Associations between having an informal caregiver,social support,and self-care among low-income adults with poorly controlled diabetes

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether the presence of an informal caregiver and the patient’s level of social support are associated with better diabetes self-care among adults with poorly controlled diabetes.

Methods

Cross-sectional study using baseline data from 253 adults of age 30–70 with poorly controlled diabetes. Participants who reported receiving assistance with their diabetes from a friend or family member in the past month were classified as having a caregiver. We used multivariate linear and logistic regression models to evaluate the associations between having a caregiver and level of social support with five self-reported diabetes self-care behaviors: diet, foot checks, blood glucose monitoring, medications, and physical activity.

Results

Compared to participants with no informal caregiver, those with an informal caregiver were significantly more likely to report moderate or high medication adherence (OR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.07–3.49, p = 0.028). When we included social support in the model, having a caregiver was no longer significantly associated with medication adherence (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 0.80–2.82), but social support score was (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03–1.45, p = 0.023).

Discussion

Among low-income adults with poorly controlled diabetes, having both an informal caregiver and high social support for diabetes may have a beneficial effect on medication adherence, a key self-care target to improve diabetes control.

Keywords

Caregiver social support diabetes self-care adherence self-management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics/2014StatisticsReport.html (2014, accessed 13 March 2016).

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977–986.

Haas

Maryniuk

Beck

et al.

National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diab Care 2014; 37: S144–S153.

Selvin

Parrinello

Sacks

et al.

Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the U.S., 1988–1994 and 1999–2010. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 517–525.

Juarez

Sentell

Tokumuaru

et al.

Factors associated with poor glycemic control or wide glycemic variability among diabetes patients in Hawaii, 2006–2009. Prev Chronic Dis 2012; 9: 120065–120065.

Gallant

. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003; 30: 170–195.

Trivedi

Bryson

Udris

et al.

The influence of informal caregivers on adherence in COPD patients. Ann Behav Med 2012; 44: 66–72.

Aggarwal

Liao

Mosca

. Medication adherence is associated with having a caregiver among cardiac patients. Ann Behav Med 2013; 46: 237–242.

Mosca

Aggarwal

Mochari-Greenberger

et al.

Association between having a caregiver and clinical outcomes 1 year after hospitalization for cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol 2012; 109: 135–139.

10.

Aggarwal

Liao

Allegrante

et al.

Low social support level is associated with non-adherence to diet at 1 year in the Family Intervention Trial for Heart Health (FIT Heart). J Nutr Educ Behav 2010; 42: 380–388.

11.

Strom

Egede

. The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep 2012; 12: 769–781.

12.

Langa

Vijan

Hayward

et al.

Informal caregiving for diabetes and diabetic complications among elderly Americans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002; 57: S177–S186.

13.

Di Matteo

. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 2004; 23: 207–218.

14.

Rosland

Kieffer

Israel

et al.

When is social support important? The association of family support and professional support with specific diabetes self-management behaviors. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 1992–1999.

15.

Nicklett

Liang

. Diabetes-related support, regimen adherence, and health decline among older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2010; 65B: 390–399.

16.

Gao

Wang

Zheng

et al.

Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 66–66.

17.

Rosland

Piette

Lyles

et al.

Social support and lifestyle vs. medical diabetes self-management in the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Ann Behav Med 2014; 48: 438–447.

18.

Heaney

Israel

Chapter 9: Social Networks and Social Support. In: Glanz

Rimer

Viswanath

(eds). Health behavior and health education, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass, 2008, pp. 189–210.

19.

Polonsky

Henry

. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its contributors. Patient Prefer Adher 2016; 10: 1299–1307.

20.

Nelson

Drain

Robinson

et al.

Peer Support for Achieving Independence in Diabetes (Peer-AID): design, methods and baseline characteristics of a randomized controlled trial of community health worker assisted diabetes self-management support. Contemp Clin Trials 2014; 38: 361–369.

21.

Talbot

Nouwen

Gingras

et al.

The assessment of diabetes-related cognitive and social factors: the Multidimensional Diabetes Questionnaire. J Behavio Med 1997; 20: 291–312.

22.

Toobert

Hampson

Glasgow

. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diab Care 2000; 23: 943–950.

23.

Morisky

Green

Levine

. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medicaiton adherence. Med Care 1986; 24: 67–74.

24.

Morisky

Ang

Krousel-Wood

et al.

Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008; 10: 348–354.

25.

Moskowitz

Thom

Hessler

et al.

Peer coaching to immprove diabetes self-management: which patients benefit most?

J Gen Intern Med 2013; 28: 938–942.

26.

Al Hayek

Rober

Al Dawish

et al.

Impact of an education program on patient anxiety, depression, glycemic control, and adherence to self-care and medication in Type 2 diabetes. J Family Commun Med 2013; 20: 77–82.

27.

International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Short last 7 Days Telephone Format, http://www.ipaq.ki.se (2002, accessed 13 March 2016).

28.

Boyer

Earp

. The development of an instrument for assessing the quality of life of people with diabetes: Diabetes-39. Med Care 1997; 35: 440–453.

29.

McDowell

Courtney

Edwards

et al.

Validataion of the Australian/English version of the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale. Int J Nurs Pract 2005; 11: 177–184.

30.

Aikens

Zivin

Trivedi

et al.

Diabetes self-management support using mHealth and enhanced informal caregiving. J Diab Complicat 2014; 28: 171–176.

31.

Piette

Striplin

Marinec

et al.

A mobile health intervention supporting heart failure patients and their informal caregivers: a comparative effectiveness trial. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17: e142–e142.

32.

Rosland

Piette

. Emerging models for mobilizing family support for chronic disease management: a structured review. Chronic Illn 2010; 6: 7–21.

33.

Scarton

Bakas

Poe

et al.

Needs and concerns of family caregivers of American Indians, African Americans, and Caucasians with type 2 diabetes. Clin Nurs Res 2014; 12: pii–pii.

34.

Mayberry

Osborn

. Family involvement is helpful and harmful to patients’ self-care and glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns 2014; 97: 418–425.