Abstract
Introduction
Aortoiliac arterial occlusive disease is frequently encountered in the management of lower limb vascular insufficiency. We report our experience with covered balloon-expandable stents for treatment of TASC D lesions of the abdominal aorta and common iliac arteries.
Methods
A retrospective study of 30 patients who underwent aortoiliac stenting with the Atrium Advanta V12 from March 2010 to September 2012 was conducted. Patient demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms and procedural details were recorded. Outcomes assessed were primary patency, secondary patency, technical success, complications, limb salvage and survival.
Results
Median age was 67 years (range 48–84) and 40% of patients underwent treatment for critical limb ischaemia. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 3–38 months). Stent configuration comprised of long iliac stents in 20 patients, a large diameter aortic stent with iliac stenting in six patients, and aortic stent alone in four patients. Radiological success was achieved in 100% and the complication rate was 6%. Primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months was 97%, 90% and 79%, respectively. Four cases of in-stent stenosis were reported, with three of these undergoing re-interventions resulting in a secondary patency rate of 97% at the end of follow-up. One patient death occurred within the follow-up period.
Discussion
This case series demonstrates that treatment of complex aortoiliac occlusive disease with covered balloon-expandable stents can have acceptable results with good patency and good clinical outcome. Secondary patency rates are comparable to open surgical revascularisation, with lower morbidity.
Keywords
Introduction
Aorto-iliac arterial occlusive disease is frequently encountered in the management of lower limb vascular insufficiency. It is well known that an open surgical approach is associated with greater morbidity and mortality, both for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Surgical reconstruction is related to a 12% complication rate and a 4% mortality rate for open aorto-bifemoral bypass (ABF).
1
Aorto-iliac stenting (AIS) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity, and shorter hospital stay compared to open bypass.
2
However, poorer long-term patency results were historically found with AIS for severe lesions.2–4 The Trans Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II guidelines for treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease recommend an endovascular approach for patients with focal or short lesions, namely TASC A or B.
5
Furthermore, for complex, multifocal, or totally occluded atherosclerotic segments of iliac arteries (TASC C or D lesions), surgery is the current recommendation
5
(Figure 1).
TASC Classification for aorto-iliac lesions.
5

Acceptable primary patency rates for endovascular intervention compared to open surgery even for severe aorto-iliac occlusive lesions have been reported. 6 This is postulated to have derived from technical and device improvements. Furthermore, secondary patency data suggest that an endovascular approach is an easy-to-repeat procedure for re-stenosis. The aim of this study was to report our experience of AIS for severe, TASC D lesions, using the Atrium Advanta V12 balloon-expandable covered stents (Atrium Australia-Pacific Rim Pty LTD, NSW).
Methods
Study design
We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent an endovascular procedure for aorto-iliac occlusive disease from March 2010 to September 2012. Cases were identified from both a database maintained at the Princess Alexandra Hospital and a smaller number of cases performed by the authors at the St Andrews Hospital in Queensland, Australia. All patients were either booked electively from an outpatient clinic or were admitted with critical limb ischaemia. Clinical, perioperative and demographic data were obtained through review of hospital records. Lesions were classified according to severity using the TASC II guidelines following consultant radiologist review of intra-procedural angiograms (Figure 1). All lesions classified TASC A, B or C on criteria were excluded from the study. 5 Clinical features of lower-limb ischaemia were classified and followed up using the Fontaine classification. 7 All cases utilised the Atrium Advanta V12© Balloon mounted PTFE covered stent system.
Stents and procedures
All patients were evaluated pre-procedure with Computed Tomography (CT) angiogram, Duplex ultrasound (DUS) or both. All procedures were performed in an interventional angiography suite or hybrid operating theatre. Procedures were preferentially performed percutaneously under local anaesthesia. General anaesthetic was utilised where a prolonged procedure or concomitant open approach was anticipated. Percutaneous endovascular access was obtained under ultrasound guidance either via bilateral retrograde common femoral artery punctures or a combined femoral/brachial approach under aseptic Seldinger technique. A 5Fr sheath was inserted and following guide wire access, a digital subtraction angiogram was performed via a pigtail catheter. Lesions were then crossed either endoluminally or subintimally with 5000 units of Heparin cover. Cases where lesions could not be crossed were not included in the case series. Preferentially, a Van Schie Beacon® Tip Seeking Catheter (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN, USA) was used to cross the lesion/s. This was followed by exchange to a 7Fr 45 cm long sheath. Stent length and diameter characteristics were determined based on measurements of the length of the lesion and the diameter of the adjacent normal vessel. The delivery system was positioned and balloon-expandable PTFE-covered stents were deployed. Stents were deployed simultaneously in the case of ‘kissing’ iliac stents. After deployment, stents were routinely dilated using a balloon catheter of the same size or 1 mm smaller. Post-stenting angiography was routinely performed to confirm stent and runoff patency. Technical success was defined as successful vascular access and completion of the endovascular procedure, as well as <30% residual diameter reduction on completion angiography. 8 Occasionally, self-expanding stents were used for residual disease of the external iliac arteries. Manual pressure or a closure device was used in cases of percutaneous access. Protamine was occasionally given at the discretion of the surgeon.
Medical therapy
All patients were placed on pre- and post-operative antiplatelet therapy. All cases were performed with broad-spectrum antibiotic cover given at induction of anaesthesia. Single antiplatelet therapy was continued indefinitely post-stenting. All patients were placed on an HMGCoA reductase inhibitor.
Study end points
Our primary endpoint was primary patency, which was defined as uninterrupted patency without further procedures performed on, or at the margins of the treated segment at the end of follow-up. Secondary endpoints were secondary patency, technical success, complications, limb salvage and survival. Secondary patency was defined as a patent-treated segment following further intervention to maintain patency. Restenosis was defined as a greater than 2.5 peak systolic velocity index on colour DUS or greater than 30% diameter reduction in a treated segment on angiography. 8 Follow-up of stent patency was based on clinical and radiological assessments. ABI measurements were not routinely recorded. Patients were routinely followed up with aorto-iliac DUS performed at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after intervention. Surveillance DUS studies were sought annually thereafter.
Statistical analysis
To measure the primary/secondary patency rates for the patient group, Kaplan–Meier estimators were used to estimate the survival function over time. For univariate comparisons of the pre-operative factors, log-rank tests were performed to evaluate whether differences in survival functions existed between groups. Both Kaplan–Meier and univariate analysis were performed with Graphpad Prism software (Version 5 for Mac, Graphpad software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant for P < 0.05.
Results
Demographic data
Baseline characteristics.
Pre-procedural imaging
Procedural details.
Procedure
Eighteen patients were treated via local anaesthetic to the puncture site, whilst 12 patients required general anaesthesia. There were three cases of an open approach to the common femoral artery, two of which involved concomitant common femoral endarterectomy. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the cases treated. Stent configuration comprised ‘kissing’ iliac stents in 20 patients, a large diameter aortic stent with iliac stenting in six patients, and an aortic stent alone (Figure 3) in four patients. Two procedural complications were reported amongst the cohort. There was one case of in-stent thrombosis that required thrombectomy with distal emboli to the internal iliac artery. This was attributed to a failure to give heparin prior to deployment of the stent. Localised rectal ischaemia was found on colonoscopy following the procedure, although this was managed conservatively. One significant groin hematoma was also reported and this too was managed conservatively. There were no vessel wall ruptures or dissections. No planned percutaneous cases required conversion to an open approach.
Follow-up
The average follow-up was 14.23 months (range 4-38 months) with a reported median of 13 months. The median Fontaine classification improved from three pre-stent placement to two post-stenting. An open distal revascularisation procedure was performed following AIS in four cases. As mentioned, two patients underwent concomitant common femoral endarterectomy. A single patient underwent a planned femoro-femoral crossover graft procedure after aortic and uni-iliac stenting. Another patient proceeded to femero-popliteal bypass graft. Both were performed as separate procedures. The median length of stay was two days. Four patients stayed in hospital for longer than seven days requiring multiple other surgical procedures. Eight patients were discharged on day 1 post-endovascular intervention.
Primary patency at 6, 12 and 24 months was 97%, 90% and 79%, respectively (Figure 4). There was no statistically significant difference in primary patency for patients stratified by Fontaine staging. Four of the iliac stents developed stenoses within the follow-up period whilst all the aortic stents remained patent on DUS. Four patients failed to attend for follow-up DUS and were lost to follow up after six-week clinic review. All these patients had a 1-point reduction in Fontaine classification post-stenting. Secondary patency was successfully achieved in three cases; one with repeat stenting and the other two with balloon angioplasty for in-stent stenosis. No complications were reported for re-interventions. Secondary patency could not be achieved in a single case as the patient elected for conservative management. Subsequently, secondary patency was 97% at the end of follow-up for a limb salvage rate of 100% (Figure 4).
A pre-procedural digital subtraction angiogram demonstarting a TASC D complete distal aortic occlusion. A post-procedural digital subtraction angiogram demonstrating successful treatment with a single covered Aortic stent. Kaplan–Meier survival curve estimates for primary and secondary patency in all patients treated for aorto-iliac occlusive disease.


One patient death was recorded within the follow-up period following discharge from hospital 4.5 months post-intervention. The patients’ last DUS at four months confirmed primary stent patency. The certified cause of death was congestive cardiac failure on a background of renal failure and ischaemic heart disease.
Discussion
The endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac occlusive disease has evolved significantly in recent years with improvements in imaging, endovascular devices and increased surgeon familiarity with the approach. Subsequently, many centres are seeing an increase in primary endovascular treatments for severe disease and a decline in aorto-bifemoral bypass.
An endovascular approach to aortoiliac disease is associated with lower morbidity and mortality. We reported a primary patency rate of 79% in the present study at the end of follow-up. The authors concede that our primary patency rate is not equivalent to that reported for ABF by Kashyap et al. of 93% at 36 months. 3 We did, however, report a secondary patency rate of 97% at the end of the follow-up period. Furthermore, we reported just one death amongst the cohort at the end of follow-up. In contrast, DeVries et al. in a meta-analysis of ABF found that an open approach was associated with an operative mortality of 3.3%. 1 Furthermore, they reported an aggregated systemic morbidity risk of 8.3%. 1 We reported a median length of stay of two days without any associated systemic morbidity. Comparison studies with ABF have reported significantly longer length of stay in open bypass groups owing to the extensive nature of the reconstruction and concomitant significant perioperative morbidity. 2 Over half of our procedures were performed under local anaesthesia.
Overall, four cases of significant in stent stenosis were reported, all in patients with iliac stents. We performed three re-interventions for in-stent stenosis, all achieving secondary patency. A single patient declined re-intervention. There were no failures of re-intervention at the end of follow up. In-stent stenoses were found to occur at the distal segment of the stent in all cases. Retrospective review of procedural angiograms revealed incomplete coverage of the target lesion. There were no significant differences in lesion characteristics identified where re-stenosis had occurred. It is postulated that this may result in progression of the atherosclerotic process particularly in the context of balloon inflation outside of the stented region. 7 Loss of patency emphasises the importance of landing the ends of the stent in an undiseased segment of the vessel and diligent follow-up of stented lesions.
Patency results in the literature vary considerably with regard to aorto-iliac disease compared to isolated aortic lesions. Iliac occlusions tend to be more complex and challenging to treat via endovascular means and were previously associated with high rates of embolic complications. 9 Covered stents were utilised in the present study based on recent reports that have suggested superior primary patency rates for covered stents compared to bare metal stents for TASC C and D lesions.7,10 It is postulated that covered stents may reduce re-stenosis caused by intimal hyperplasia. 7 In the present study, 20 cases of kissing stents and six cases of aorto-iliac stents were inserted for aorto-iliac occlusive lesions. Follow-up revealed four cases of re-stenosis, with three successful re-interventions for a secondary patency rate of 97%. This is in keeping with the results of the COBEST trial, which reported a secondary patency of 95% at 12 months for TASC C and D treated lesions. 7 We inserted kissing iliac stents in two cases and four aortic stents for isolated aortic occlusive lesions with no re-stenosis after an average follow-up of 16 months. This is in keeping with a case series performed by Bruijnen et al., who stented 12 patients with isolated infra-renal aortic disease reporting no cases of restenosis. 11 Our results affirm the conclusion that covered stents are related to an improved outcome in a kissing stent configuration and related to excellent results in isolated aortic lesions. 12
The authors acknowledge that the relatively small number of patients included in the present study accounts largely for the absence of statistically significant univariate predictors of patency. The duration of follow-up is short in the context of endovascular stent graft intervention, which is likely to bias primary patency data. This is likely to have add-on effects to secondary patency and affirms the need for long-term follow-up of these patients. Unfortunately, a cost analysis of primary therapy and re-intervention was outside the scope of this report.
Conclusion
Our case series demonstrates that treatment of complex aorto-iliac occlusive disease with covered balloon-expandable stents can have acceptable results with good patency and good clinical outcome. In cases of re-stenosis, secondary patency can often be achieved with repeat stenting with rates comparable to open surgical revascularisation, and carrying a much lower morbidity rate than an open procedure. Larger studies, with longer follow up periods, are required to confirm acceptable long-term patency rates compared with open surgical intervention in patients with radiologically severe disease. Furthermore, cost analysis of an endovascular approach, with its anticipated high re-intervention rate, would aid vascular surgeons in future treatment decisions.
Footnotes
Authors’ note
The paper was presented following abstract submission at the 2012 ANZSVS Conference in Melbourne.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
