The importance of national language as a level of discourse within individuals’ theorising of leadership — A qualitative study of German and English employees
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online November, 2010
The importance of national language as a level of discourse within individuals’ theorising of leadership — A qualitative study of German and English employees
This article adds to the leadership discourse literature as it explores the so far neglected role of national language as a level within an individual’s order of discourses, its relation to other discourses and its possible impact on the individual’s action theory of leadership. It does so by building upon and integrating several existing approaches to linguistic relativity hypothesis, discourse analysis and individual action theories. This article further analyses data from a qualitative study in the German and UK chemical industries to show that national language is an important discourse affecting an individual’s action theory of leadership. National language is argued to be setting boundaries to an individual’s sense-making of leadership through its fundamental influence on an individual’s conversational repertoire.
Agar M. ( 1994) Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation . New York: Morrow and Company.
2.
Alvesson M. and Karreman D. ( 2000) Varieties of discourse: On the study of discourse analysis . Human Relations53(9): 1125-1149.
3.
Alvesson M. and Skoldberg K. ( 2000) Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research . London: Sage.
4.
Armbruester T. ( 2004) Management and Organization in Germany. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
5.
Bass BM ( 1990) Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications. New York: Free Press.
6.
Bennis WG and Nanus B. ( 1985) Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper & Row.
7.
Czarniawska B. and Joerges B. ( 1996) Travels of ideas. In: Czarniawska B and Sevon G (eds) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 13-48.
8.
Dachler HP ( 1988) Constraints on the Emergence of New Vistas in Leadership and Management Research: An epistemological Overview. In: Hunt JG, Baliga BR , Dachler HP and Schriesheim CA (eds) Emerging Leadership Vistas. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 261-286.
9.
Dickson MW, Den Hartog DN and Mitchelson JK ( 2003) Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. Leadership Quarterly14(6): 729-768.
Fairclough N. ( 2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research . Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
12.
Fairhurst GT ( 2005) Reframing the art of framing: Problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership1(2): 165-185.
13.
Ford J. ( 2006) Discourse of leadership: Gender, identity and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership2(1): 77-99.
14.
Ford J. and Harding N. ( 2007) Move over management: We are all leaders now. Management Learning38(5): 475-493.
15.
Ford J., Harding N. and Learmonth M. ( 2008) Leadership as Identity. Basingstoke , UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
16.
French R. and Simpson P. ( 2006) Downplaying leadership: Researching how leaders talk about themselves. Leadership2(4): 469-479.
17.
Gosling J. and Mintzberg H. ( 2003) The five minds of a manager. Harvard Business Review81(11): 54-63.
18.
Grant D., Keenoy T. and Oswick C. ( 2001) Organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization31(3): 5-24.
19.
Gronn P. ( 2003) Leadership: Who needs it?School of Leadership and Management23(3): 267-290.
20.
Hardy C. ( 2001) Researching organizational discourse. International Studies of Management and Organization31(3): 25-47.
21.
Harley T. ( 2001) The Psychology of Language, 2nd edn. Hove, UK: Psychology Press .
22.
Hickman CR ( 1990) Mind of a Manager, Soul of a Leader. New York: Wiley.
23.
Holmes J. ( 2007) Humour and the construction of Maori leadership at work . Leadership3(1): 5-27.
24.
House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW and Gupta V (eds) (2004) Leadership, Culture and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. London: Sage.
25.
Jepson D.(2009) Studying leadership at cross-country level: A critical analysis. Leadership5(1): 61-80.
26.
Koivunen N. ( 2007) The processual nature of leadership discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management23: 285-305.
27.
Kotter JP (ed.) (1990) A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free Press.
28.
Laclau E. and Mouffe C. ( 1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
29.
Lane C. ( 1989) Management and Labour in Europe: The Industrial Enterprise in Germany, Britain and France. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
30.
Latour B. ( 1986) The powers of association. In: Law J (ed.) Power, Action and Belief. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul, 264-280.
31.
Latour B. ( 1992) Technology is society made durable. In: Law J (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. London: Routledge, 103-131.
32.
Lucy J. ( 2000) Introductory comments. In: Niemeier S and Dirven R (eds) Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins Publisher, ix-xxi.
33.
McSweeney B. ( 2002) Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis. Human Relations55(1): 89-118.
34.
Meindl J., Erlich S. and Dukerich J. ( 1985) The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly30: 78-102.
35.
Mintzberg H. ( 1980/1973) The Nature of Managerial Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36.
Morgan G. and Smircich L. ( 1980) The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review5(4): 491-500.
37.
Morrell K. ( 2006) Aphorisms and leaders’ rhetoric: A new analytical approach. Leadership2(3): 367-382.
38.
Mumby D. and Clair R. ( 1997) Organizational discourse. In: van Dijk TA (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, 181-205.
39.
Niemeier S. and Dirven R. ( 2000) Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins.
40.
Parry KW and Hansen H. ( 2007) The organizational story as leadership. Leadership3(3): 281-300.
41.
Potter J. ( 1997) Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In: Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research. London: Sage , 144-160.
42.
Prince L. ( 2005) Eating the Menu rather than the dinner: Tao and leadership . Leadership1(1): 105-126.
43.
Rost JC ( 1991) Leadership for the Twenty-first Century. Westport, CT: Praeger.
44.
Shamir B., Dayan-Horesh H. and Adler D. ( 2005) Leading by biography: Towards a life-story approach to the study of leadership. Leadership1(1): 13-29.
45.
Slobin DI ( 2000) Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In: Niemeier S and Dirven R (eds) Evidence for Linguistic Relativity . Amsterdam, PA: John Benjamins Publisher, 107-138.
46.
Sveningsson SF and Larsson M. ( 2006) Fantasies of leadership: Identity work. Leadership2(2): 203-224.
47.
Tayeb M. ( 2001) Conducting research across cultures: Overcoming drawbacks and obstacles. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management1(1): 91-108.
48.
Tietze S., Cohen L. and Musson G. ( 2003) Understanding Organizations through Language. London: Sage.
49.
Turnbull S. ( 2006) Post-millennial leadership refrains: Artists, performers and anti-heroes. Leadership2(2): 257-269.
50.
Warner LS and Grint K. ( 2006) American Indian ways of leading and knowing. Leadership2(2): 225-244.
51.
Wittgenstein L. ( 1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford : Blackwells.
52.
Zaleznik A. ( 1977) Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review55(3): 13-23.
53.
Zaleznik A. ( 2004) Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review82(1): 74-81.
