Trial Steering Committees in randomised controlled trials: A survey of registered clinical trials units to establish current practice and experiences

Abstract

Background:

The Medical Research Council Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice outlines a three-committee trial oversight structure – the day-to-day Trial Management Group, the Data Monitoring Committee and the Trial Steering Committee. In this model, the Trial Steering Committee is the executive committee that oversees the trial and considers the recommendations from the Data Monitoring Committee. There is yet to be in-depth consideration establishing the Trial Steering Committee’s role and functionality.

Methods:

A survey to establish Trial Steering Committee’s current practices, role and the use and opinion on the Medical Research Council guidelines was undertaken within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units.

Results:

Completed surveys were obtained from 38 of 47 fully and partially registered Units. Individual items in the survey were analysed and reported spanning current Trial Steering Committee practices including its role, requirement and experience required for membership; methods to identify members; and meeting frequency. Terms (a document describing the committee’s remit, objectives and functionality) were obtained and analysed from 21 of 33 Units with documents in place at their Unit. A total of 20 responders suggested aspects of the current Medical Research Council Guidelines that need improvement.

Conclusion:

We present the first survey reporting on practices within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units on the experience and remits of Trial Steering Committees. We have identified a widespread adoption of Medical Research Council Guidelines for Trial Steering Committees in the United Kingdom, but limitations in this existing provision have been identified that need to be addressed.

Keywords

Trials oversight committee clinical trials unit trial steering committee clinical trial randomised controlled trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grant

Altman

Babiker

. Issues in data monitoring and interim analysis of trials. Health Technol Assess 2005; 9(7): 1–238, iii–iv.

DAMOCLES Study Group. A proposed charter for clinical trial data monitoring committees: helping them to do their job well. Lancet 2005; 365: 711–722.

Chan

Tetzlaff

Gøtzsche

. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013; 346: e7586.

Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice in Clinical Trials, http://www.mrc.ac.uk (1998, accessed 10 November 2014).

National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme: Study Steering Committee or Trial Steering Committee, 2012.

Wellcome Trust policy position on clinical trials, http://www.wellcome.ac.uk (2013, accessed 10 November 2014).

International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guidelines: guideline for good clinical practice, E6(R1), 1996, http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6/E6_R1_Guideline.pdf (accessed 27 February 2015).

UKCRC Registered Clinical Trials Units Network, http://www.ukcrc-ctu.org.uk/ (accessed 9 May 2013).

National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme. Research governance guidelines, http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk (accessed 10 November 2014).

10.

National Institute of Health. Toolkit for clinical researchers. Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) guidelines, http://www.nih.gov (accessed 10 November 2014).

11.

Buck

Gamble

Dudley

. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e006400.

12.

McFadden

Bashir

Canham

. The impact of registration of clinical trials units: the UK experience. Clin Trials 2015; 12: 166–173.

13.

Gamble

Dudley

Allam

. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trials development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e005234.

14.

Daykin

Heawood

Lane

. An ethnographic study of group decision making to understand and improve how trial steering committees contribute to trial conduct. In: 2nd clinical trials methodology conference: methodology matters, Edinburgh, 18–19 November 2013.