of comprehensive analysis of literatures and the investigation results of various CHE in Shanghai port. The emission inventory of air pollutants from the CHE in Shanghai Port in 2010 was established. At the same time, some measures were proposed to reduce emissions and some suggestions were proposed to further improve the emission calculation. The latter paper is the previous research results of this article. The local pollutant emission factor was selected on the basis of the field investigation results of various CHE in Nanjing Longtan Container Port (NLCP). The emission inventory of air pollutants from the CHE in NLCP in 2013 was calculated by adopting fuel consumption method.

Overall, to develop the emission inventory of CHE based on fuel consumption was common practice in the existing researches (called top-down approach). There is another top-down method based on the atmospheric environment pollution samples, using the analytical model of various sources, parsing out the contributions of different emission sources of pollutants to perform source apportionment. The former neglects various activity data of different kinds of equipment and the equipment’s power, using hours, deterioration rate, and effects of different fuels, which leads to ambiguous emission characteristics and non-targeted measures to emission reduction. The latter cannot be implemented due to the lack of local emission source characteristic spectrum in China. On the other hand, some of the western countries have set local emission factor databases to build CHE’s emission inventory (called bottom-up approach), which can overcome the weaknesses of the top-down approaches, and has been proved an efficient way to solve environmental problems.¹⁷

In this article, the bottom-up method based on activity was used. Local emission factors of CHE in container terminals were revised from the emission factor database of port of Long Beach, and other necessary factors, such as equipment power, using hours, deterioration degree, model year, engine type, the sulfur content of diesel fuel, and already used emission reduction technologies, were comprehensively taken into consideration to set up the emission inventory. NLCP was taken as a case, and the air emission inventory of CHE in 2014 was established according to the relevant data collection. In order to provide a basis for the prevention and control of air pollution in the port area, the emission results were analyzed and discussed with alternative emission reduction measurements.

Activity-based air emission inventory

Air emission inventory

The air emission inventory is a list of one or more kinds of the pollutant emissions from various sources, in a certain geographical area and a certain period of time, and plays an important role in identifying the air pollution source and the trend of evolution in the concerned area as well as using air quality model to study the formation mechanism of pollutants and formulating the control measures of air pollution prevention, which has become one of the key scientific methods for air pollution control and prevention.

Bottom-up method based on activities

To establish the emission inventory, we focus on the emission of equipment’s activity. That is, according to the total number of each kind of CHE (including the engine production year, the energy type, and equipment deterioration degree), the active power of a single device, equipment’s engine activity hours per year, emission factors and fuel correction factors (FCFs), control factors, emission reduction measures as well as other related information, the pollutant emissions of CHE were estimated one by one. Taking equipment activity and engine load into consideration, the method used in this article is a kind of bottom-up method based on activity.

With this bottom-up method based on activity, each parameter will be described in the following sections. The equation to estimate CHE emissions is given in section “Emissions estimation methodology,” and the next section describes the emission factors and associated parameters. Control factors are given in section “CHE emissions reduction technologies and control factors,” where the changes in emissions due to the use of various technologies are clearly reflected. The equipment list, the activity record, load factors and FCFs, and so on have been given in the case study part.

Establishment of air pollutant emissions inventory from CHE

Research method

Common CHE includes reach stacker, forklift, container trailer, empty container handler, the bridge crane, and rubber tired gantry (RTG) crane. The inventory includes CHE powered by diesel, gasoline, and electricity. In this article, port district was the research scope, and the equipment driven by electricity was not calculated in emission inventory. Bottom-up method based on activity was adopted as emission estimating method.

Equipment information and related parameters, such as equipment type, equipment ID, rated power of the engine, model year, engine type, cumulative running hours, and annual operating hours, were obtained by investigation (such as distribution and collection of questionnaires, observing and recording equipment activity times, and consulting ledger) and analysis with database software.

Emissions estimation methodology

The bottom-up method based on activity is a more accurate method for development of port emissions inventory.^17,18 Equipment was divided into groups by engine fuel type, and pollutant emission factors were established on the basis of equipment model year as well as the engine power. FCFs and control factors were established through detailed investigation of fuel quality and emission reduction measures. The emissions calculation methodology used to estimate CHE emissions is consistent with CARB’s latest methodology for estimating emissions from CHE.¹⁷ The basic equation used to estimate CHE emissions is as follows

E_{i, j, k, l, m} = P o p_{i, j, k, l} \times P o w e r_{i, j, k, l} \times A c t i v i t y_{i, j, k, l} \times L F_{i} \times E F_{i, j, k, l, m} \times F C F_{l, m} \times C F_{j}

(1)

where E = emissions, grams/year; Pop = Population (number of a particular CHE type in the port); Power = rated power of the engine, kW; Activity = equipment’s engine activity, h/year; LF = load factor (ratio of average load used during normal operations as compared to full load at maximum rated horsepower), dimensionless; EF = emission factor, grams of pollutant per unit of work, g/(kW h); FCF = fuel correction factor to reflect changes in fuel properties that have occurred over time, dimensionless; CF = control factor to reflect changes in emissions due to installation of emission reduction technologies not originally reflected in the emission factors, dimensionless; i, j, k, l, m = CHE type, engine type, engine power, equipment model year, and characterized pollutants; E_i_,j,k,l,m = CHE emission whose engine type is j, engine power is k, equipment production year is l, CHE type is i, and calculating pollutant is m.

Emission factor

The emission factor is a function of the zero-hour emission rate by fuel type (diesel or liquefied natural gas (LNG)), CHE engine type, model year, deterioration rate, and cumulative hours. The deterioration rate reflects the fact that the engine’s zero-hour emission rates change as the equipment is used, due to wear of various engine parts or reduced efficiency of emission control devices. The cumulative hours reflect the CHE engine’s total operating hours.¹⁷ The emission factor is calculated as follows

E F_{i, j, k, l, m} = Z H_{i, j, k, l, m} + (D R_{i, j, k, l, m} \times C H_{i, j, k, l})

(2)

where ZH = zero-hour emission rate by fuel type by CHE engine type for a given power category and model year, g/(kW h); DR = deterioration rate (rate of change of emissions as a function of CHE engine age), g/(kW h²); and CH = cumulative hours, number of hours the CHE engine has been in use and calculated as annual operating hours times age of the CHE engine, hour.

CH was obtained by the equipment list, and ZH and DR of single equipment obtained from Starcrest Consulting Group¹⁷ according to equipment engine energy type (LNG, diesel, etc.), production type, and the category of rated power, which were obtained by the survey.

CHE emission factors based on activity need a large number of measured data, and it can only be obtained by statistical analysis method. In China, there is no basis for such research at present. Therefore, a revised and localized calculation method referring to OFFROAD model was put forward in this article on the basis of comprehensive analysis of literatures and taking various CHE activity information into consideration.

CHE emission reduction technologies and control factors

Emissions are revised according to the energy-saving and emission reduction measures implemented in ports in China, such as the technologies “converting diesel to LNG” or “converting diesel to electricity.” As such, CHE at ports are classified by their source of power and control factors are specified accordingly. Control factors are used to reflect the changes in emissions due to the use of various technologies mentioned above. The emission reduction percentages associated with the various emission reduction strategies can be verified by the actual situation in the port, subtracting which from 1.0 is the control factor. For example, a technology that achieves an emission reduction of 70%, or 0.70, will have a control factor of 0.3 (1.0 − 0.7 = 0.3). In this article, for the hybrid (diesel and electricity) equipment, the emission reduction measures will be revised by the actual operating time of diesel fuel.

Case analysis

Research object and scope

The NLCP is along Yangtze River downstream, located in Longtan district, about 30 km from the city of Nanjing. Typical operating equipment in the port includes bridge cranes, RTG cranes, reach stackers, empty container handlers, container trailers, and forklifts. Among them, bridge cranes are used for the loading and unloading operations of vessels, container trailers are used for container horizontal movements from the wharf apron to the yard, RTGs and reach stackers are used for handling and stacking container in the yard, and container handlers are suitable for empty container handling. Geographical location and typical CHE of the NLCP are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

NLCP location and typical CHE.

There are 94 equipment in NLCP, including 22 RTG cranes, 6 reach stackers, 14 container handlers, 30 container trailers, and 22 forklifts (due to the emission reduction measures of diesel to gas, emissions of the bridge crane are zero and not included in the emission inventory). We choose the container trailers as an example, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Equipment information list of NLCP (container trailers as an example).

Equipment number	Power (kW)	Equipment model year	Engine type	Operating hours per year	Cumulative hours	Emission reduction measures
LCT525	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500	–
LCT526	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT527	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT528	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT529	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT530	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT532	177	2007	Diesel	3500	24,500
LCT533	177	2008	Diesel	3600	21,200
LCT536	177	2008	Diesel	3600	21,200
LCT544	177	2010	Diesel	3600	15,600
LCT547	193	2011	Diesel	4900	14,700
LCT548	193	2011	Diesel	4900	14,700
LCT549	193	2011	Diesel	4900	14,700
LCT550	193	2011	Diesel	4900	14,700
LCT551	170	2013	Diesel	4800	9800
LCT552	170	2013	Diesel	4800	9800
LCT553	170	2013	Diesel	4800	9800
LCT554	170	2013	Diesel	4800	9800
LCT531	205	2007	LNG	3500	24,500	Converting diesel to gas
LCT534	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT535	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT537	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT538	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT539	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT540	205	2008	LNG	3600	21,200
LCT541	205	2010	LNG	3600	15,600
LCT542	205	2010	LNG	3600	15,600
LCT543	205	2010	LNG	3600	15,600
LCT545	205	2010	LNG	3600	15,600
LCT546	205	2010	LNG	3600	15,600

NLCP: Nanjing Longtan Container Port; LNG: liquefied natural gas.

Handling technology

The operation flow at the NLCP is summarized as follows: when the container ship is at the berth, containers are grabbed by the bridge crane from the ship and they are put onto the waiting container trailers, which will transport the containers to the rear yard, and ultimately the containers will be stacked to the specified location by the RTGs or reach stackers as an auxiliary. For the container to be transported out of the port gate, it will be hoisted and loaded to the container truck by the RTGs or reach stackers as an auxiliary. And the truck carries the container to each destination. The order to unload containers from the port and load them into the ship is the opposite. This operation flow is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Containers handling process at NLCP.

Parameter selection

The rated power of equipment is obtained by field investigation. Multiply engine load factors of different types of machinery on the basis of rated power. Table 2 lists the load factors for specified CHE, including reach stacker, forklift, container trailer, empty container handler, the bridge crane, and RTG crane.

Table 2.

Cargo handling equipment engine load factors.¹⁷

CHE type	Load factor
RTG	0.20
Forklift	0.30
Container handler	0.59
Reach stacker	0.51
Container trailer	0.39

RTG: rubber tired gantry; CHE: cargo handling equipment.

FCF reflect the influence of changes in diesel products on the pollutant emission ratio of different year types of equipment engine. It was found in the investigation that CHE of the NLCP used Chinese No. 0 diesel with maximum sulfur content of 350 ppm. According to the ultra-low sulfur diesel FCF in the literature,¹⁷ localization correction has been made by linear interpolation (for the diesel with a sulfur content of 350 ppm), thereby obtaining the FCF for the equipment model year we need. We use FCF revised by CARB. The engine energy for LNG equipment was not taken into account.¹⁷ They are shown in Table 3.

Table 3.

Fuel correction factors.

Equipment model year	PM	NO_x	SO_x	CO	HC	CO₂
1996–2010	1.336	1.087	2.495	1.000	1.470	1.000
2011 and newer	1.249	1.087	2.495	1.000	1.470	1.000

The production year of typical equipment’s engine was between 1996 and 2014. The zero-hour emission and deterioration rates were obtained by combining the equipment’s information with CARB’s latest emission calculation methodology for CHE.¹⁷ Emission factors were estimated. Table 4 gives the result on container trailers as an example.

Table 4.

2014 NLCP CHE emission factors (container trailers as an example).

CHE type	Pop	Power (kW)	Cumulative hours	Emission factor (g/(k Wh))
CHE type	Pop	Power (kW)	Cumulative hours	PM₁₀	PM_2.5	NO_x	SO_x	CO	HC	CO₂
Container trailer	4	170	9800	0.0183	0.0165	2.0565	0.08	1.5494	0.3344	762
	1	177	15,600	0.2661	0.2449	3.9507	0.08	1.7384	0.6531	762
	2	177	21,200	0.3077	0.2832	4.1895	0.08	1.9209	0.8408	762
	7	177	24,500	0.3401	0.3129	7.9498	0.08	2.0285	0.9484	762
	4	193	14,700	0.2594	0.2387	3.9123	0.08	1.7091	0.6229	762
	5	205	15,600	0.0000	0.0000	3.5500	0	0.0900	0.6711	662
	6	205	21,200	0.0000	0.0000	3.5500	0	0.0900	0.8438	662
	1	205	24,500	0.0000	0.0000	3.5500	0	0.0900	0.9456	662

NLCP: Nanjing Longtan Container Port; CHE: cargo handling equipment.

Some of the pollutant emission factors are reduced to zero when liquefied natural gas is used by the equipment engine.

Results and discussion

2014 NLCP CHE emission inventory by equipment type

2014 NLCP CHE emissions by equipment type were calculated according to the foregoing method in this article and presented in Table 5.

Table 5.

2014 NLCP CHE emission inventory by equipment type (tons).

Equipment type	Pop	PM₁₀	PM_2.5	NO_x	SO₂	CO	HC
RTG	22.00	0.11	0.10	1.31	0.03	0.44	0.40
Reach stacker	6.00	0.82	0.75	10.82	0.33	3.55	2.24
Container handler	14.00	1.37	1.26	26.72	0.83	7.69	4.06
Container trailer	30.00	1.57	1.44	40.38	1.04	9.62	9.14
Forklift	22.00	0.40	0.37	3.76	0.10	2.54	0.55
Total	94	4.25	3.91	82.98	2.33	23.84	16.39

NLCP: Nanjing Longtan Container Port; CHE: cargo handling equipment; RTG: rubber tired gantry.

CO₂ and other greenhouse gases do not belong to the atmospheric pollution and therefore they are separately listed in Table 6 instead of Table 5.

Table 6.

2014 NLCP CHE CO₂ emissions by equipment type (tons).

Equipment type	Pop	CO₂
RTG	22	146.741
Reach stacker	6	1401.61
Container handler	14	3173.81
Container trailer	30	6232.13
Forklift	22	399.821
Total	94	11,354.1

NLCP: Nanjing Longtan Container Port; CHE: cargo handling equipment; RTG: rubber tired gantry.

Results show that 2014 NLCP CHE totally emitted PM₁₀ 4.25 t, PM_2.5 3.91 t, NO_x 82.98 t, SO_x 1.06 t, CO₂ 3.84 t, and HC 16.39 t, among which NO_x contributed the highest percentage of air pollutant (60.60%). CO was the second highest percentage, 17.41% (Table 5).

Figure 3 presents the percentage of CHE emissions by equipment type. Container trailers’ contribution rate of total CHE PM₁₀, PM_2.5, NO_x, SO_x, CO, and HC emissions are, respectively, 36.9%, 36.9%, 48.7%, 51.4%, 40.4%, and 55.8%, accounting for most of the emissions. Container handlers and reach stackers account for most of the remainder of the emissions.

Figure 3.

Emission shares of CHE of criteria pollutants (%).

Figure 4 presents the percentage of CHE emissions by pollutant type. Among the pollutant emissions of every CHE, NO_x shows the greatest contribution. It contributes 46.67% of total forklift pollutant emissions, 62.8% of total container trailer pollutant emissions, 62.26% of total container handler pollutant emissions, 56.71% of total reach stacker pollutant emissions, and 50.33% of total RTG pollutant emissions. CO and CH take the second place. Particulate matter emissions are smaller than other air pollutants emitted by CHE.

Figure 4.

Emission shares of criteria pollutants of CHE (%).

In the literature,¹⁹ four port-related mobile source categories of NLCP were analyzed, as shown in Figure 5. CHE is the main contribution source of HC, PM, and CO in the port, which contributes 59% of total HC emissions, 51.86% of total PM₁₀ emissions, 55% of total PM_2.5 emissions, and 41.29% of total CO emissions. CHE is the main emission source of particulate matter and carbon emissions.

Figure 5.

Emission shares of four port-related mobile source categories of criteria pollutants at NLCP (%).

Figure 6 presents CO₂ emissions. Container trailers are the main contribution source of CHE, and container handlers come second.

Figure 6.

CO₂ emissions of CHE in NLCP.

Comparative analysis of related researches

According to the analysis of the previous research results of this article, 2013 NLCP CHE air pollutant emissions from the literature¹⁶ using the fuel consumption method were as follows: NO_x 230.0 t, CO 190.05 t, PM₁₀ 28.80 t, and SO_x 17.40 t, which can be seen higher than the result of this article. An important factor is the technical schemes for the energy-saving in rubber tired type of container gantry cranes (RTG) and other cranes in recent years. Engine types of the bridge crane were entirely changed from diesel into electricity, as well as a few power of RTG cranes were changed from diesel into electricity. Diesel-electric hybrid-driven technology which combines a diesel engine and an electric motor together has been used in most RTG and received significant breakthrough in emission reduction, in which the CO and NO_x emissions were reduced to about 68%. And emissions of particulate matter, sulfur oxide, and so on also largely decreased. In addition, the proportion of container trailer emissions was also more significant, especially reflected in the completed emission reduction innovation (100% RTGs adapt E-RTG conversion methods, consisting of the bus bar, touch wire, and cable reel systems; 40% container trailers adapt “converting diesel to gas” method) of this article. Overall, it is of great effectiveness to use clean energy to control the pollutant emissions and to further improve the using proportion of clean energy is a major task of port energy conservation and emission reduction. Compared with the literature of X Jia et al.¹⁶ which adopted fuel consumption method, equipment engine types using LNG and diesel-electric hybrid-driven technology were not taken into consideration when calculating, and fuel emission factor value used in calculation was an average level. The accuracy of the calculation results was somewhat short. However, quantitative analysis could be made on the single type of equipment and qualitative analysis could be made on the whole.

Improvement measures suggestions

In order to reduce pollutant emissions, the container trailer “diesel to gas” or crane “diesel to electricity” process should be promoted as soon as possible. Compared with RTG, the rail-mounted container gantry crane (RMG) in yard has the superiority and market prospect than rubber tired one in yard occupying rate, operation cost, working efficiency, safety, and environment protection.²⁰ RMG should be given priority in yard operation of RTG. Magnetizer with controllable magnetic strength could be adopted to make magnetization treatment, and by taking advantage of excellent performance of the lubricating diesel to reduce friction, component life will increase, fuel consumption of engine will decrease, and pollutant emissions will decrease too. Accelerate the implementation of the engine “to optimize the fuel + SCR (selective catalytic reduction) technology roadmap” and control the emission of PM and NO_x.²¹

Conclusion and prospects

In this article, bottom-up method based on activity has been chosen as emission estimation methodology, 2014 NLCP CHE emission inventory has been established, and emission of all pollutants and their emission characteristics have been analyzed.

Calculation results show that 2014 NLCP CHE totally emitted PM₁₀ 4.25 t, PM_2.5 3.91 t, NO_x 82.98 t, SO_x 1.06 t, CO23.84 t, and HC 16.39 t, among which NO_x contributed the highest percentage of air pollutant (60.60%). CO contributed the second highest percentage, 17.41%. Container trailers were the largest contribution source of CHE. CHE (41.29%) and vessels (35.72%) accounted for the majority of CO emissions. And CHE accounted for the majority of PM emissions (PM₁₀ 51.86%, PM_2.5 55%).

Present situation analysis. As China has not yet established a system of equipment emission factor preparation method, and has still lacked a large number of measured activity data of CHE, studies on the establishment of emission inventory on CHE and the whole port-related mobile source categories have still referred to mature research from other countries. A refined set of emission inventory system has not been formed in China. Based on the domestic and foreign literature statistics, this article constructs the corresponding emission factors and parameter correction factors based on the parameter information and activity information obtained from the port survey, so as to find the maximum matching model of the equipment. In addition, the FCF is based on domestic and foreign literature survey, integrated after the conversion is applicable to the current stage of non-road mobile source emission limit specification factor, not a separate consideration of specific equipment’s sulfur content of diesel, but access to the average conversion, there is uncertainty.

In the case of permission, further monitoring investigations are needed to obtain reliable emission factor basis data to provide a basis for the correction of localized emission factors.

Footnotes

Academic Editor: Yongjun Shen

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Research for this paper was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC; Nos 41401120, 51009060, and 50909042) and Social Science Foundation of Jiangsu province (No. 14JD014).

References

Wen

. China’s port pollution prevention should be accelerated into the right track. China Ports 2015; 11: 19–21.

Zhang

Shao

. Study on the environmental problems and countermeasures in Chinese ports. China Environ Manage 2008; 1: 26–29.

Yin

. Present situation and development trend of port development in China. China Ports 1999; 5: 5–6.

Bai

. Perspective of the current situation of the development of China’s Mainland ports. Log Eng Manage 2005; 1: 22–26.

Tan

Liu

Shen

. Emission inventory of air pollutants from cargo handling equipment. Environ Sci Manage 2013; 6: 82–87.

Federal Office for the Environment. Non-road fuel consumption and pollutant emissions, study for the period from 1980 to 2020. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment, 2008.

US Environmental Protection Agency. NONROAD model (Non-road engines equipment and vehicles [EB/OL]), http://www.epa.gov/otaq/nonrdmdl.htm (accessed 4 August 2010).

Samaras

Zierock

. Off-road vehicles: a comparison of emissions with those from road transport. Sci Total Environ 1995; 169: 249–255.

Kean

Sawyer

Harley

. A fuel-based assessment of off-road diesel engine emissions. J Air Waste Manage 2000; 50: 1929–1939.

10.

Lindgren

Hansson

. Effects of transient conditions on exhaust emissions from two non-road diesel engines. Biosyst Eng 2004; 87: 57–66.

11.

Lewis

Rasdorf

Frey

. Requirements and incentives for reducing construction vehicle emissions and comparison of non-road diesel engine emissions data sources. J Constr Eng M 2009; 135: 341–351.

12.

Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC. The port of Long Beach air emission inventory for calendar year 2005. Report, The Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, 2007.

13.

Zhou

. Fuel consumption and emission inventory of typical construction equipment in China. Environm Sci 2012; 2: 518–524.

14.

Zhang

Zheng

Yin

. Development of non-road mobile source emission inventory for the Pearl River Delta Region. Environm Sci 2010; 31: 886–891.

15.

Kui

. Establishment of a list of non-road mobile source emission in Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei. In: Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference of the Chinese academy of environmental sciences, Yunnan, Kunming, 1 August 2013, vol. 3, p.7. Beijing: China Environmental Science Society.

16.

Jia

Feng

Jiang

. Research of air pollutants from cargo handling equipment. J East China Jiaotong Univ 2014; 3: 12–17.

17.

Starcrest Consulting Group, LLC. The port of Long Beach air emission inventory for calendar year 2013. Report, The Port of Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, 2014.

18.

Shen

Zhang

. On the ship pollutant emission inventory in Shanghai port. J Saf Environ 2012; 5: 57–64.

19.

Feng

Wang

Zhang

. Research of emission inventory and monitoring of the large-scale port in Jiangsu Province. Nanjing, China: Hohai University, 2015.

20.

Geng

. Research of containers environmentally handling technology and device optimized configuration. Master Dissertation, Taiyuan University of Science and Technology, Taiyuan, China, 2014.

21.

Dong

. Research on the control strategy of SCR technology for reducing NOx emission of vehicle diesel engine. Doctor Dissertation, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2009.