Effect of two different participant information sheets on recruitment to a falls trial: An embedded randomised recruitment trial

Abstract

Background/Aims

Recruitment to trials of intervention for older people who fall is challenging. Evidence suggests that the word falls has negative connotations for older people, and this may present a barrier to engaging with trials in this area. We therefore tested whether a participant information sheet that minimised reference to falls could improve recruitment rates.

Methods

We conducted a study within a trial, embedded within a randomised controlled trial of vitamin K versus placebo to improve postural sway in patients aged 65 and over with a history of falls. Potential participants were identified from primary care lists in 14 practices and were randomised to receive either a standard participant information sheet or an information sheet minimising use of the word falls, instead focussing on maintenance of health, fitness and balance. The primary outcome for this embedded trial was the proportion of responses expressing interest in participating received in each arm. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of those contacted attending a screening visit, consenting at screening, and the proportion contacted who were randomised into the main trial.

Results

In all, 4145 invitations were sent, with an overall response rate of 444 (10.7%). In all, 2148 individuals received the new information sheet (minimising reference to falls); 1997 received the standard information sheet. There was no statistically significant difference in response rate between those individuals sent the new information sheet and those sent the standard information sheet (10.1% vs 11.4%; difference 1.3% (95% confidence interval −0.6% to 3.2%); p = 0.19). Similarly, we found no statistically significant difference between the percentage of those who attended and consented at screening in the two groups (2.1% vs 2.7%; difference 0.6% (95% confidence interval: –0.4% to 1.6%); p = 0.20), and no statistically significant difference between the percentage randomised in the two groups (2.0% vs 2.6%; difference 0.6% (95% confidence interval −0.4% to 1.6%); p = 0.20)

Conclusions

Use of a participant information sheet minimising reference to falls did not lead to a greater response rate in this trial targeting older people with a history of falls.

Keywords

Falls study within a trial participant information sheet recruitment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Sully

BGO

Julious

Nicholl

. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials 2013; 14: 166.

McMurdo

Roberts

Parker

et al . Improving recruitment of older people to research through good practice. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 659–665.

Treweek

Lockhart

Pitkethly

et al . Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002360.

Treweek

Altman

Bower

et al . Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the trial forge platform. Trials 2015; 16: 261.

Rick

Graffy

Knapp

et al . Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials. Trials 2014; 15: 407.

MRC Trials Methodology Hub, http://www.methodologyhubs.mrc.ac.uk/research/working-groups/recruitment/ (accessed 16 July 2018).

Age UK, Don’t mention the F-Word: advice to practitioners on communicating messages to older people, https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publications/reports-and-briefings/health–wellbeing/rb_2012_falls_prevention_dont_mention_the_f_word.pdf (2012, accessed 16 July 2018).

Yardley

Donovan-Hall

Francis

et al . Older people’s views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study. Health Educ Res 2006; 21: 508–517.

Yardley

Bishop

Beyer

et al . Older people’s views of falls-prevention interventions in six European countries. Gerontologist 2006; 46: 650–660.

10.

Yardley

Beyer

Hauer

et al . Recommendations for promoting the engagement of older people in activities to prevent falls. Qual Saf Health Care 2007; 16: 230–234.

11.

http://www.qub.ac.uk/sites/TheNorthernIrelandNetworkforTrialsMethodologyResearch/SWATSWARInformation/Repositories/SWATStore/ (accessed 16 July 2018).

12.

Treweek

Bevan

Bower

et al . Trial forge guidance 1: what is a study within a trial (SWAT)? Trials 2018; 19: 139.

13.

Witham

Price

Struthers

et al . Cholecalciferol treatment to reduce blood pressure in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension: the VitDISH randomized controlled trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013; 173: 1672–1679.

14.

Fulton

McMurdo

Hill

et al . Effect of vitamin K on vascular health and physical function in older people with vascular disease: a randomised controlled trial. J Nutr Health Aging 2016; 20: 325–333.

15.

Pighills

Torgerson

Sheldon

Publicity does not increase recruitment to falls prevention trials: the results of two quasi-randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1332–1335.

16.

Cockayne

Fairhurst

Adamson

et al . An optimised patient information sheet did not significantly increase recruitment or retention in a falls prevention study: an embedded randomised recruitment trial. Trials 2017; 18: 144.

17.

Michie

Prestwich

Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol 2010; 29: 1–8.

18.

Duncan

Bonetti

Clarkson

et al . Improving trial questionnaire response rates using behaviour change theory. Trials 2015; 16(Suppl. 2): 92.