How effective are the linkages between self-management programmes and primary care providers,especially for disadvantaged patients?

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the extent and effectiveness of strategies that have been used to improve linkages between primary healthcare (PHC) and chronic disease self-management programmes, especially for disadvantaged patients.

Methods: A systematic review of the published peer-reviewed literature. Studies conducted in an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development country evaluating a group self-management programme of at least 4-week duration with some linkage between PHC and the programme were included. Linkage strategies were qualitatively derived. Studies were descriptively analysed in terms of the type of self-management programme, strategy for linking with PHC, culturally and linguistically diverse and socio-economic status and impact on health service usage.

Results: Sixteen studies were identified that used linkage strategies for a variety of functions—supporting communication, ongoing clinical care, programme development, recruitment or implementation. Of the four studies that evaluated impact on health service use, only one reported a positive change.

Discussion: Few programmes of self-management support included specific strategies to increase linkages with PHC as part of their intervention. There is insufficient evidence to determine which strategies or linkages are more effective and in what context.

Keywords

Chronic illness Disadvantaged groups Linkages Primary healthcare Self-management support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the future. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.

Swerissen H. , Belfrage J. , Weeks A. , et al. A randomised trial of a self-management program for people with a chronic illness from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian Greek backgrounds. Patient Educ Couns 2006 ; 64: 360-68.

National Health Priority Action Council (NHPAC). National chronic disease strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2006.

Lorig K. Partnerships between expert patients and physicians. Lancet 2002; 359: 814-15.

Lorig K. , Holman H. , Sobel D. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions, Palo Alto , California: Bull Publishing Company, 1994.

Blakeman T. , Macdonald W. , Bower P. , Gately C. , Chew-Graham C. A qualitative study of GPs attitudes to self-management of chronic disease . Br J Gen Pract 2006; 56: 407-14.

Zwar N. , Harris M. , Griffiths R. , Roland M. , Dennis S. , Powell Davies G. A systematic review of chronic disease management. Canberra : Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute , 2006.

Chodosh J. , Morton SC , Mojica W. , Maglione M. Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 427-38.

Barlow J. , Wright C. , Sheasby J. , Turner A. , Hainsworth J. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review . Patient Educ Couns 2002; 48: 177-87.

10.

Lorig KR , Sobel DS , Stewart AL , et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. American Public Health Association. Med Care 1999; 37: 5-14.

11.

Kennedy A. , Reeves D. , Bower P. , et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007; 61: 254-61.

12.

Eakin EG , Bull SS , Glasgow RE , Mason M. Reaching those most in need: a review of diabetes self-management interventions in disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2002; 18: 26-35.

13.

Jordan JE , Osborne RH Chronic disease self-management education programs: challenges ahead . MJA 2007; 186: 84-87.

14.

Williams A. , Harris M. , Daffurn K. , Powell Davies G. , Pascoe S. , Zwar N. Sustaining chronic disease management in primary care: lessons from a demonstration project. Aust J Prim Health 2007; 13: 121-28.

15.

Starfield B. Primary care: balancing health needs, services and technology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998: 129-39.

16.

Council of Australian Governments. Australian better health initiative. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments, 2007.

17.

Powell Davies G. , Perkins D. , McDonald J. , Williams A. Integrated primary health care in Australia . Int J Integr Care 2009; 9: 1-9.

18.

Harris MF , Williams AM , Dennis SM , Zwar NA , Powell Davies G. Chronic disease self-management: implementation with and within Australian general practice. MJA 2008; 189: S17-20.

19.

Davis K. , Schoen C. , Stremikis K. Mirror, mirror on the wall: how the performance of the U.S. Health Care System compares internationally 2010 update. US: The Commonwealth Fund, 2010.

20.

Starfield B. The primary solution put doctors where they count. Reforming health care Boston review, November/December 2005. Available at: http://bostonreview.net/BR30.6/starfield.php . (accessed April 10, 2010).

21.

Bodenheimer T. , Lorig K. , Holman H. , Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002 ; 288: 2469-75.

22.

Jordan JE , Briggs AM , Brand CA , Osborne RH Enhancing patient engagement in chronic disease self-management support initiatives in Australia: the need for an integrated approach. MJA 2008; 189: S9-13.

23.

Zwar N. , Dennis S. , Griffiths R. , Perkins D. , May J. , Sibbald B. Optimising skill mix in the primary health care workforce for the care of older Australians: a systematic review. Canberra : Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute , 2007 .

24.

Australian Bureau of Statistics. Health literacy, Australia. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006.

25.

Institute of Medicine. Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004.

26.

Williams J. , Clemens S. , Oleinikova K. , Tarvin K. The skills for life survey. A national needs and impact survey of literacy, numeracy and ICT skills. London: Department for Education and Skills, 2003.

27.

Stanford Patient Education Research Center. Chronic disease self-management program. California : Stanford Patient Education Research Center, 1996.

28.

Lorig KR , Ritter PL , González VM Hispanic chronic disease self-management: a randomized community-based outcome trial. Nurs Res 2003; 52: 361-69.

29.

Aihw. Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia, 2006. Cat. no. PHE 81. Canberrra: AIHW , 2006.

30.

McDonald J. , Harris E. , Kurti L. , Furler J. , Apollini L. , Tudball J. Action on health inequalities: early intervention and chronic condition self management. Sydney: University of New South Wales, 2004.