Government policy in England has encouraged schools to adopt a rational planning
model on the basis that this will contribute to school effectiveness. This policy
has been criticized for neglecting the consequences for the planning process of
volatility in schools’ external environment and for replacing
well-developed professional knowledge and commitment with inappropriate models from
‘for-profit’ business. We agree that the rational planning model
is not an appropriate basis for school management but dispute these diagnoses of the
nature of the problem. We suggest that it is uncertainty about processes internal to
the school that are the problem and that an appropriate managerial response to this
problem can draw upon business ideas which are not oppositional to professional
expertise and values, while questioning professional self-interest.
Adnett, N.
(2003)
‘Reforming Teachers’ Pay: Incentive Payments,
Collegiate Ethos and UK Policy’
, Cambridge Journal of Economics27:
145-157
.
2.
Adnett, N.
and
Davies, P.
(2002) Markets for Schooling: An Economic Analysis.
London: Routledge
.
3.
Adnett, N.
and
Davies, P.
(2003)
‘From quasi-markets to co-opetition’
, Journal of Educational Policy18(3):
415-428
.
4.
Adnett, N.
and
Davies, P.
(forthcoming)
‘Competition within Schools: A Case for Re-targeting Policy?’
, Education Economics13(1).
5.
Audit Commission
(2002) Recruitment and Retention: A Public Service Workforce
for the 21st Century.
London: Audit Commission
.
6.
Ball, S.
,
Bowe, R.
and
Gewirtz, S.
(1996)
‘School Choice, Social Class and Distinction’
, Journal of Education Policy11(1):
89-112
.
7.
Bell, L.
(1998)
‘From Symphony to Jazz: The Concept of Strategy in Education’
, School Leadership and Management18(4):
449-460
.
8.
Bowe, R.
,
Ball, S.
and
Gewirtz, S.
(1994)
‘“Parental Choice”, Consumption and Social
Theory: The Operation of Micro-Markets in Education’
, British Journal of Educational Studies42(1):
38-52
.
9.
Bradley, S.
and
Taylor J.
(2002)
‘The Effect of the Quasi-Market on the Efficiency-Equity
Trade-off in the Secondary Schools Sector’
, Bulletin of Economic Research54(3):
295-314
.
10.
Bullock, A.
and
Thomas, H.
(1997) Schools at the Centre? A Study of
Decentralisation.
London: Routledge
.
11.
Bureau Van Dijk
(2000) Fame Database of Company Details.
BVD Electronic Publishing
, http://suite.bvdep.com/directory/index.htm.
12.
Carnoy, M.
and
Loeb, S.
(2002)
‘Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A
Cross-State Analysis’
, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis24(4):
305-332
.
13.
Chubb, J.
and
Moe, T.
(1988)
‘Politics, Markets and the Organization of Schools’
, American Political Science Review82(4):
1065-1087
.
14.
Coe, R.
and
Fitz-Gibbon, C.T.
(1998)
‘School Effectiveness Research: Criticisms and Recommendations’
, Oxford Review of Education24(4):
421-438
.
15.
Cohen, D.
,
Raudenbusch, S.
and
Ball, D.
(2003)
‘Resources, Instruction and Research’
, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis25(2):
119-142
.
16.
Davies, B.
and
Ellison, L.
(1998)
‘Strategic Planning in Schools: An Oxymoron?’
, School Leadership and Management18(4):
461-474
.
17.
Davies, B.
and
Ellison, L.
(1999) Strategic Direction and Development of the
School.
London: Routledge
.
18.
Davies, P.
,
Adnett, N.
and
Mangan, J.
(2002)
‘The Diversity and Dynamics of Competition: Evidence from Two
Local Schooling Markets’
, Oxford Review of Education28(1):
91-108
.
19.
Deem, R.
(1994)
‘Free Marketeers or Good Citizens? Educational Policy and Lay
Participation in the Administration of Schools’
, British Journal of Educational Studies42(1):
23-37
.
20.
Downward, P.
(1999) Pricing Theory in Post Keynesian Economics: A Realist
Approach.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
.
21.
Elfring, T.
and
Volberda, H.
(2001) ‘Schools of Thought in Strategic
Management: Fragmentation, Integration or Synthesis’, in
H. Volberda
and
T. Elfring
(eds) Rethinking Strategy.
London: SAGE
.
22.
Fink, D.
(1999)
‘Deadwood didn’t Kill itself: A Pathology of Failing Schools’
, Educational Management & Administration27(2):
131-142
.
23.
Francois, P.
(2000)
‘“Public Service Motivation” as an Argument
for Government Provision’
, Journal of Public Economics78:
275-299
.
24.
Glatter, R.
(2002) ‘Governance, Autonomy and
Accountability’, in
T. Bush
and
L. Bell
(eds) The Principles and Practice of Educational Management.
London: Paul Chapman Publishing
.
25.
Glatter, R.
,
Woods, P.
and
Bagley, C.
, eds (1996) Choice and Diversity in Schooling.
Perspectives and Prospect.
London: Routledge
.
26.
Glover, D.
,
Bennett, N.
,
Crawford, M.
and
Levaĉić, R.
(1997)
‘Strategic and Resource Management in Primary Schools: Evidence
from OFSTED Inspection Reports’
, School Leadership and Management17(3):
357-374
.
27.
Goldstein, H.
and
Woodhouse, G.
(2000)
‘School Effectiveness Research and Educational Policy’
, Oxford Review of Education26(3-4):
353-363
.
28.
Gorard, S.
(1999)
‘“Well. That about Wraps it up for School Choice
Research”: A State of the Art Review’
, School Leadership and Management19(1):
25-47
.
29.
Grace, G.
(1993)
‘On the Study of School Leadership: Beyond Education’
, British Journal of Educational Studies41(4):
353-365
.
30.
Grace, G.
(2000)
‘Research and the Challenges of the Contemporary School: The
Contribution of Critical Scholarship’
, British Journal of Educational Studies48(3):
231-247
.
31.
Gray, J.
,
Goldstein, H.
and
Thomas, S.
(2001)
‘Predicting the Future: The Role of Past Performance in
Determining Trends in Institutional Effectiveness at A Level’
, British Educational Research Journal27(4):
391-405
.
32.
Hansmann, H.
(1987) ‘Economic Theories of Nonprofit
Organisation’, in
W. Powell
(ed.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook.
New Haven: Yale University Press
.
33.
Hanushek, E.
,
Kain, J.
and
Rivkin, S.
(1999) Do Higher Salaries Buy Better Teachers? Working
Paper, 7082.
Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research
.
34.
House, E.
(1996)
‘A Framework for Appraising Educational Reforms’
, Educational Researcher25(7):
6-14
.
35.
Houston, David
(2000)
‘Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test’
, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory10(4):
713-728
.
36.
James, E.
(1983)
‘How Nonprofits Grow: A Model’
, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management2:
350-365
.
37.
Johnson, G.
and
Scholes, K.
(2001) Exploring Corporate Strategy, 6th edn.London: Prentice Hall
.
38.
Kumar, R.
(1983)
‘Economies of Scale in School Operation: Evidence from Canada’
, Applied Economics15:
323-340
.
39.
Lamdin, D.
(1995)
‘Testing for the Effect of School Size on Student Achievement
within a School District’
, Education Economics3(1):
33-42
.
40.
Levaĉić, R.
(1998)
‘Local Management of Schools in England: Results after Six Years’
, Journal of Education Policy13(3):
331-350
.
41.
Levaĉić, R.
and
Glover, D.
(1998)
‘Relationship between Efficient Resource Management and School
Effectiveness: Evidence from OFSTED Secondary School Inspections’
, School Improvement and School Effectiveness9(1):
93-122
.
42.
Merkies, A.
(2000) ‘Economies of Scale and School
Consolidation in Dutch Primary School Industry’, in
J.L.T. Blank
(ed.) Public Provision and Performance: Contributions from Efficiency
and Productivity Measurement.
Amsterdam: Elsevier
.
43.
Mintzberg, H.
(1994) The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning.
New York: Free Press
.
44.
National Audit Office
(1994) Value for Money at Grant Maintained Schools: A Review
of Performance.
London: HMSO
.
45.
Office of National Statistics
(2000) Size Analysis of UK Businesses Ref: PA1003.
London: ONS
.
46.
Perry, J.
and
Wise, L.
(1990)
‘The Motivational Bases of Public Service’
, Public Administration Review50:
367-373
.
Porter, M.E.
(1980) Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing
Industries and Competitors.
New York: Free Press
.
49.
Pugh, G.
and
Mangan, J.
(2003)
‘What’s in a Trend? Predicting the Future: The Role of
Past Performance in Determining Trends in Institutional Effectiveness at A level’
, British Educational Research Journal29(1):
77-82
.
50.
Quinn, R.
(1988) Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes
and Competing Demands of High Performance.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
.
51.
Ribchester, C.
and
Edwards, W.
(1998)
‘Co-operation in the Countryside: Small Primary School Clusters’
, Educational Studies24(3):
281-294
.
52.
Smet, M.
and
Nonneman, W.
(1998)
‘Economies of Scale and Scope in Flemish Schools’
, Applied Economics30:
1251-1258
.
53.
Steele, J.
(1999) Wasted Values: Harnessing the Commitment of Public
Managers.
London: Public Management Foundation
. Available at http://www.ipf.co.uk/bestvalue/CQF/articles.htm.
54.
Thrupp, M.
(2003)
‘The School Leadership Literature in Managerialist Times:
Exploring the Problem of Textual Apologism’
, School Leadership and Management23(2):
149-172
.
55.
Tuckman, H.P.
(1998)
‘Competition, Commercialization, and the Evolution of Nonprofit
Organizational Structures’
, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management17(2):
175-194
.
56.
Vickers, J.
(1995)
‘Concepts of Competition’
, Oxford Economic Papers47:
1-23
.
57.
Vignoles, A.
,
Levaĉić, R.
,
Walker, J.
,
Machin, S.
and
Reynolds, D.
(2000) The Relationship between Resource Allocation and Pupil
Attainment: A Review. Department for Education and Employment Research
Report RR228.
Norwich: HMSO
.
58.
West, A.
and
Pennell, H.
(2000)
‘Publishing School Examination Results in England: Incentives and Consequences’
, Educational Studies26(4):
423-436
.
