Several types of carbon nanotubes in their perfect and imperfect form were simulated, and their vibrational behavior was studied by performing computational examinations with fixed-free boundary conditions. Both computational and analytical results were compared in the case of perfect tubes. Afterward, three kinds of imperfections, that is, twisting angle, z-distortion along the longitudinal axis and xy-distortion along the radial axis, were introduced to the structure of perfect carbon nanotubes, and the natural frequencies of imperfect carbon nanotubes were numerically evaluated and compared with the behavior of the perfect ones. It was concluded that the existence of any type of imperfection in the structure of carbon nanotubes leads to a lower natural frequency and, as a result, lower vibrational stability. However, this trend was more visible for the carbon nanotubes with higher chirality.
ChuKGuoHJiaC. Thermal properties of carbon nanotube–copper composites for thermal management applications. Nanoscale Res Lett2010; 5: 868–874.
6.
SantiagoPAscencioJAMendozaD. Synthesis and structural determination of twisted MoS2 nanotubes. Appl Phys A: Mater2004; 78: 513–518.
7.
SugimotoYShioyaMMatsumotoH. Structure changes during tensile deformation and mechanical properties of a twisted carbon nanotube yarn. Carbon2013; 60: 193–201.
8.
RahmandoustMÖchsnerA. Influence of structural imperfections and doping on the mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Nano Res2009; 6: 185–196.
9.
HashemniaKFaridMVatankhahR. Vibrational analysis of carbon nanotubes and graphene sheets using molecular structural mechanics approach. Comp Mater Sci2009; 47: 79–85.
10.
ArghavanSSinghAV. On the vibrations of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Sound Vib2011; 330: 3102–3122.
11.
GhavamianAÖchsnerA. Numerical modeling of eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes under the influence of atomic defects. Comp Mater Sci2013; 72: 42–48.
12.
GhavamianAÖchsnerA. Numerical modeling of the eigenmodes and eigenfrequencies of carbon nanotubes under the influence of defects. J Nano Res2013; 21: 159–164.
13.
GhavamianARahmandoustMÖchsnerA. A numerical evaluation of the influence of defects on the elastic modulus of single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Comp Mater Sci2012; 62: 110–116.
14.
XinHHanQYaoX-H. Buckling and axially compressive properties of perfect and defective single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon2007; 45: 2486–2495.
15.
SongH-YSunH-MZhangG-X. Molecular dynamics study of effects of Si-doping upon structure and mechanical properties of carbon nanotube. Commun Theor Phys2006; 45: 741–744.
16.
GhavamianAÖchsnerA. Numerical investigation on the influence of defects on the buckling behavior of single- and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Physica E2012; 46: 241–249.
17.
TalukdarKMitraAK. Influence of odd and even number of Stone–Wales defects on the fracture behaviour of an armchair single-walled carbon nanotube under axial and torsional strain. Mol Simulat2010; 36: 409–417.
18.
KianiK. Longitudinal, transverse, and torsional vibrations and stabilities of axially moving single-walled carbon nanotubes. Curr Appl Phys2013; 13: 1651–1660.
19.
KianiK. Longitudinal and transverse instabilities of moving nanoscale beam-like structures made of functionally graded materials. Compos Struct2014; 107: 610–619.
20.
KianiK. Vibration and instability of a single-walled carbon nanotube in a three-dimensional magnetic field. J Phys Chem Solids2014; 75: 15–22.
21.
FariaBSilvestreNCanongia LopesJN. Induced anisotropy of chiral carbon nanotubes under combined tension-twisting. Mech Mater2013; 58: 97–109.
HarikV. New trends in nanoscale mechanics of carbon nanotubes. In HarikV (ed.) Trends in nanoscale mechanics. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014, pp.3–18.
24.
CaoLYangLLiuH. Investigation of graphite/carbon spiral nanoribbons using FeCl3-CuCl2-graphite intercalation compounds as precursors. Mater Lett2013; 108: 196–199.
25.
DresselhausMSDresselhausGSaitoR. Physics of carbon nanotubes. Carbon1995; 33: 883–891.
26.
LiCChouTW. A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 2487–2499.
27.
ÖchsnerAMerkelM. One-dimensional finite elements: an introduction to the FE method. Berlin: Springer, 2013.
28.
MelchorSMartin-MartinezFJDobadoJA. CoNTub v2.0—algorithms for constructing C3-symmetric models of three-nanotube junctions. J Chem Inf Model2011; 51: 1492–1505.
29.
SavinskiiSSKhokhriakovNV. Characteristic features of the pi-electron states of carbon nanotubes. J Exp Theor Phy1997; 84: 1131–1137.
30.
KangZLiMTangQ. Buckling behavior of carbon nanotube-based intramolecular junctions under compression: molecular dynamics simulation and finite element analysis. Comp Mater Sci2010; 50: 253–259.
31.
IrvineT. Application of the Newton-Raphson method to vibration problems. Madison, WI: Vibration data Publications, 1999.
32.
ToCWS. Bending and shear moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Finite Elem Anal Des2006; 42: 404–413.
33.
KalamkarovALGeorgiadesAVRokkamSK. Analytical and numerical techniques to predict carbon nanotubes properties. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 6832–6854.
34.
LuJP. Elastic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanoropes. Phys Rev Lett1997; 79: 1297–1300.
35.
KangJWChoiYGKimY. The frequency of cantilevered double-wall carbon nanotube resonators as a function of outer wall length. J Phys Condens Matter2009; 21: 385301–385306.
36.
LiCChouT-W. Single-walled carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh frequency nanomechanical resonators. Phys Rev B2003; 68: 073405–073407.
