Paradigms: How Far Does Research in Distributed Leadership ‘Stretch’?

Abstract

Burrell and Morgan’s widely-cited ‘Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis’ is applied here to research on distributed leadership in education. Nearly all of the extant research is regulatory, not radical; and the evidence which it has generated falls broadly within the paradigm of interpretivism. Few studies have generated the ‘scientific’ instrumental knowledge which would place them within the paradigm of functionalism. Even fewer studies fit the paradigms of radical humanism and radical structuralism. In passing, Burrell and Morgan’s typology is compared to Ribbins and Gunter’s knowledge provinces and groups within school leadership studies.

Keywords

distributed leadership paradigms schools social theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson SE , Moore S. , Sun J (2009) Positioning the principals in patterns of school leadership distribution . In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds). Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London : Routledge, 111-36.

Bennett N. , Wise C. , Woods P. , Harvey JA ( 2003) Distributed Leadership: Full Report. Nottingham: NCSL. Available at: http://forms.ncsl.org.uk/mediastore/image2/bennett-distributed-leadership-full.pdf (accessed 10 February 2009).

Berger P. , Luckmann T. ( 1967) The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Pelican.

Boltanski L. , Chiapello E. ( 1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris : Gallimard.

Burrell G. , Morgan G. ( 1979) Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Carr W. , Kemmis S. ( 1986) Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research . London: Falmer.

Casey C. ( 1995) Work, Self and Society: After Industrialisation. London, Routledge).

Contu A. , Grey C. , Ortenblad A. ( 2003) Against learning. Human Relations 56(8): 931-52.

Coopey J. ( 1996) Crucial gaps in ‘the Learning Organisation’: power, politics and ideology. In: K Starkey (ed.) How Organizations Learn. London : International Thomson Business Press, 348-67.

10.

Culbertson JA ( 1981) Antecedents of the theory movement. Educational Administration Quarterly 17(1): 25-47.

11.

Farrell L. ( 2004) Workplace education and corporate control in global networks of interaction. Journal of Education and Work 17(4): 479-93.

12.

Fielding M. ( 2006) Leadership, personalization and high performance schooling: naming the new totalitarianism. School Leadership & Management 26(4): 347-69.

13.

Gee JP , Hull G. , Lankshear C. ( 1996) The New Work Order: Behind the Language of the New Capitalism . St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin.

14.

Goles T. , Hirschheim R. ( 2000) The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead ... long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega 28: 249-68.

15.

Greenfield TB ( 1973) Organizations as social inventions: rethinking assumptions about change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 9(5): 551-74.

16.

Greenfield TB ( 1980) The man who comes back through the door in the wall: discovering truth, discovering self, discovering organisations. Educational Administration Quarterly 16(3): 26-59.

17.

Gronn P. ( 2000) Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership . Educational Management & Administration 28(3): 317-38.

18.

Gronn P (2009) Hybrid leadership. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, 17-40.

19.

Grubb N. , Flessa JJ ( 2009) ‘A job too big for one’: multiple principals and other non-traditional approaches to school leadership. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge , 137-64.

20.

Gunter H. ( 2005) Putting education back into leadership. Forum 47(2/3): 181-7.

21.

Gunter H. ( 2006) Knowledge production in the field of educational leadership: a place for intellectual histories. Journal of Educational Administration and History 38(2): 201-15.

22.

Gunter H. , Ribbins P. ( 2003a) Challenging orthodoxy in school leadership studies: knowers, knowing and knowledge? School Leadership & Management 23(2): 129-47.

23.

Gunter H. , Ribbins P. ( 2003b) The field of educational leadership: studying maps and mapping studies. British Journal of Educational Studies 51(3): 254-81.

24.

Hargreaves A. , Fink D. ( 2008) Distributed leadership: democracy or delivery? Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 229-40.

25.

Habermas J. ( 1972) Knowledge and Human Interests. Oxford : Heinemann.

26.

Harris A. ( 2007) Distributed leadership: conceptual confusion and empirical reticence International Journal of Leadership in Education 10(3): 315-25.

27.

Hartley D. ( 2003) The instrumentalisation of the expressive in education . British Journal of Educational Studies 51(1): 6-19.

28.

Hartley D. ( 2007) The emergence of distributed leadership in England: why now? British Journal of Educational Studies 55(2): 202-14.

29.

Hartley D. ( 2009) Education policy, distributed leadership and socio-cultural theory. Educational Review 61(2): 139-50.

30.

Hassard J. ( 1991) Multiple paradigms and organisational analysis: a case study. Organisation Studies 12(2): 275-99.

31.

Huzzard T. ( 2004) Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power. Journal of Workplace Learning 16(5/6): 350-61.

32.

Hatcher R. ( 2005) The distribution of leadership and power in schools, British Journal of Sociology of Education 26(2): 253-67.

33.

Heck RH , Hallinger P. ( 2005) The study of educational leadership and management: where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33(2): 229-44.

34.

Hills J. ( 1980) A critique of Greenfield’s ‘new perspective’ . Educational Administration Quarterly 16(1): 20-44.

35.

Jackson N. , Carter P. ( 1991) In defence of paradigm incommensurability. Organization Studies 12(1): 109-27.

36.

Kuhn TS ( 1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. London: University of Chicago Press.

37.

Lakomski G. ( 2008) Functionally adequate but causally inadequate: w(h)ither distributed leadership? Journal of Educational Administration 46(2): 159-71.

38.

Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) (2009a) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge.

39.

Leithwood K. , Mascall B. , Strauss T (2009b) What we have learned and where we go from here. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London : Routledge, 269-82.

40.

Leithwood K. , Mascall B. , Strauss T. , Sacks R. , Memon N. , Yashkina A. ( 2009c) Distributing leadership to make schools smarter: taking the ego out of the system. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, 223-52.

41.

MacBeath J. ( 2005) Leadership as distributed: a matter of practice. School Leadership and Management 25(4): 349-66.

42.

MacBeath J. (2009) Distributed leadership: paradigms, policy and paradox. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge , 49-57.

43.

Matusov E. ( 2007) In search of the ‘appropriate’ unit of analysis for sociocultural research. Culture & Psychology 13(3): 307-33.

44.

Maxcy BD , Nguyen TS ( 2006) The politics of distributing leadership: reconsidering leadership distribution in two Texas elementary schools. Educational Policy 20(1): 163-96.

45.

Mayrowetz D. ( 2008) Making sense of distributed leadership: exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly 44(3): 424-35.

46.

Mayrowetz D. , Murphy J. , Seashore Lewis K. , Smylie MA ( 2009) Conceptualizing distributed leadership as a school reform: revisiting job redesign theory. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge, 167-96.

47.

Ortenblad A. ( 2002) Organisational learning: a radical perspective. International Journal of Management Reviews 4(1): 87-100.

48.

Ribbins P. ( 1985) Organisation theory and the study of educational institutions . In: Hughes M , Ribbins P , Thomas H (eds) Managing Education: the System and the Institution. London : Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 223-61.

49.

Ribbins PM ( 2006a) History and the study of administration and leadership in education: introduction to a special issue. Journal of Educational Administration and History 38(2): 113-24.

50.

Ribbins P. ( 2006b) Aesthetics and art: their place in the theory and practice of leadership in education. In: Samier EA , Bates RJ (eds) Aesthetic Dimensions of Educational Administration and Leadership. London: Routedge, 175-90.

51.

Schutz A. ( 1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

52.

Spillane JP ( 2006) Distributed Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

53.

Spillane, JP , Halverson R. , Diamond JB ( 2001) Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educational Researcher 30(3): 23-8.

54.

Spillane JP , Halverson R. , Diamond J. ( 2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Curriculum Studies 36(1): 3-34.

55.

Spillane JP , Orlina EC ( 2005) Investigating leadership practice: exploring the entailments of taking a distributed perspective. Leadership and Policy in Schools 4(3): 157-76.

56.

Spillane JP , Camburn EM , Pareja AS (2009) School principals at work: a distributed perspective. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge , 87-110.

57.

Storey A. ( 2004) The problem of distributed leadership in schools. School Leadership and Management 24(3): 249-65.

58.

Timperley HS (2009) Distributing leadership to improve outcomes for students. In: Leithwood K , Mascall B , Strauss T (eds) Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence. London: Routledge , 197-223.

59.

Touraine A. ( 2000) Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference. Macey D (trans). Cambridge: Polity Press .

60.

Vallas SP ( 2006) Empowerment redux: structure, agency, and the remaking of managerial authority. American Journal of Sociology 111(6): 1677-717.

61.

Van Schaik T. ( 2002) Social capital in the European values study surveys. Paper prepared for the OECD-ONS International Conference on Social Capital Measurement, London, 25-27 September. Available at: http://www.uvt.nl/faculteiten/feb/economie/schaik/evsoecd.pdf (accessed 5 February 2009).

62.

Watson ST , Scribner JP ( 2005) Emergent reciprocal influence: toward a framework for understanding the distribution of leadership within collaborative school activity . In: Thompson DC , Crampton FE (eds) Proceedings of the 2005 Convention of the University Council for Educational Administration Democracy in Educational Leadership: the Unfinished Journey Toward Justice, Nashville , 11-13 November. Available at: http://coe.ksu.edu/ucea/2005/WatsonUCEA2005.pdf (accessed 9 February 2009).

63.

Willmott H. ( 1993) Breaking the paradigm mentality. Organization Studies 14(5): 681-719.

64.

Woods PA ( 2004) Democratic leadership: drawing distinctions with distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education 7(1): 3-26.