Objective: To describe the impacts of recent Oregon Health Plan (OHP) policy changes on individuals living with chronic illness in Oregon.
Methods: A mail survey was conducted of 1374 OHP beneficiaries who were directly affected by the new policies. The analyses reported in this article represent baseline findings from the first of three survey waves in an ongoing prospective cohort study.
Results: A significant association was found between Medicaid policy changes and high rates of disenrolment from the OHP. Compared to the non-chronically ill, the chronically ill were more likely to report inability to pay for medications, higher medical debt, more unmet health needs, and poorer health status. Among the chronically ill, those who lost insurance reported decreased access to and utilization of healthcare, more medical debt, and more restriction of medications.
Discussion: As policy-makers restructure public programmes to accommodate tight budgets and rising healthcare costs, people with chronic illness can easily be overlooked. Chronically ill individuals face disproportionate financial and health burdens. Small cost-saving policy changes can lead to widespread disenrolment that cascades into reduced access to healthcare services, altered utilization patterns, and financial strain.
Bodenheimer T.The Oregon Health Plan — lessons for the nation: first of two parts. N Engl J Med1997; 337(9): 651—5.
2.
Office for Oregon Health Policy and Research.HRSA State Planning Grant Final Report. Salem, MA: OHPR, 2001.
3.
Smith V., Ramesh R., Gifford K., Ellis E., Rudowitz R., O'Malley M.The continuing Medicaid budget challenge: state Medicaid spending growth and cost containment in fiscal years 2003 and 2004, results from a 50-state survey . Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2004.
4.
Reed M., Tu H.Triple jeopardy: low income, chronically ill and ininsured in America. Issue Brief No. 49. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change, 2002.
5.
Oregon Department of Human Services.Analysis of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. Salem, MA: ODHS, 2003.
6.
Ayanian J., Zasleysky A., Weissman J., Schneider E., Ginsburg J.Undiagnosed hypertension and hypercholesterolemia among uninsured and insured adults in the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Am J Public Health2003; 93: 2051—4.
7.
Hwang W., Weller W., Ireys H., Anderson G.Out-of-pocket medical spending for care of chronic conditions. Health Affairs2001; 20: 267—78.
8.
Tu H.Rising health costs, medical debt and chronic conditions. Issue Brief No. 88. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change, 2004.
9.
Heisler M., Langa K., Eby E., Fendrick A., Kabeto M., Piette J.The health effects of restricting prescription medication use because of cost . Med Care2004; 42: 626—34.
10.
Piette J., Wagner T., Potter M., Schillinger D.Health insurance status, cost-related medication underuse, and outcomes among diabetes patients in three systems of care. Med Care2004; 42: 102—9.
11.
Tamblyn R., Laprise E., Hanley J., et al. Adverse events associated with prescription drug cost-sharing among poor elderly persons. JAMA2001; 285: 421—9.
12.
Piette J., Heisler M., Wagner T.Problems paying out-of-pocket medication costs among older adults with diabetes . Diabetes Care2004; 27: 384—91.
13.
Ayanian J., Weissman J., Schneider E., Ginsburg J., Zasleysky A.Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. JAMA2000; 284: 2061—9.
14.
Hafner-Eaton C.Physician utilization disparities between the uninsured and insured. Comparisons of the chronically ill, acutely ill, and well nonelderly populations. JAMA1993 ; 269: 787—92.
15.
Weissman GS , Gastonis C., Epstein AMRates of avoidable hospitalization by insurance status in Massachusetts and Maryland. JAMA1992; 268: 2388—94.
16.
Bindman A., Grumbach K., Osmond D.Preventable hospitalizations and access to health care. JAMA1995; 274: 305—11.
17.
Oster A., Bindman A.Emergency department visit for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: insights into preventable hospitalizations. Med Care2003; 41: 198—207.
18.
Lurie N., Ward N., Shapiro MF, Brook RHTermination of Medi-Cal: does it affect health?N Engl J Med1984; 311: 480—4.
19.
Lurie N., Ward NB, Shapiro MF, Gallego C., Vaghaiwalla R., Brook RHTermination of MediCal benefits: a follow-up study one year later. N Engl J Med1986; 314: 1266—8.
20.
Weissman J. , Witzburg P., Campbell E.Termination from Medicaid: how does it affect access, continuity of care, and willingness to purchase insurance?J Health Care Poor Underserved1999; 10: 122—37.
21.
Wright B., Carlson M., Edlund C., DeVoe J., Gallia C., Smith J.The impact of increased cost sharing on adults enrolled in Medicaid: early results from a prospective cohort study. Health Affairs2005; 24: 1106—16.
22.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.CAHPS 2.0 survey and reporting kit. Silver Springs, MD : AHRQ, 2002.
23.
Center for Studying Health System Change.Community Tracking Survey, Household Survey Instrument 2000—2001, Round Three. Technical Publication #54. Washington, DC: Center for Studying Health System Change, 2004.
24.
Ware J., Kolinski M., Keller S.How to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summaries: a user's manual . Boston, MA: The Health Institute , New England Medical Centre, 1995 .
25.
Oregon Department of Human Services.OHP Eligibility Report, month ending December 2002. Salem, OR: Department of Human Services, 2003.
26.
Zuckerman S. , Shen Y.Characteristics of occasional and frequent emergency department users: do insurance coverage and access to care matter?Med Care2004; 42: 176—82.
27.
Rask K., Williams M., McNagny S., Parker R., Baker D.Ambulatory health care use by patients in a public hospital emergency department . J Gen Intern Med1998; 13: 614—20.
28.
Hawkins D., Schwartz R.Health centers and the states: partnership potential to address the fiscal crisis. J Ambulatory Care Manag2003; 26: 285—95.
29.
Guyatt G., Feeny D., Patrick D.Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med1993; 118: 622—9.
30.
Conviser R.A brief history of the Oregon Health Plan and its features. Salem, OR: Oregon Office for Health Policy and Research , 1995.
