Since the wave of school reform decentralization, schools now maintain a more dynamic and diverse relationship with their environment than they did in the past. School principals’ relationships with the local educational authority (LEA) are a prominent example of this change in Israel. LEAs try to gain more pedagogic influence over schools while school principals become dependent on the LEA for financial and educational resources. This study examines school principals’ attitudes toward the proactive role of the LEAs in localities that have adopted the school based management (SBM) reform, in comparison with localities that have not. The sample includes 165 school principals, of which 47.6 per cent adopted the SBM reform. Based on a discriminant analysis, school principals in localities that adopted the SBM reform, reported that LEAs increased their pedagogic influence on schools in return for providing financial resources. In contrast, in localities that have not adopted the SBM reform, schools principals’ reported being empowered at the local level, with the LEA perceived as advising schools. The implications of this study for school—LEA power relations are discussed based on the social exchange theory.
Addi-Raccah, A. ( 2006) ‘School Leaders’ Collaboration with External School Agencies: A Comparison between Regular and Decentralized Schools’ , International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management6(2): 27-38.
2.
Addi- Raccah, A. and Mazawi, A. ( 2004) ‘Dependence on State Funding, Local Educational Opportunities, and Access to High School Credentials in Israel’, Educational Studies30: 145-58.
3.
Ainscow, M. and Howes, A. ( 2001) ‘LEAs and School Improvement: What Is It That Makes the Difference?’, paper presented at the British Education Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds.
4.
Bennett, N. and Anderson, L. ( 2005) ‘School-LEA Partnership: Recipe for Success or Chimera?’ , Journal of Educational Change6: 29-50.
5.
Blau, P. ( 1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: IVilev.
6.
Blank Y. ( 2004) ‘Decentralized Statehood in an Imperfect Word: Local Government, Segregation and Social Inequality in Public Education’ . Iyune Mishpat28(2): 347-417. [In Hebrew.]
7.
Bolman, L.G. and Deal, T.E. ( 1997) Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
8.
Bottery, M. ( 2007) ‘Reports from the Front Line: English Headteachers’ Work in an Area of Practice Centralization’, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership35(1): 89-110.
9.
Bradshaw, K.L. ( 1999) ‘Principals as Boundary Spanners: Working Collaboratively to Solve Problems’, NASSP Bulletin83(611): 38.
10.
Brighouse, T. ( 2002) ‘The View of a Participant During the Second Half—a Perspective on LEAs since 1952’, Oxford Review of Education28(2-3): 187-96.
11.
Bush, T. ( 1999) ‘The Vanishing Boundaries: The Importance of Effective External Relations’, in J. Lumby and N. Foskett (eds) Managing External Relations in Schools and Colleges, pp. 3-18. London : Paul Chapman.
12.
Caldwell, J.B. ( 2004) ‘A New Dimension to Policy on Centralisation and Decentralization in Education’, paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Comparative and International Education Society (ANZCIES) on the theme ‘Global pedagogies: Equity, access and democracy in education’ hosted by the School of Education at Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, 3-5 December 2004.
13.
Caldwell, J.B. ( 2005) School Base-Management, Educational Policy series, International Academy of Education, International Institute for Educational Planning. New York: UNESCO.
14.
Cheng, T.C. ( 2003) ‘School Leadership and Three Waves of Education Reforms’, Cambridge Journal of Education33(3): 417-23.
15.
Cheng, Y.C. ( 2002) ‘The Changing Context of School Leadership: Implications for Paradigm Shift’, in K. Leithwood and P. Hallinger (eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration , pp. 103-123. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16.
Cook, K. and Emerson, R. ( 1978) ‘Power, Equity, and Commitment in Exchange Network’ , American Sociological Review43: 721-39.
17.
Cook, K.S. and Rich, E. ( 2006) ‘Social Exchange Theory’, in J. Delamater (ed.) Handbook of Social Psychology , pp. 53-76. Hew York: Springer.
18.
Cook, K.S. and Whitmeyer, M.J. ( 1992) ‘Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis’, Annual Review of Sociology18: 109-27.
19.
Conley, D.A. ( 2003) Who Governs Our Schools? Changing Roles and Responsibilities . New-York: Teachers College Press .
20.
Datnow, A. ( 2005) ‘The Sustainability of Comprehensive School Reform Models in Changing District and State Contexts’, Educational Administration Quarterly41(1): 121-53.
21.
Earley, P. and Weindling, D. ( 2004) Understanding School Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
Emerson, R.M. ( 1962) ‘Power-Dependence Relations’, American Sociological Review27(1): 31-41.
23.
Emerson, R. ( 1972) ‘Exchange Theory, Part II: Exchange Relations and Networks’, in J. Berger, M. Zelditch Jr and B. Anderson (eds) Sociological Theories in Progress, pp. 58-87. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Fitz, J., Gorard, S. and Taylor, C. ( 2002) ‘School Admission after the School Standards and Framework Act: Bringing the LEAs Back in?’, Oxford Review of Education28(2/3): 373-93.
25.
Foskett, N. and Lumby, J. ( 2003) Leading and Managing Education: International Dimensions . London: Paul Chapman.
26.
Friedman, Y. and Bendas-Yaakov, O. ( 1998) ‘The Struggle for Management Autonomy in a Constrain Environment. Jerusalem: Szold Institution, research report #261. [in Hebrew.]
27.
Gamoran, A., Anderson, C.W., Quiroz, P.A., Secada, W.G., Williams, T. and Ashmann, S. ( 2003) Transforming Teaching in Math an Science: How Schools and Districts Can Support Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Gaziel, H. ( 1994) ‘Implementing Reforms in a Centralised Education System: The Case of Israeli Education’, Oxford Review of Education20(2): 237-52.
29.
Gaziel, H. and Romm, T. ( 1988) ‘From Centralization to Decentralization: The Cases of Israel as a Unique Pattern of Control in Education’, European Journal of Education23(4): 345.
30.
Gibton, D., Sabar, N. and Goldring, B.E. ( 2000) ‘How Principals of Autonomous Schools in Israel View Implementation of Decentralization and Restructuring Policy: Risks, Rights and Wrongs’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis22(2): 193-210.
31.
Goldring, B.E. ( 1998) ‘Educational Leadership: Schools, Environment and Boundary Spanning’, in P.M. Glatte and R. Levacic (eds) Educational Management: Strategy, Quality and Resources, pp. 290-9. Buckingham : Open University Press.
32.
Goldring, E.B. and Rallis, S. ( 1993) Principals of Dynamic Schools: Taking Charge of cChange . Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press .
33.
Hannaway, J. ( 1993) ‘Decentralization in Two School Districts: Challenging the Standard Paradigm, in J. Hannaway and M. Carnoy (eds) Decentralization and School Improvement: Can We Fulfill the Promise? pp. 135-62. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Huberty, C.J. ( 1994) Applied Discriminant Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
Inbar, D. and Chushen, M. ( 1997) Decentralization of Educational Authority in Local Government . Jerusalem: Milken Institution for the Study of Educational System.
36.
James, C., Connolly, M., Dunning, G. and Elliott, T. ( 2006) How Very Effective Primary Schools Work. London: Paul Chapman.
37.
Karlsen, G.E. ( 2000) ‘Decentralized Centralism: Framework for a Better Understanding of Governance in the Field of Education’, Journal of Educational Policy15(2): 525-36.
38.
Klecka, W.R. ( 1980) Discriminant Analysis. London : SAGE.
39.
Leithwood, K., Aitken, R. and Janzi, D. ( 2006) Making Schools Smarter: Leading with Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Crowning Press.
40.
Levačic, R. ( 1998) ‘Managing Resources in Educational Institutions: An Open System Approach’, in M. Preedy , R. Glatter and R. Levačic (eds) Educational Management: Strategy, Quality and Resources, pp. 127-36. Buckingham: Open University Press.
41.
McGinn, N. and Welsh, T. ( 1999) Decentralization of Education: Why, When, What and How?Paris: UNESCO.
42.
McLaughlin, J. and Brown, S. ( 2000) ‘Contracting for Classroom Services’ , The School Administrator57(5): 26-8.
43.
Nir, A. ( 2003) ‘Development Aspects of School-based Managing Schools’ , NCJW, Research Institution for Innovation in Education, School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem. [in Hebrew.]
44.
Ogawa, R.T., Crowson, R.L. and Goldring, B.E. ( 1999) ‘Enduring Dilemmas of School Organization’ , in J. Murphy and K.S. Louis (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Administration , pp. 277-96. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
45.
Pfeffer, J. ( 1981) Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
46.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G.R. ( 1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
47.
Powers, C.H. ( 1985) ‘Clarification and Extension of Emerson and Cook’s Exchange Theory’, Sociological Theory3(2): 58-65.
48.
Spillane, J. ( 1998) ‘State Policy and the Non-monolithic Nature of the Local School District: Organizational and Professional Considerations’ , American Educational Research Journal35(1): 33-64.
49.
Spillane, J. ( 1999) ‘State and Local Government Relations in the Era of Standards-based Reform: Standards, State Policy Instruments, and Local Instructional Policy Making’, Educational Policy13(4): 546-72.
50.
Sipple, J.W. ( 2004) ‘Local Anchors Versus State Levers in State-led School Reform: Identifying the Community Around Public Schools’, in W.K. Hoy and C.G. Miskel (eds) Educational Administration Policy and Reform , pp. 25-58. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing .
51.
Swaffield, S. ( 2005) ‘No Sleeping Partners: Relationships between Head Teachers and Critical Friends’, School Leadership and Management25(1): 43-57.
52.
Volansky, A. ( 2006) ‘Leadership in Pluralistic Societies: The Case of Israel’, ISEA34(1): 106-17.
53.
Volansky, A. ( 2007) ‘School Autonomy for School Effectiveness and Improvement: The Case of Israel’, in T. Townsend (ed.) International Handbook on School Effectiveness and Improvement, pp. 351-62. New York: Springer .
54.
Volansky, A. and Bar-Elli, D. ( 1995) ‘Moving Toward Equitable School-based Management’ , Educational Leadership53(4): 60-2.
55.
Whitaker, K.S. ( 2003) ‘Principal Role Changes and Influence on Principal Recruitment and Selection: An International Perspective’, Journal of Educational Administration41(1): 37-54.
56.
Whitbourn, S. et al. (2004) ‘What Is the LEA for? An Analysis of the Functions and Roles of the Local Educational Authority. Slough: Emie, Nfer.
57.
Wong, K.K. and Shen, F.X. ( 2003) ‘Big City Mayors and School Governance Reform: The Case of School District Takeover’, Peabody Journal of Education78(1): 5-32.
58.
Yair, G. ( 2000) ‘Servicing Professional Leadership Outstanding Educational Department in the Local Authority’, The NCJW Research Institution for Innovation in Education, Jerusalem. [in Hebrew.]
59.
Yair, G. ( 2005) ‘Not Just Location: LEAs and Inequalities among Schools’, Journal of Educational Administration43(2/3): 295-315.
