Principal succession in China: A scale development and validation study

Abstract

Principal succession has gained heightened importance globally due to shortages and frequent turnover of school leaders. We argue that unique leadership strategies are needed to ensure a smooth transition and school improvement. This study aimed to develop and validate a measure for principal leadership during this crucial time. Using a multi-step scale development process, the researchers first identified five potential dimensions of succession leadership through a literature review and interviews, then used exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of samples of principals in China that led to a 14-item, four-factor model of succession leadership: institutionalization, restructuring, capacity building, and external relationships. The findings indicate that principal succession leadership is a distinct construct that targets more on institutional coherence and structural stability, which is very different from the realm of either instructional or transformational leadership. This study contributes to the limited research on principal succession by providing a robust, empirically validated measure. The scale can inform the design of principal preparation programs and professional development to equip leaders with the specialized competencies required for effective principal transitions and sustained school improvement across diverse contexts.

Keywords

School principals principal mobility succession leadership scale development mainland China

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Educational Research Association (2014) Standards for Educational & Psychological Testing (2014 Edition).

Aravena

(2022) Principal succession in schools: A literature review (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership 50(3): 354–370.

Boyce

Bowers

(2016) Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 schools and staffing survey and the 2008-2009 principal follow-up survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools 15: 237–272.

Brown

(2015) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford publications.

Bush

(2022) Succession planning for school principals: System control or leader agency? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 50(3): 351–353.

Cable

DeRue

(2002) The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(5): 875.

DeVellis

Thorpe

(2021) Scale development: Theory and applications. Los Angeles, California: Sage publications, Inc.

Fink

Brayman

(2004) Principals’ succession and educational change. Journal of Educational Administration 42(4): 431–449.

Fornell

Larcker

(1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50.

10.

Fullan

(2016) The NEW meaning of educational change. 5th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.

11.

Gabarro

(1987) The dynamics of taking charge. Boston, M.A: Harvard Business School Press.

12.

Hair

Jr Hult

GTM

Ringle

Sarstedt

Danks

Ray

(2021) Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

13.

Hallinger

Murphy

(1985) Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal 86(2): 217–247.

14.

Hargreaves

(2005) Leadership succession. The Educational Forum 69(2): 163–173.

15.

Hargreaves

Fink

(2004) The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership 61(7): 8–13.

16.

Hargreaves

ASDCR

Moore

Fink

Brayman

White

(2003) Succeeding leaders. A study of principal rotation and succession. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Principals’ Council.

17.

Hinkin

(1995) A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management 21(5): 967–988.

18.

Lahtero

Kuusilehto-Awale

(2015) Possibility to engage in pedagogical leadership as experienced by Finnish newly appointed principals. American Journal of Educational Research 3(3): 318–329.

19.

Lee

(2015) School performance trajectories and the challenges for principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration 53(2): 262–286.

20.

Legore

Parker

(1997) First year principal succession: A study of leadership, role, and change. Journal of School Leadership 7(4): 369–385.

21.

Leithwood

Harris

Strauss

(2010) Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

22.

Leithwood

Jantzi

(2005) Transformational leadership. The Essentials of School Leadership 31: 43.

23.

LNK

Zhong

Zhou

(2021) Rotating for quality and equality: A study on teachers as borrowed talents. In: Zhu

Song

(eds) Envisioning Teaching and Learning of Teachers for Excellence and Equity in Education, Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Singapore: Springer, 201–240.

24.

Lynn

(1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research 35: 382–385.

25.

Macmillan

Meyer

Northfield

(2004) Trust and its role in principal succession: A preliminary examination of a continuum of trust. Leadership and Policy in Schools 3(4): 275–294.

26.

Meyer

Macmillan

(2011) Principal succession and the micropolitics of educators in schools: Some incidental results from a larger study. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy 117: 1–26.

27.

Meyer

Macmillan

Northfield

(2009) Principal succession and its impact on teacher morale. International Journal of Leadership in Education 12(2): 171–185.

28.

Miller

(2013) Principal turnover and student achievement. Economics of Education Review 36: 60–72.

29.

Ministry of Personnel and Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (2003, September 17) Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Personnel System in Primary and Secondary School. https://www.mohrss.gov.cn/xxgk2020/fdzdgknr/zcfg/gfxwj/rcrs/201407/t20140717_136287.html

30.

MOE, MOF and MOHRSS (2014) Guan yu tui jin xian(qu) xiao zhang jiao shi jiao liu lun gang de yi jian [Opinions on advancing the rotation and exchange of school principals and teachers in counties (districts)]”, available at: http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7151/201408/t20140815_ 174493.html?authkey51v7e03 (accessed 3 Nov 2024).

31.

National Center for Education Statistics (2024) Principal Turnover: Stayers, Movers, and Leavers. Condition of Education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved [23 July 2024], from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/slb/principal-turnover.

32.

Normore

(2004) Leadership success in schools: Planning, recruitment, and socialization. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning 8(10): n10.

33.

Parylo

Zepeda

(2015) Connecting principal succession and professional learning: A cross-case analysis. Journal of School Leadership 25(5): 940–968.

34.

Rahim

Magner

(1995) Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology 80(1): 122.

35.

Richard

(2024) Novice school leaders’ turnover intentions: The role of working conditions and organizational factors. Educational Administration Quarterly 60(3): 341–378.

36.

Rothwell

(2010) Effective succession planning: Ensuring leadership continuity and building talent from within. New York: American Management Association.

37.

Schriesheim

Castro

Yammarino

(2000) Investigating contingencies: An examination of the impact of span of supervision and upward controllingness on leader–member exchange using traditional and multivariate within-and between-entities analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(5): 659.

38.

Snodgrass Rangel

(2018) A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research 88(1): 87–124.

39.

Tabachnick

Fidell

(2018) Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed. United States of America: Pearson.

40.

Taber

(2018) The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education 48: 1273–1296.

41.

Thompson

Daniel

(1996) Factor analytic evidence for the construct validity of scores: A historical overview and some guidelines. Educational and Psychological Measurement 56(2): 197–208.

42.

White

Cooper

Brayman

(2006) Case studies of principal rotation and succession policies: An international perspective. Ontario Principals’ Council (OPC).

43.

(2024) Exit and voice: A case study of the effect of the policy of rotating teachers and principals on the decision of parents to engage in school choice. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 44(2): 195–218.

44.

Yılmaz

Griffiths

Kan

(2017) Development and validation of videogame addiction scale for children (VASC). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 15: 869–882.

45.

Richardson

(2015) Examining reliability and validity of a Korean version of the community of inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. The Internet and Higher Education 25: 45–52.

46.

Zepeda

Bengtson

Parylo

(2012) Examining the planning and management of principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration 50(2): 136–158.

47.

Zheng

Qian

Chen S

and Walker A

(2024) Principal rotation in China: Policy goals and succession strategies adopted by rotated prinicpals. Journal of Educational Administration 62(4): 388–402.