To explore the care experiences of spouses as long-term and primary caregivers for disabled older adults in China.
Methods
A descriptive phenomenological method was used in this study, as well as purposive and convenient sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 spousal caregivers in Guangdong, China, from March to December 2021. Interview audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and data were analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis method.
Results
We identified four themes from the data: spousal care motivation; sacrifices in caregiving; obstacles in caregiving; spousal caregivers’ positive experiences.
Conclusions
Spouses took responsibility for providing care for their disabled partners regardless of their willingness. They had positive experiences while providing care, but negative experiences were dominant, especially for spouses of severely disabled older adults. Spouses are always perfect in caregiving roles, although they may also need medical assistance. To prevent a decline in spousal caregivers’ quality of life and relieve their care burdens, health care providers should support them as soon as possible or offer formal care for disabled older adults. It is necessary to intervene considering disabled older adults and their spousal caregivers as a unit to empower their confidence in coping with life together.
LuoYSuBZhengX. Trends and challenges for population and health during population aging – China, 2015–2050. China CDC Weekly2021; 3: 593–598.
2.
MeiWBHsuCYOuSJ. Research on evaluation indexes and weights of the aging-friendly community public environment under the community home-based pension model. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: E2863.
3.
FengZGlinskayaEChenH, et al.Long-term care system for older adults in China: Policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. Lancet2020; 396: 1362–1372.
4.
ZhouJYangL. Who is taking care of the Chinese functionally impaired older people? The characteristics of family caregivers from China health and retirement longitudinal study. Australas J Ageing2021; 40: e143–e154.
5.
ZhouYLiYZhuX, et al.Medical and old-age care integration model and implementation of the integrated care of older people (ICOPE) in China: opportunities and challenges. J Nutr Health Aging2021; 25: 720–723.
6.
LiuHLouVWQ. Transitioning into spousal caregiving: contribution of caregiving intensity and caregivers’ multiple chronic conditions to functional health. Age Ageing2019; 48: 108–114.
7.
HoffmanGJBurgardSMendez-LuckCA, et al.Interdependence in health and functioning among older spousal caregivers and care recipients. West J Nurs Res2019; 41: 685–703.
8.
NorinderMÅrestedtKLindS, et al.Higher levels of unmet support needs in spouses are associated with poorer quality of life - a descriptive cross-sectional study in the context of palliative home care. BMC Palliat Care2021; 20: 132.
9.
SwinkelsJCvan TilburgTGBroese van GroenouM. Why do spouses provide personal care? A study among care-receiving Dutch community-dwelling older adults. Health Soc Care Community2022; 30: e953–e961.
10.
ChenYC. Chinese Values, health and nursing. J Adv Nurs2001; 36: 270–273.
11.
GongWZhuMGürelB, et al.The lineage theory of the regional variation of individualism/collectivism in China. Front Psychol2020; 11: 596762.
12.
SoneTNakayaNTomataY, et al.Spouse’s functional disability and mortality: The Ohsaki cohort 2006 study. Geriatr Gerontol Int2019; 19: 774–779.
13.
MicklerAKLeffBEaton EnglandA, et al.Understanding the daily experiences and perceptions of homebound older adults and their caregivers: A qualitative study. J Appl Gerontol2021; 40: 1722–1732.
14.
van ManenMvan ManenM. Doing phenomenological research and writing. Qual Health Res2021; 31: 1069–1082.
15.
YingYHuangLShenL, et al.Rehabilitation psychological experience of the elderly within 6 months of initial disability: A qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil2020; 44: 2332–2339.
16.
KatzSDownsTDCashHR, et al.Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontologist1970; 10: 20–30.
17.
HenninkMMKaiserBNMarconiVC. Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?Qual Health Res2017; 27: 591–608.
18.
ColaizziPF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In: ValleRSKingM (eds) Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1978, pp.48–71.
19.
GraneheimUHLindgrenBLundmanB. Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Educ Today2017; 56: 29–34.
20.
SolomiVLCasidayRE. In sickness and in health: the strains and gains of caring for a chronically ill or disabled spouse. Chronic Illn2017; 13: 75–87.
21.
TurnerMKingCMilliganC, et al.Caring for a dying spouse at the end of life: ‘it’s one of the things you volunteer for when you get married’: A qualitative study of the oldest carers’ experiences. Age Ageing2016; 45: 421–426.
22.
MoninJKLevyBDoyleM, et al.The impact of both spousal caregivers’ and care recipients’ health on relationship satisfaction in the caregiver health effects study. J Health Psychol2019; 24: 1744–1755.
23.
SuZHuZPengX. The impact of changes in China's family patterns on family pension functions. Int J Health Plann Manage2017; 32: 351–362.
24.
SoneTNakayaNTomataY, et al.Risk of psychological distress in partners with functional disability among older Japanese adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int2018; 18: 775–782.
25.
PolenickCAKalesHCBirdittKS. Perceptions of purpose in life within spousal care dyads: Associations with emotional and physical caregiving difficulties. Ann Behav Med2018; 52: 77–87.
26.
JohanssonMFMcKeeKJDahlbergL, et al.A comparison of spouse and non-spouse carers of people with dementia: A descriptive analysis of Swedish national survey data. BMC Geriatr2021; 21: 338.
27.
ChowEOWWongYYFokDYH, et al.Positive life stories of stroke-survivor’s spousal caregiving in Hong Kong: Lessons for policy and practice. Soc Sci Med2021; 291: 114476.
28.
BouchardKGreenmanPSPipeA, et al.Reducing caregiver distress and cardiovascular risk: A focus on caregiver-patient relationship quality. Can J Cardiol2019; 35: 1409–1411.
29.
ZhaoXLiDZhangQ, et al.Spousal concordance in frailty predicting mental and functional health decline: A four-year follow-up study of older couples in urban and rural China. J Clin Nurs2022; 31: 679–688.
30.
BennichBBMunchLOvergaardD, et al.Experience of family function, family involvement, and self-management in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: A thematic analysis. J Adv Nurs2020; 76: 621–631.
31.
AnkudaCKMaustDTKabetoMU, et al.Association between spousal caregiver well-being and care recipient healthcare expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc2017; 65: 2220–2226.
32.
AloweniFDoshiKFook-ChongS, et al.The types of caregiving reactions experienced by the older spouse caregivers. J Clin Nurs2019; 28: 4538–4548.
33.
HuangWHeBWangYH, et al.Disability severity and home-based care quality in older adults: The mediating effects of social support and caregiver competence. J Nurs Res2020; 28: e122.
