Moisture Buffering and its Consequence in Whole Building Hygrothermal Modeling

Abstract

Moisture absorption and desorption of materials in contact with indoor air of buildings can be used as a passive, i.e., nonmechanical, way to moderate the variation of indoor humidity. This phenomenon, which is recognized as `moisture buffering', could potentially be used as an attractive feature of building products to improve indoor air quality and to save energy. Of interest therefore is to establish a unit to appraise this quality of building products and to investigate the importance of moisture buffering when it is considered in whole building hygrothermal simulation. This paper will illustrate both.

A new test method specifies a protocol for determination of what has recently been termed the Moisture Buffer Value (MBV) of building products. The paper presents the definition of MBV and introduces a test protocol which has been proposed for its experimental determination. The MBV is primarily meant as a value to characterize the ability of building products to moderate the variations of humidity in air which is in contact with the products, since it indicates the rate of flow of moisture over the product's surface when exposed to a certain humidity excitation.

Hygroscopic interaction between air of the indoor climate and materials in the building envelope is taken into account in a model for whole building heat and moisture simulation. By means of an example, it will be investigated if:

1. it is possible to use the benefits of moisture buffering to save energy by reducing the requirement for ventilation if indoor humidity is a parameter for controlling ventilation rate,

2. it is possible to improve the perceived acceptability of indoor air, as judged by the temperature and humidity of the air, by using moisture buffering to control the indoor humidity.

The results of the whole building hygrothermal simulations show that it is possible to rather significantly reduce the amplitudes of indoor relative variation when the moisture buffering effect of building materials is taken into account, compared to a situation with moisture tight interior building surfaces. The modeling also shows some possible benefits on energy consumption if humidity-controlled ventilation is employed, as well some benefit on the indoor acceptability with the hygrothermal quality of indoor air. However, both benefits seem to be somewhat limited in the model room used for analysis.

Keywords

moisture buffering moisture buffer value ventilation indoor humidity energy NORDTEST IEA.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bednar, T. and Hagentoft, C.E. (2005). Analytical Solution for Moisture Buffering Effect. Validation Exercises for Simulation Tools , In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics, Reykjavik, pp. 13-15.

Bornehag, C.G. , Sundell, J. and Sigsgaard, T. (2004). Dampness in Buildings and Health (DBH): Report from an Ongoing Epidemiological Investigation on the Association Between Indoor Environmental Factors and Health Effects Among Children in Sweden , Indoor Air, 14(Suppl. 7): 59-66.

Danish Building Research Institute. (2007). BSim - Building Simulation. www.BSim.dk.

Fang, L. , Clausen, G. and Fanger, P.O. (1998). Impact of Temperature and Humidity on the Perception of Indoor Air Quality , Indoor Air, 8(2): 80-90.

Hagentoft, C.E. (2001). Introduction to Building Physics, Studentlitteratur .

Hansen, E. de Place and Hansen, K.K. (2000). Lerstensprodukters fugttekniske og styrkemæssige egenskaber; Moisture and mechanical properties of clay tile products (in Danish) . Department of Structural Engineering and Materials, Technical University of Denmark , Series R No. 71.

IEA Energy Conservation in Buildings and Community Systems Programme (ECBCS). (2007). Annex 41, Whole Building Heat, Air and Moisture Response. http://www.kuleuven.be/bwf/projects/annex41/.

Judkoff, R. and Neymark, J. (1995). Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST) and Diagnostic Method, NREL/TP-472-6231, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colo.

Kumaran, M.K. (1996). Material Properties - Final Report, Volume 3. IEA Annex 24 (Heat, Air and Moisture Transfer in Insulated Envelope Parts. KU Leuven, Belgium. Laboratorium Bouwfysica, Departement Burgerlijke Bouwkunde .

10.

Osanyintola, O. and Simonson, C. (2006). Moisture Buffering Capacity of Hygroscopic Building Materials: Experimental Facilities and Energy Impact , Energy and Buildings, 38: 1270-1282.

11.

Ramos, N. and de Freitas, V. (2005). A Simple Method for Hygroscopic Inertia Impact Assessment. Working paper A41-T1-P-05-3 for IEA Annex 41 project, Whole Building Heat air and Moisture Response.

12.

Rode, C. (ed.). (2003a). NORDTEST Workshop on Moisture Buffer Capacity - Collection of Abstracts. 21-22, August, Technical University of Denmark .

13.

Rode, C. (ed.). (2003b). Workshop on Moisture Buffer Capacity - Summary Report, 21-22, August, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark , R-067.

14.

Rode, C. (ed.). (2005). Moisture Buffering of Building Materials, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark , Report R-126.

15.

Rode, C. and Grau, K. (2003). Whole Building Hygrothermal Simulation Model , ASHRAE Transactions, 109(1): 572-582.

16.

Roels, S. and Janssen, H. (2006). A Comparison of the Nordtest and Japanese Test Methods for the Moisture Buffering Performance of Building Materials , Journal of Building Physics, 30(2): 137-161.

17.

Simonson, C. , Salonvaara, M. and Ojanen, T. (2002). The Effect of Structures on Indoor Humidity - Possibility to Improve Comfort and Perceived Air Quality , Indoor Air, 12(4): 243-251.

18.

Time, B. (1998). Hygroscopic Moisture Transport in Wood. Dr. Ing. Thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology .