How can Maternity Coaching influence Women's Re-engagement with their Career Development: A Case Study of a Maternity Coaching Programme in UK-Based Private Law Firms
Open accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2012
How can Maternity Coaching influence Women's Re-engagement with their Career Development: A Case Study of a Maternity Coaching Programme in UK-Based Private Law Firms
This article explores the influence maternity coaching has on how women re-engage with their career development after maternity leave. The study addresses the lack of understanding of the long-term influence of maternity coaching. It is based on a case study of maternity coaching in three UK based private law firms. Three key career re-engagement factors were identified: ‘work’, ‘relationships’ and ‘role models’. Maternity coaching was found to influence these factors by supporting women during the return to work phase at an emotional level, a practical level and through long-term career development reflections. The findings could be relevant in other sectors with similar working conditions, for coaching after career breaks, and could inform coaching programmes for professional parents regardless of their gender.
AdlerN. (2006). Coaching executives: Women succeeding globally. In: GoldsmithM., & LyonsL. (Eds.). Coaching for Leadership, 2nd edn. pp. 237–244. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
2.
ArunS., ArunT. & BorooahV. (2004). The effect of career breaks on the working lives of women, Feminist Economics, 10(1), 64–84.
3.
BrownL. (2010). The relationship between motherhood and professional advancement: Perceptions versus reality, Employee Relations, 32(5), 470–494.
4.
BussellJ. (2008). Great expectations: Can maternity coaching affect the retention of professional women?International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, Special Issue No. 2, 14–26.
5.
CormierD. (2007). Retaining top women business leaders: strategies for ending the exodus, Business Strategy Series, 8(4), 262–269.
6.
CreswellJ. (2007) Qualitative inquiry and research design. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7.
DesvauxG., Devillard-HoellingerM. & MeaneyM. (2008) A business case for women, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 26–33.
GallosJ. (1989). Exploring Women's development: implications for career theory, practice and research. In: ArthurM., HallD., & LawrenceB. (Eds.) Handbook of career theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
GriffithsJ. (2006). The need to nurture. People Management, 12(9), 16–17.
13.
HallL. (2009). Equality bill brings maternity coaching to the forefront, Coaching at Work, 4(4), 10.
14.
HartleyJ. (2004). Case study research. In CassellC. & SymonsG. (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. pp 323–333. London: Sage.
15.
Harrison (2008) Maternity plan delivers the goods, Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(4), 28.
16.
KingN. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In CassellC. & SymonsG. (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. pp. 256–270. London: Sage.
LeimonA., MoscoviciF. & GoodierH. (2011). Coaching women to lead. Hove: Routledge.
19.
Liston-SmithJ. (2010). Maternity coaching: The business case. Retrieved 19/11/2010 from http://www.myfamilycare.co.uk
20.
Ludeman (2009). Coaching with women. In PassmoreJ. (Ed.) Diversity coaching. pp. 237–54. London: Kogan Page.
21.
McDonaldP., Bradley, & BrownK. (2008). Visibility in the workplace: still an essential ingredient for career success?The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(12), 2198–2215.
22.
MetzI. (2005). Advancing the careers of women with children, Career Development International, 10(3), 228–245.
23.
NicholsonN. & WestM. (1989). Transitions, work histories, and careers. In: ArthurM., HallD., & LawrenceB. (Eds.) Handbook of Career Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
O'DonoghueJ. (2008). The maternity brain drain: can coaching or mentoring help? (Unpublished masters dissertation). Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
25.
O'NeilD., & BilimoriaD. (2005) Women's career development phases: Idealism, endurance, and reinvention, Career Development International, 10(3), 168–189.
26.
O'NeilD., HopkinsM. & BilimoriaD. (2008). Women's careers at the start of the 21st century: Patterns and paradoxes, Journal of Business Ethics, 80(4), 727–743.
27.
PeltierB. (2010). The psychology of executive coaching. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
28.
QuesenberryJ., TrauthE. & MorganA. (2006). Understanding the ‘mommy tracks': A framework for analyzing work-family balance in the IT workforce’, Information Resources Management Journal, 19(2), 37–53.
29.
RudermanM. & OhlottP. (2005). Leading roles - What coaches of women need to know, Leadership in action, 25(3), 3–9.
30.
SaundersM., LewisP. & ThornhillA. (2007). Research methods for business students, 4th ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
31.
SealyR. & SinghV. (2009). The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women's work identity development’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 284–299.
32.
SparrowS. (2006, 17January). Ways of keeping mum, Personnel Today, 46.
33.
SparrowS. (2008, 20January). Keeping mum, Training & Coaching Today, 18–19.
34.
SparrowS. (2009, 20January). Back to work without a bump, Personnel Today, 16.
35.
The Law Society (2007). Quality of Life - Survey. London: The Law Society.
36.
The Law Society (2011). Obstacles and barriers to the career development of women solicitors. London: The Law Society.
37.
Working Families (2008). Legal lives - Research report. London: Working Families.
38.
WycherleyI. & CoxE. (2008). Factors in the selection and matching of executive coaches in organisations, Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 1(1), 39–53.
