This study examines the key factors driving ChatGPT’s diffusion on X through the media effects and innovation diffusion theories. The findings reveal perceived usefulness was discussed more than topics like government regulations, with positive and neutral sentiments dominating. Theoretically, this study advances understanding of innovation diffusion via the media effects perspective. Practically, it offers guidance to AI developers and stakeholders for improving AI applications and decision-making.
AdamopoulouEMoussiadesL (2020) Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning and Applications: An International Journal2: 100006.
2.
AgathokleousESaitanisCJFangC, et al. (2023) Use of ChatGPT: What does it mean for biology and environmental science?Science of the Total Environment888: 164.
3.
BarnettGA (2011) Mathematical models of the diffusion process. In: VishwanathABarnettGA (eds) The Diffusion of Innovations: A Communication Science Perspective. Peter Lang Publishing, pp. 105–124.
BuneaAGuidolinMManfrediP, et al. (2022) Diffusion of solar PV energy in the UK: A comparison of sectoral patterns. Forecasting4: 456–476.
6.
CaoYZhaiJ (2023) Bridging the gap – The impact of ChatGPT on financial research. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies21(2): 177–191.
7.
ChangHHFuCSJainHT (2016) Modifying UTAUT and innovation diffusion theory to reveal online shopping behavior: Familiarity and perceived risk as mediators. Information Development32(5): 1757–1773.
8.
ChavanayarnS (2023) Navigating ethical complexities through epistemological analysis of ChatGPT. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society43(3-4): 105–114.
9.
ChongDDruckmanJN (2007) Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review101(4): 637–655.
10.
ChungKL (2023) What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. MIS Quarterly13(3): 319–340.
11.
DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35: 982–1003.
12.
DelellisNSChenYCornwellSE, et al. (2023) ChatGPT media coverage metrics; initial examination media coverage metrics; initial examination. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology60: 935–937.
13.
de VreeseCH (2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal13(1): 51–62.
14.
DobrinićčDGregurecIDobrinićD (2021) Attitudes of Croatian consumers about mobile messenger chatbots. Journal of information and organizational sciences45(2): 579–599.
DunawayJBystromKTinkhamS (2018) Media framing of climate change: A meta-analysis. Environmental Communication12(4): 471–485.
17.
EntmanRM (1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication43(4): 51–58.
18.
FamulariU (2020) Framing the Trump administration’s “Zero Tolerance” policy: A quantitative content analysis of news stories and visuals in US news websites. Journalism Studies21(16): 2267–2284.
19.
FaroughianFFKalafatisSPLeddenL, et al. (2012) Value and risk in business-to-business e-banking. Industrial Marketing Management41(1): 68–81.
20.
FarzinIMamdoohiARCiariF (2023) Autonomous vehicles acceptance: A perceived risk extension of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and diffusion of innovation, evidence from Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction39(13): 2663–2672.
21.
GargRAl-GaradiMAYangY, et al. (2023) Leveraging large language models and weak supervision for social media data annotation: An evaluation using COVID-19 self-reported vaccination tweets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06503. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.06503
22.
GursoyDLiYSongH (2023) ChatGPT and the hospitality and tourism industry: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management32(5): 579–592.
23.
HariHIyerRSampatB (2022) Customer brand engagement through Chatbots on bank websites– Examining the antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction38(13): 1212–1227.
24.
HuHZhangDWangC (2019) Impact of social media influencers’ endorsement on application adoption: A trust transfer perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal47(11): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8518
25.
HungJChenJ (2023) The benefits, risks and regulation of using ChatGPT in Chinese academia: A content analysis. Social Science12(7): 380.
26.
HwangSKimJ (2021) Toward a chatbot for financial sustainability. Sustainability13(6): 1–18.
27.
JeyaramanMBalajiSJeyaramanN, et al. (2023) Unraveling the ethical enigma: Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Cureus15(8): e43262.
28.
Jones-JangSMHartPSFeldmanL, et al. (2020) Diversifying or reinforcing science communication? Examining the flow of frame contagion across media platforms. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly97(1): 98–117.
29.
KushwahaAKKumarPKarAK (2021) What impacts customer experience for B2B enterprises on using AI-enabled chatbots? Insights from big data analytics. Industrial Marketing Management98: 207–221.
30.
KwangsawadAJattamartA (2022) Overcoming customer innovation resistance to the sustainable adoption of chatbot services: A community-enterprise perspective in Thailand. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge7(3): 100211.
31.
LechelerSKeerMSchuckART, et al. (2015) The effects of repetitive news framing on political opinions over time. Communication Monographs82(3): 339–358.
32.
LyuHHuangJZhangD, et al. (2023) GPT-4V(ision) as a social media analysis engine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.07547.
33.
McCombsM (2005) A look at agenda-setting: Past, present, and future. Journalism Studies6(4): 543–557.
34.
McCombsMEReynoldsA (2009) How the news shapes our civic agenda. In: BryantJOliverMB (eds) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, pp.1–16.
35.
McCombsMEShawDL (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36: 176–187.
36.
MuralidharanSDillistoneKHensonJ (2011) The role of social media in building a better understanding of the 2011. Egyptian Revolution. Journal of Mass Communication & Journalism1(1): 1–9.
37.
PanZKosickiGM (2010) Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication10(1): 55–75.
38.
PendyalaVSHallCE (2024) Explaining misinformation detection using large language models. Electronics13(9): 1673.
39.
PurwiyatiRDaroiniATalkahA (2020) The influences of cyber extension and communication media (Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube) on innovation adoption in Nganjuk regency. Habitat31(2): 86–94.
40.
RogersEM (ed.) (1962) Diffusion of Innovations, 1st edn. Free Press of Glencoe.
41.
RogersME (ed.) (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn.Free Press.
42.
Russell NeumanWGuggenheimLMo JangS, et al. (2014) The dynamics of public attention: Agenda-setting theory meets big data. Journal of Communication64: 193–214.
43.
ScheufeleDA (1999) Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication49(1): 103–122.
44.
ScheufeleDATewksburyD (2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication57: 9–20.
45.
SeverinWTankardJ (eds) (2001) Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media, 5th edn.Longman.
46.
ValkenburgPMPeterJWaltherJB (2016) Media effects: Theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology67: 315–338.
47.
VaswaniAShazeerNParmarN, et al. (2017) Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762
48.
VenkateshVMorrisMGDavisGB, et al. (2003) User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly27: 425–478.
49.
WeaverDH (1977) Political issues and voter need for orientation. In:McCombsMEShawDLWeaverDH (eds) The Emergence of American Public Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of The Press. West Publishing Company, pp.107–119.
50.
YangFWendorf MuhamadJYangQ (2019) Exploring environmental health on Weibo: A textual analysis of framing haze-related stories on Chinese social media. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16(13): 2374.
51.
YangL (2023) Research on the legal regulation of generative artificial intelligence: Take ChatGPT as an example. SHS Web of Conference, 178, Article 01017, https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202317802017
52.
YanYLiBFengJ, et al. (2023) Research on the impact of trends related to ChatGPT. Procedia Computer Science221: 1284–1291.
53.
ZhuGChenYZhengJ (2020) Modelling the acceptance of fully autonomous vehicles: A media-based perception and adoption model. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour73: 80–91.
