ERCC1 expression and platinum chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to comprehensively investigate the correlation of ERCC1 expression and chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer.

Methods:

The literature on the relationship between the excision repair cross complementary gene 1 (ERCC1) and the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer published in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CNKI, and the China Wanfang database from the establishment of the databases to June 2020 were searched. Chemosensitivity is evaluated by clinical effective rate (complete remission plus partial remission). Statistical analysis was carried out by using Stata 15.1 software.

Results:

A total of 11 articles met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 758 patients with ovarian cancer. The results showed a significant difference in chemosensitivity between the low expression group and the high expression group of ERCC1 (odds ratio 4.23; 95% confidence interval 2.96, 6.06; P < 0. 01). The same result was shown in the ethnicity subgroup.

Conclusion:

The chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer patients with a low expression of ERCC1 is better than that of patients with a high expression.

Keywords

ERCC1 ovarian cancer chemosensitivity meta-analysis

Introduction

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common malignant gynecological tumors in women, with the third highest incidence behind cervical cancer and endometrial cancer.¹ At present, the main screening methods for ovarian cancer are color Doppler ultrasound, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and tumor markers, but the specificity and sensitivity of ovarian cancer are low.² Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the three most common malignant tumors in the female reproductive system. It has high mortality and poor prognosis, which seriously threatens the physical and mental health of women. The ovary is located in the deep part of the pelvis. Due to the lack of early diagnostic methods and inconspicuous clinical symptoms, most ovarian cancers are found in the late stage. According to some studies, approximately 70% of the patients are diagnosed in this stage.³ The 5-year survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer has hovered under 45%.⁴ The mortality of ovarian cancer ranks first in all kinds of gynecological tumors and poses a serious threat to the lives of women. The embryonic development, tissue anatomy, and endocrine function of the ovary are complex, and the early symptoms are not typical.

It is very difficult to distinguish the tissue type of ovarian tumor and whether it is benign or malignant before operating.⁵ With the advance of medical science and technology in recent years, the progress of chemotherapy combined with paclitaxel and platinum has greatly improved the therapeutic effect of ovarian cancer and the success rate of treatment to a certain extent. Nevertheless, there is no significant improvement in the 5-year survival rate. Currently, a small number of patients in the initial stage of treatment do not respond to platinum drugs, and some patients in whom the initial treatment is effective experience a recurrence. According to the literature, the 5-year survival rate of advanced ovarian cancer is 20%–30%, while that of early ovarian cancer is as high as 90%.⁶ Surgery combined with chemotherapy cannot cure advanced ovarian cancer; it can only play the role of temporary relief. Thus, 70%–80% of patients with such ovarian cancer still experience recurrence.⁷ The resistance of the tumor to platinum is the main obstacle. The development of tumor cells resistance to platinum is caused by multiple factors, which may include the decrease of drug accumulation, the increase of glutathione levels and metallothionein, and the improvement of DNA repair ability.⁷ Nucleotide excision repair cross complementary gene 1 (ERCC1) is a gene that can recognize DNA damage and cleave the DNA chain. Its overexpression can remove platinum DNA compounds. The damaged tumor DNA is repaired and replicated again.⁸ The ERCC1 gene is considered to repair damaged tumor cells’ platinum and DNA compounds, which are related to the ability of tumor tissue to restore replication and proliferation. Therefore, its expression may be used to predict the efficacy of platinum chemotherapy in patients with EOC to guide the clinical use of drugs.⁹

It has been reported that there is a correlation between the high expression of ERCC1 and cisplatin resistance, which also affects the survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer.^{10, 11} Current studies tend to suggest that people with a low expression of ERCC1 have a better response to cisplatin chemotherapy than those with high expression.¹² However, this conclusion is also controversial. Bösmüller et al.¹³ have found that the expression of ERCC1 is not related to platinum chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer. At present, the studies on chemotherapy and ERCC1 gene or protein expression in ovarian cancer are limited to small-scale and small-sample research, but lack of large-sample multicenter clinical studies. Therefore, this study conducted a meta-analysis of the relationship between the expression of ERCC1 gene protein and platinum chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer, and comprehensively evaluated the effect of ERCC1 expression on platinum chemosensitivity in those patients.

Material and methods

Literature retrieval

Through a computer search of PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Wanfang databases, the literature from their inceptions to June 2020 were selected, regarding the expression of ERCC1 and the chemosensitivity of platinum drugs in ovarian cancer. The search strategy was as follows: (“Ovarian cancer” OR “Ovarian carcinoma”) AND (“ERCC1” OR “excision repair cross-complementation group 1”) AND “Chemosensitivity”. There were no language restrictions.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the literature

Inclusion criteria: (a) Patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer by pathological or cytological examination; (b) immunohistochemistry, branch DNA-liquid phase core technique, or polymerase chain reaction were used to detect the expression of ERCC1 in ovarian cancer tissues; (c) patients with ovarian cancer were treated with platinum chemotherapy; and (d) the number of cases in which the expression of ERCC1 in ovarian cancer was sensitive to chemotherapy with high or low platinum drugs was provided.

Exclusion criteria: (a) Repeated reports of the same study; (b) animal experiments or ovarian cancer cell lines; (c) non-platinum regimen chemotherapy, or fewer than two courses of chemotherapy; and (d) Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) score less than 6.

Literature screening and data extraction

After two trained researchers read the titles and abstracts independently—excluding trials that obviously did not meet the inclusion criteria and met the exclusion criteria—they further read the full text of the other part of the trials to determine whether they really met the requirements, and cross-checked them. For trials where it was difficult to determine whether to include them, the divergence on choice was resolved through panel discussions. The two researchers independently completed the information extraction according to the pre-designed data extraction table. For repeatedly published articles, only the most recently published and most complete were selected.

Literature quality evaluation

According to the NOS,¹⁴ the quality of the literature was evaluated. Literature with fewer than 6 stars was low quality, while literature with 6 stars or more were high quality. Only the high-quality reports were included in this study.

Statistical methods

The meta-analysis was carried out by using Stata 15.1 software. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), as the effect size, were calculated to represent the results. A Q-test was used to test the heterogeneity of the results of each study. If I² ⩾ 50%, or P ⩽ 0.05, it was considered to be of heterogeneity and the random-effects model was used. If I² < 50%, and P > 0.05, there was no heterogeneity, so the fixed-effects model (FEM) could be used for data consolidation. The Z-test was used to test the significance of the combined OR value. This meta-analysis was included in the evaluation of publication bias, and the judged standard was whether the funnel plot was symmetrical or not. The funnel plot was to use the standard error of each study log (OR) to map its OR value. If the funnel plot was asymmetric, there may be publication bias. Egger’s Test was used to test the publication bias. Subgroup analysis was carried out according to the ethnicity of the population included in the study. The sensitivity of the results was analyzed to determine the robustness of the conclusion.

Results

Literature retrieval results

A comprehensive search of the literature in each database was undertaken and the results were cross-checked. After the obtained literature was read, it was screened in strict accordance with the requirements of inclusion and exclusion criteria, and quality control. The specific screening process is shown in Figure 1, and the basic characteristics of the literature are shown in Table 1. Eleven studies^{12, 13, 15-23} were included in the analysis. A total of 758 patients with ovarian cancer were positive, with the positive expression rate of 55.1%. In the included studies, the cut-off value of ERCC1 expression, the source of the primary antibody, the dilution ratio, and the detection method of chemosensitivity are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Figure 1.

A flow diagram of the study selection process.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the inclusion studies.

First author	Year	Ethnicity	Detection method	Stage	Therapy regimen	ERCC1 negative		ERCC1 positive		NOS score
First author	Year	Ethnicity	Detection method	Stage	Therapy regimen	Response	No response	Response	No response	NOS score
Liu¹⁸	2008	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Cisplatin-based	28	8	11	11	8
Steffensen¹⁵	2009	Caucasian	IHC	I–IV	Carboplatin-based	67	6	11	3	8
Tang¹⁹	2009	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Cisplatin-based	18	7	8	23	7
Xie²⁰	2011	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Platinum-based	27	9	9	19	7
Bösmüller¹³	2011	Caucasian	IHC	III–IV	Carboplatin-based	6	0	21	14	8
Du²¹	2014	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Carboplatin-based	18	4	14	12	7
Muallem¹⁶	2014	German	IHC	I–IV	Platinum-based	19	12	49	67	8
Li²²	2016	Chinese	BDLPCT	I–IV	Platinum-based	12	4	10	22	7
Du¹²	2016	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Platinum-based	24	4	37	27	8
Ju¹⁷	2016	Chinese	IHC	I–IV	Platinum-based	22	11	4	2	8
Wang²³	2017	Chinese	RT-PCR	II–III	Platinum-based	25	9	11	33	6

BDLPCT: branch DNA-liquid phase core technique; ERCC1: excision repair cross complementary gene 1; IHC: immunohistochemistry; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; RT-PCR: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Relationship between ERCC1 expression and chemotherapy sensitivity of platinum drugs in ovarian cancer

The meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical heterogeneity among the 11 studies (P =0.534; I² =0. 0%). The FEM was used to analyze and then the forest plot was able to be drawn (see Figure 2). The complete remission rate plus the partial remission rate of ovarian cancer patients reported in the 11 studies (758 cases) displayed that the patients with a low expression of ERCC1 were more sensitive to chemotherapy than those with a high expression. The pooled OR value was 4.23 (95% CI 2.96, 6.06; P<0.01). The results of an ethnicity subgroup analysis showed that the expression of ERCC1 was associated with the chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer in the Chinese population, with an OR 5.05 (95% CI 3.31, 7.72; P < 0.01), and the expression of ERCC1 was associated with chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer in the Caucasian population, with an OR 2.63 (95% CI 3.31, 5.24, P<0.01). The differences were statistically significant. When the subgroup used the immunohistochemical method was analyzed, the expression of ERCC1 was related to chemosensitivity of platinum drugs in ovarian cancer (OR 3.61; 95% CI 2.40, 5.44). The results showed that there was a correlation between the expression of ERCC1 and platinum sensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer. The chemotherapy sensitivity of patients with a low expression of ERCC1 was higher than that of patients with a high expression of platinum.

Figure 2.

Forest plot for the association between ERCC1 expression and platinum chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer. ERCC1: excision repair cross complementary gene 1.

Publication bias analysis

The funnel plot was used to analyze the selected literature, and the symmetry of it was analyzed by Egger’s Z-test. The specific results are shown in Figure 3. The results demonstrated that the funnel plot was basically symmetrical, and by Egger’s Z-test the P-value was more than 0.05, indicating that there was no publication bias.

Figure 3.

Funnel plot for the assessment of publication bias.

Sensitivity analysis

The results of the sensitivity analysis are shown in Figure 4. After excluding each study one by one and by using a meta-analysis, the results demonstrated that there was no significant change in the combined effect. This showed that the conclusions drawn from the 11 included articles were robust.

Figure 4.

Sensitivity analysis results.

Discussion

In this study, a meta-analysis was used to study the relationship between the expression of ERCC1 and the chemosensitivity of platinum drugs in patients with ovarian cancer. The results showed that compared with ovarian cancer patients with a high expression of ERCC1, ovarian cancer patients with a low expression of ERCC1 were more sensitive to chemotherapy. Platinum preparation is the first-line chemotherapy drug for the treatment of ovarian cancer. It inhibits tumor cell division by inhibiting DNA replication.²⁴ The ERCC1 gene is the DNA damage repair gene. Its significance is to repair the genome dysfunction caused by carcinogenic factors and it has the effect of fighting the tumor. However, it has been reported that the ERCC1 gene is involved in the repair of DNA damage caused by platinum drugs and reduces the efficacy of chemotherapy. The expression level of the ERCC1 gene in tumors is closely related to the chemotherapeutic effect of platinum drugs on patients.²⁵ ERCC1 has endonuclease activity, which is the core factor of the nucleotide excision repair pathway and plays an important role in the repair process. It is indispensable in participating in the repair process in vivo, with two functions of excision of 5 ‘end and damage identification. On the one hand, ERCC1—as an endonuclease at the protein level—can repair the DNA damage caused by platinum drugs. On the other hand, the mechanism of drug resistance caused by the high expression of ERCC1 to tumor cells leads to the damage of DNA. Both of these aspects can cause platinum resistance. Platinum enters tumor cells and hydrolyzes into dichlorodiaminoplatinum, which binds to intracellular nucleophilic DNA to form platinum-DNA adducts, resulting in the inter-chain or intra-chain crosslinking of DNA, affecting the replication and transcription of DNA. It causes DNA damage and apoptosis of tumor cells.

ERCC1 can recognize and repair the injury caused by platinum. It can effectively remove the damaged nucleotides in time, so the tumor cells themselves can avoid the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs and produce drug resistance,²⁶ thus affecting the chemosensitivity of platinum drugs. The expression of ERCC1 is also related to the occurrence and prognosis of ovarian cancer. The expression of ERCC1 in 64 cases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma was studied.²⁷ It was found that the positive expression rate of ERCC1 in the chemotherapy-resistant group was significantly higher than that in the chemotherapy-sensitive group. Also, the expression of ERCC1 was not related to clinical characteristics. In the study of 60 cases of ovarian tumors,¹⁷ it was found that the positive expression of ERCC1 in borderline ovarian tumors was significantly higher than that in benign ovarian tumors and ovarian cancer. The expression of ERCC1 was not correlated with age, pathological type, tumor differentiation, and FIGO stage.

This meta-analysis included 11 articles consisting of 758 patients with ovarian cancer. The overall positive rate of ERCC1 was 55.1%. The results showed that the overexpression of ERCC1 correlated with the chemosensitivity of platinum drugs in ovarian cancer. Compared with the high expression of ERCC1, the low expression was more sensitive to platinum chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Subgroup analysis on the Chinese and Caucasian populations had the same results. From the point of view of statistical heterogeneity, the difference had no statistical significance, indicating that the homogeneity of samples in the study was good. From the perspective of publication bias, the funnel plot was basically symmetrical. Egger’s Z-test revealed that the P value was greater than 0.05, so it was considered that there was no publication bias. The results of the sensitivity analysis showed that excluding each study one by one and using a meta-analysis, the combined effect did not change significantly, indicating that the stability of the included study was good. Thus, it showed that the conclusion of this study was most reliable.

The results of Li et al.²⁸ demonstrated that the low expression of ERCC1 was more sensitive to platinum chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. This is consistent with the conclusion of this study. However, this study included more high-quality literature and an increased sample size, and made the conclusion more convincing. Numerous multivariate analyses have confirmed that the expression of ERCC1 is an important predictor of chemotherapy prognosis of ovarian cancer.^12,15 The conclusion of this study explains the reason to some extent.

Of course, this study also had some limitations: (a) The methods used in the included literature were basically immunohistochemical, which was used to detect the expression of ERCC1. There are some subjectivities and inconsistencies in the positive judgment of different researchers. (b) The number of the included literature was relatively small, most of which were from Asian countries, with only three from the Caucasian population. The population from African countries was zero. (c) It is unclear whether patients with ovarian cancer who are sensitive to platinum drugs are eligible to be retreated with platinum drugs. (d) Although all the included studies were reported to detect the expression of ERCC1 by immunohistochemistry, the manufacturer, dilution concentration, and judgment criteria of the antibody were not exactly the same, which may also affect the results of this meta-analysis.

Conclusion

There is a correlation between ERCC1 overexpression and platinum chemosensitivity of ovarian cancer. A low expression of ERCC1 is more sensitive to the platinum chemotherapy of ovarian cancer than a high expression, which is true in both Asian and Caucasian populations. The ERCC1 state may be a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of platinum chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. However, in view of the limitations of this study, large-scale and well-designed studies are still needed to investigate the factors that may affect patient response to platinum chemotherapy.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary_Table_1_1 – Supplemental material for ERCC1 expression and platinum chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis

Supplemental material, Supplementary_Table_1_1 for ERCC1 expression and platinum chemosensitivity in patients with ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis by Chunjie Zhang, Shan Gao and Jingwen Hou in The International Journal of Biological Markers

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no.31920190195) and Key Technology R&D Program of Gansu Province (grant no.144FKCA089).

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the study design; all authors collected the data and performed the data analysis; all authors prepared the manuscript.

Abbreviations

EOC: Epithelial ovarian cancer ; ERCC1: excision Repair Cross Complementary gene 1 ;IHC: immunohistochemical ; PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa scale; REM: random-effects model ; FEM: fixed-effects model ; NER: nucleotide excision repair

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not needed because this is a meta-analysis.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Our paper was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant no.31920190195) and Key Technology recurrent Program of Gansu Province (grant no.144FKCA089).

ORCID iD

Shan Gao

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Bray

Ferlay

Soerjomataram

, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424.

Paliwal

Vashist

Chauhan

Evaluation of miR-22 and miR-21 as diagnostic biomarkers in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. 3 Biotech 2020; 10: 142.

Wanqing

Cancer statistics: updated cancer burden in China. Chinese J Cancer Res 2015; 27: 1.

Webb

Jordan

SJ.

Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer. Best Pract Res Cl Ob 2016; 41.

Yoshida

Derchain

SFO

Pitta

, et al. Comparing the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA): Two equivalent ways to differentiate malignant from benign ovarian tumors before surgery? Gynecol Oncol 2016; 140: 481–485.

Siegel

Naishadham

Jemal

Cancer Statistics, 2012. Ca-Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10–29.

Reed

Platinum-DNA adduct, nucleotide excision repair and platinum based anti-cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 1998; 24: 331–344.

Luc

Ken André

Jean-Pierre

, et al. ERCC1 isoform expression and DNA repair in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 1101–1110.

Qiuhua

Haihong

Yongping

, et al. Prognostic value of ERCC1 mRNA expression in non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and gastric cancer in patients from Southern China. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2014; 7: 8312–8321.

10.

Dong

, et al. The relationship of platinum resistance and ERCC1 protein expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 820–825.

11.

Milovic-Kovacevic

Srdic-Rajic

Radulovic

, et al. Expression of ERCC1 protein in biopsy specimen predicts survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J BUON 2011; 16: 708–714.

12.

Wang

Chen

, et al. High ERCC1 expression is associated with platinum resistance, but not survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncol Lett 2016; 12: 857–862.

13.

Bösmüller

Haitchi-Petnehazy

Webersinke

, et al. Intratumoral lymphocyte density in serous ovarian carcinoma is superior to ERCC1 expression for predicting response to platinum-based therapy. Virchows Arch 2011; 459: 183–191.

14.

Andreas

Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603–605.

15.

Steffensen

Waldstrøm

Jakobsen

The relationship of platinum resistance and ERCC1 protein expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 820–825.

16.

Muallem

Braicu

Nassir

, et al. ERCC1 expression as a predictor of resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy in primary ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 2014; 34: 393–399.

17.

Zhao

, et al. Expression and clinical implication of Beclin1, HMGB1, p62, survivin, BRCA1 and ERCC1 in epithelial ovarian tumor tissues. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20: 1993.

18.

Liu

, et al. Relationship between nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 and resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 2008; 30: 184–187.

19.

Tang

Liang

YJ.

Relationship between the expression of ERCC1 in epithelial ovarian cancer and cisplatin resistance. Med J Qilu 2009; 24: 388–390.

20.

Xie

Yin

, et al. The protein expression of ERCC1 and survivin in epithelial ovarian carcinoma and their clinical significance. J Sichuan Univ (Med Sci Edi) 2011; 42: 86–89.

21.

Wang

Zhang

, et al. Association of ERCC1 and BRCA1 expression with clinical and pathological features and sensitivity to platinum-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma. Herald Med 2014; 33: 747–751.

22.

Liu

Zheng

, et al. Expression and significance of ERCC1 and TUBB3 in ovarian carcinoma. Chinese J Clin Med 2016; 23: 576–580.

23.

Wang

MX.

Relationship between platinum resistance and ERCC1-mRNA expression in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Shenyang Phar Univ 2017; 34: 254–260.

24.

Hildebrandt

MAT

Jian

Xifeng

Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC. Expert Opin Drug Met 2009; 5: 745.

25.

Eddie

ERCC1 and clinical resistance to platinum-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 6100–6102.

26.

Mehmet

Berna Bozkurt

Berksoy

, et al. ERCC1 and RRM1 as a predictive parameter for non-small cell lung, ovarian or pancreas cancer treated with cisplatin and/or gemcitabine. Wspolczesna Onkol 2015; 19: 207–213.

27.

Rubatt

Darcy

Chunqiao

, et al. Pre-treatment tumor expression of ERCC1 in women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer is not predictive of clinical outcomes: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 125: 421–426.

28.

F-Y

Ren

X-B

Xie

X-Y

, et al. Meta-analysis of excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) association with response to platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14: 7203–7206.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB