Challenges in designing a pragmatic clinical trial: the mixed incontinence — medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial experience

Abstract

Background Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is a common, bothersome condition in women. In MUI, the two subtypes of urinary incontinence that coexist are treated differently; stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is primarily treated surgically while urge urinary incontinence (UUI) is primarily treated medically. There is no evidence to guide the treatment for women with significant bother from both incontinence subtypes. Therefore, investigators of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN) designed and initiated a randomized clinical trial comparing outcomes for two distinct initial treatment approaches for women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI): therapy initiated with surgery versus therapy initiated with nonsurgical treatment.

Purpose The aim of this manuscript is to describe the challenges in planning and implementing this randomized clinical trial.

Methods The mixed incontinence: medical or surgical approach (MIMOSA) trial was designed as a practical or pragmatic clinical trial to establish the relative efficacy of two specific treatment approaches. The design presented many challenging decisions including: (1) selection of practical paradigm; (2) refining inclusion/ exclusion criteria to offer equipoise; (3) selection of feasibility sample size; (4) recruitment challenges for two divergent treatment approaches (medical vs. surgical), and (5) resolution of ethical and methodological issues.

Results MIMOSA recruitment was planned in two phases, starting with a 5-month pilot and feasibility phase followed by a full trial contingent on the outcome of the first phase. The feasibility portion of the MIMOSA trial started in November 2008. 1198 subjects were screened and approached forstudy enrollment, but only 27 consented to randomization. The feasibility study was halted due to lack of enrollment in March 2009.

Limitations The challenges of this trial included a lack of information from subjects who did not enroll, increasing the difficulty of interpreting the feasibility phase.

Conclusions Successful recruitment to a randomized trial that compares significantly different treatment approaches poses a challenge. Clinical Trials 2009; 6: 355—364. http://ctj.sagepub.com

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Nygaard I. , Barber MD , Burgio KL et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. JAMA 2008; 300: 1311-16.

Diokno AC , Brock BM , Brown MB et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and other urological symptoms in the noninstitutionalized elderly. J Urol 1986; 136: 1022-25.

Hampel C. , Wienhold D. , Benken N. et al. Definition of overactive bladder and epidemiology of urinary incontinence . Urology 1997; 50: 4-14.

Hannestad YS , Rortveit G. , Sandvik H. et al. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trondelag. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1150-57.

Sandvik H. , Hunskaar S. , Vanvik A. et al. Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: an epidemiological survey corrected for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 339-43.

Lukacz ES , Lawrence JM , Buckwalter JG et al. Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey. Int Urogynecol J 2005; 16: 272-84.

Jeffry L. , Deval B. , Birsan A. et al. Objective and subjective cure rates after tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology 2001; 58(5): 702-06.

Meschia M. , Pifarotti P. , Spennacchio M. et al. A randomized comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and endopelvic fascia plication in women with genital prolapse and occult stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(3): 609-13.

Albo ME , Richter H. , Brubaker L. et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. [see comment]. N Engl J Med 2007; 356(21): 2143-55.

10.

Osman T. Stress incontinence surgery for patients presenting with mixed incontinence and a normal cystometrogram. BJU Int 2003; 92(9): 964-68.

11.

Barber MD , Walters MD , Bump RC Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193(1): 103-13.

12.

Carr LK , Webster GD Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 1997; 157(3): 821-23.

13.

Hay-Smith J. , Herbison P. , Ellis G. et al. Which anticholinergic drug for overactive bladder symptoms in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005; (issue 3) Art. No: 005429.

14.

Dumoulin C. , HaySmith J. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009; (issue 1) Art. No: 005654.

15.

Burgio KL , Kraus SR , Menefee S. et al. Behavioral therapy to enable women with urge incontinence to discontinue drug treatment: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149(3): 161-69.

16.

Williams KS , Assassa RP , Gillies CL et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of pelvic floor therapies for urodynamic stress and mixed incontinence . BJU Int 2006; 98(5): 1043-50.

17.

Mahajan S. , Fitzgerald MP , Kenton K. et al. The second continence procedure: Do results depend on what was done first? J Pelvic Med Surg 2005; 12(2): 111.

18.

Mahajan ST , Elkadry EA , Kenton KS et al. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194(3): 722-28.

19.

Elkadry EA , Kenton KS , FitzGerald MP et al. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(6): 1551-57; discussion 1557-58.

20.

MacPherson H. Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther Med 2004; 12(2-3): 136-40.

21.

Schwartz D. , Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials. J Chronic Dis 1967; 20: 637-48.

22.

Tunis SR , Stryer DB , Clancy CM Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA 2003; 290(12): 1624-32.

23.

Yalcin I. , Bump RC Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189(1): 98-101.

24.

Shumaker SA , Wyman JF , Uebersax JS et al. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: The incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 291-306.

25.

Uebersax JS , Wyman JF , Shumaker SA et al. Short forms to assess life quality and symptom distress for urinary incontinence in women: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program for Women Research Group. Neurourol Urodyn 1995 ; 14(2): 131-39.

26.

Ware JE , Kosinski M. , Keller SD A 12-item Short-form Health Survey. Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-33.

27.

Rogers RG , Kammerer-Doak D. , Villarreal A. et al. A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184(4): 552-58.

28.

Dindo D. , Demartines N. , Claiven PA Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evlaution in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240(2): 205-13.

29.

Rolnick SJ , Flores SK , Fowler SE et al. Conducting randomized, controlled trials. Experience with the dysfunctional uterine bleeding intervention trial. J Reprod Med 2001; 46(1): 1-5.

30.

Wilt TJ BM The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). Oncology (Williston Park) 1997; 11(8): 1133-39; discussion 1139-40.

31.

Kirkley A. , Birmingham TB , Litchfield RB et al. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. [see comment]. N Engl J Med 2008 ; 359(11): 1097-107.