Abstract
Introduction
Definitive treatment of symptomatic atheromatous internal carotid artery occlusion remains controversial, as far as in rare cases, late spontaneous recanalization has been seen.
Methods
We consecutively studied 182 patients (January 2003 to August 2012) with an ischemic stroke in the internal carotid artery territory and diagnosis of atheromatous internal carotid artery occlusion during hospitalization.
Findings
Seven patients presented a late spontaneous recanalization (>3 months) of the internal carotid artery. We described therapeutic attitude according to usual care in these patients.
Conclusions
The authors attempt to highlight the unusual condition of recanalization after a symptomatic atheromatous chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. If these patients can be treated similar to patients with asymptomatic carotid pathology, then this needs to be clarified. However, due to the risk of ipsi- and contralateral ischemic strokes, revascularization techniques should be considered in certain cases. More studies are needed to establish the most appropriate therapeutical approach in order to avoid arbitrary treatment of these patients.
Introduction
Definitive treatment of symptomatic chronic atheromatous internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion remains controversial, as far as in rare cases, late spontaneous recanalization has been described. We describe therapeutic attitude according to usual care in seven patients with late recanalization (>3 months), and we review similar cases described in the literature.
Methods
We studied consecutive patients with ischemic stroke admitted to the University Hospital of Oviedo (Spain) from January 2003 to August 2012. Inclusion criteria were ischemic stroke in the ICA territory, diagnosis of ICA occlusion during hospitalization using angiographic sequences of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA), and atheromatous etiology. Exclusion criteria were interventional treatment at the time of admittance or during hospitalization, patients with previously known ICA occlusion, and ICA occlusion of etiology other than atheromatous. Patients with a diagnosis of ICA occlusion made using duplex echography without confirmation by other angiographic study were also excluded. After discharge, patients were followed up by carotid duplex. We defined late recanalization as more than three months from the initial diagnosis. If recanalization was suspected, a complementary angiographic study (MRA or CTA) was performed in order to avoid the possibility of mistaking a near occlusion of the ICA by echography. Because of its cost, availability, and efficacy, CTA was more frequently used than MRA. The CTA was obtained with a 64 multidetector-array technology in helicoidal with slice thickness 1.25 mm. Acquisition delay depended on the bolus test of 20 mL (15–20 s). Helical acquisition that started from the aortic arch to the circle of Willis was initiated 20 s after the start of injecting 120-mL nonionic contrast medium. Projections were reconstructed in axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. All images were analyzed by a neuroradiologist.
Results
An ICA occlusion was diagnosed in 182 patients; of these, symptomatic ICA occlusion was diagnosed in 162 patients. Eighteen (18/162) patients needed mechanical (17/18) or surgical (1/18) recanalization. Three (3/162) patients died due to an extensive hemispheric stroke (one of them after surgical treatment). Eight of 162 patients presented with dissection of the ICA, and 136/162 patients presented atheromatous ICA occlusion. Of the latter, seven patients presented a late spontaneous recanalization of the ICA (Figures 1 to 3). The cases are summarized in Table 1.
Patient 2—coronal sections of CT angiography showed a left ICA occlusion (a) and recanalization (b) (white arrows). Patient 5—longitudinal sections of CT angiography showed a left ICA occlusion (a) and recanalization (b) (white arrows). Patients with late spontaneous recanalization in our center. : years; ComPA: communicating posterior artery; ComAA: communicating anterior artery; ASA: acetyl salicylic acid; LMWH: low-molecular-weight heparin; CT: computed tomography; MCA: middle cerebral artery.

Discussion
Spontaneous late recanalization of atheromatous chronic ICA occlusion may be due to the natural fibrinolysis of superimposed occlusion in the setting of pre-existing severely stenotic ICA 1 or due to the presence of the vasa vasorum providing collateral circulation. 2 Apart from that, other factors take part in the recanalization: mechanism of occlusion, site of the occlusion, clot-size, composition, and age of the thromboembolic material. For all of these aspects, a late recanalization of atheromatous ICA occlusion is not a frequent event.
Patients described in the literature with late recanalization of previous internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion.
y: years; TIA: transient ischemic attack; CTA: computed tomography angiography; MRA: magnetic resonance angiography; ASA: acetyl salicylic acid.
In patients with asymptomatic ICA stenosis, medical treatment alone seems to be the best treatment for stroke prevention.9,10 However, recent studies which focused on the asymptomatic ICA stenosis support the idea that the combination of several factors may identify patients who will benefit from other therapeutic approaches apart from medical treatment. A complex atherosclerotic carotid plaque,11–13 positive cerebral CT findings such as silent infarcts,11–14 the degree of the carotid stenosis,11–13,15 disturbances in cerebral vasoreactivity, 13 or history of contralateral transient ischemic attacks 15 may identify those patients who will need interventional treatment.11–13 Moreover, patients with previous symptomatic carotid artery pathology would have a relatively unstable carotid plaque composition, with higher prevalence of intraplaque hemorrhage, compared with patients who have never experienced ipsilateral events. 8 It would suggest that patients with past events might have different long-term ipsilateral stroke risks. 8 For this reason, and due to the possibility of recanalization, patients with symptomatic atheromatous chronic ICA occlusion should deserve further attention.
After reviewing previously published clinical cases, medical treatment seems to be as effective as interventional treatment in these patients. Although these studies were performed in the chronic phase when thrombus could have disappeared, pathological studies described in the literature show atheromatous fibrous plaques or calcified carotid plaques without any sign of unstable carotid pathology.1,4–6 In addition to patients with asymptomatic carotid pathology, ischemic cerebrovascular events have been described in these patients with late recanalization: an ipsilateral ischemic event, such as the case described by Buslovich and Hines 6 or our second patient, or contralateral ischemic stroke, such as the case described by Camporese et al. 7 or our first patient, supports that in some cases, the prognosis would not be as benign as expected. Revascularization techniques should be considered in these cases to improve not only the ipsilateral hemispheric circulation but also the collateral circulation to the contralateral hemisphere.
The authors attempt to highlight the unusual condition of recanalization after a symptomatic atheromatous chronic ICA occlusion. If these patients can be treated similar to patients with asymptomatic carotid pathology, then this needs to be clarified. More studies are needed to establish the most appropriate therapeutical approach in order to avoid arbitrary treatment in these patients.
Patient 3—coronal sections of CT angiography showed a left ICA occlusion (a) and recanalization (b) (white arrows).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
