To change or not to change – That is the question: A qualitative study of lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate key factors related to lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) by eliciting survivors’ subjective needs for, attitudes towards and experiences with behaviour changes in their everyday life to improve future interventions promoting lifestyle changes.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 individuals who had recently experienced an AMI. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results

The data analysis revealed that lifestyle changes following AMI are influenced by a combination of individual (physical and psychological) and social factors that can be grouped into facilitators and barriers. The interviews indicated the need for more personalised information regarding the causes and risk factors of illness, the benefits of lifestyle changes and the importance of including significant others in lifestyle advice and education and of individualising support.

Discussion

Lifestyle change is a continuous process that is not completed within a few months after a cardiac event. Considering the identified themes when developing interventions to promote lifestyle changes following AMI may enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of such interventions.

Keywords

Chronic illness acute myocardial infarction lifestyle changes behaviour change qualitative design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Roger

Lloyd-Jones

et al.

Heart disease and stroke statistics–2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: e18–e209.

Brink

Karlson

Hallberg

LR-M

. Readjustment 5 months after a first-time myocardial infarction: reorienting the active self. J Adv Nurs 2006; 53: 403–411.

Mayou

Gill

Thompson

et al.

Depression and anxiety as predictors of outcome after myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med 2000; 62: 212–219.

Rosengren

Hawken

Ôunpuu

et al.

Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11119 cases and 13648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 953–962.

Yusuf

Hawken

Ounpuu

et al.

Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364: 937–952.

Sdringola

Nakagawa

et al.

Combined intense lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 41: 263–272.

Wood

. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. Lancet 2001; 357: 995–1001.

Murray

Craigs

Hill

et al.

A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2012; 12: 120–120.

Wiles

Kinmonth

A-L

. Patients’ understandings of heart attack: implications for prevention of recurrence. Patient Educ Couns 2001; 44: 161–169.

10.

Petrie

Cameron

Ellis

et al.

Changing illness perceptions after myocardial infarction: an early intervention randomized controlled trial. Psychosom Med 2002; 64: 580–586.

11.

Petty

Cacioppo

. The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: central and peripheral routes to persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984; 46: 69–81.

12.

Jensen

Petersson

. The illness experiences of patients after a first time myocardial infarction. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 123–131.

13.

Kayaniyil

Ardern

Winstanley

et al.

Degree and correlates of cardiac knowledge and awareness among cardiac inpatients. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 75: 99–107.

14.

Rushford

Murphy

Worcester

MUC

et al.

Recall of information received in hospital by female cardiac patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2007; 14: 463–469.

15.

Hanssen

Nordrehaug

Hanestad

. A qualitative study of the information needs of acute myocardial infarction patients, and their preferences for follow-up contact after discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2005; 4: 37–44.

16.

Murray

Honey

Hill

et al.

Individual influences on lifestyle change to reduce vascular risk: a qualitative literature review. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2012; 62: e403–e410.

17.

Condon

McCarthy

. Lifestyle changes following acute myocardial infarction: patients perspectives. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2006; 5: 37–44.

18.

Gregory

Bostock

Backett-Milburn

. Recovering from a heart attack: a qualitative study into lay experiences and the struggle to make lifestyle changes. Fam Pract 2006; 23: 220–225.

19.

Fålun

Fridlund

Schaufel

et al.

Patients’ goals, resources, and barriers to future change: a qualitative study of patient reflections at hospital discharge after myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2016; 15: 495–503.

20.

McSweeney

Coon

. Women’s inhibitors and facilitators associated with making behavioral changes after myocardial infarction. Medsurg Nurs 2004; 13: 49–49.

21.

Bennett

Marte

. Patient attributions for cardiac events: predictors of physical and psychological recovery. J Appl Soc Psychol 2013; 43: 660–672.

22.

Creswell

. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, Los Angeles: SAGE, 2003.

23.

Hsieh

H-F

Shannon

. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277–1288.

24.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349–357.

25.

Bühringer

et al.

Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in Germany, Seattle: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, 2002.

26.

Rubak

Sandbæk

Lauritzen

et al.

Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2005; 55: 305–312.

27.

Rollnick

Miller

Butler

. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior applications of motivational interviewing, New York: Guilford Publications, 2007.

28.

Gaglio

Glasgow

Bull

. Do patient preferences for health information vary by health literacy or numeracy? A qualitative assessment. J Health Commun 2012; 17: 109–121.

29.

Kreuter

Holt

. How do people process health information? Applications in an age of individualized communication. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2001; 10: 206–209.

30.

Timmins

Kaliszer

. Information needs of myocardial infarction patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs J Work Group Cardiovasc Nurs Eur Soc Cardiol 2003; 2: 57–65.

31.

Fix

Bokhour

. Understanding the context of patient experiences in order to explore adherence to secondary prevention guidelines after heart surgery. Chronic Illn 2012; 8: 265–277.

32.

Thompson

Chair

Chan

et al.

Motivational interviewing: a useful approach to improving cardiovascular health?

J Clin Nurs 2011; 20: 1236–1244.

33.

Cole

Smith

Hart

et al.

Do practitioners and friends support patients with coronary heart disease in lifestyle change? A qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14: 126–126.

34.

JoÃo Figueiras

Weinman

. Do similar patient and spouse perceptions of myocardial infarction predict recovery? Psychol Health 2003; 18: 201–216.

35.

Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Sozialforschung/Forum: Qual Soc Res, 1(2), http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1089 (2000, accessed 30 May 2013).