On the Application of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis with Abstract Building Performance Simulation Tools

Abstract

Building performance simulation (BPS) is a powerful measure to educate the building design process. However, its use in practice is to a large extent limited to the detailed design stage dedicated to the code compliance analysis of worked out design proposals. BPS is not much used to support the conceptual design stage. To date BPS tools are regarded as pure analysis tools, which do not provide design information. It is hypothesized that, when integrating uncertainty analysis techniques to existing BPS tools, following an incremental research approach, valuable design information can be provided. The article gives an update on the process to extend the capabilities of a tool specifically developed to support the conceptual design stage about uncertainty assessment. The resulting prototype should be capable of providing information about the variation of specific building performance metrics (simulation output) based on the propagated uncertainties of the building specification (simulation input). The main focus was herby the representation of material properties and their impact on the performance uncertainty of the building concept. The results also indicate the degree of impact, sensitivity, of the building specification parameters on the variation of the performance metrics as a result of their uncertainty.

Keywords

concept design uncertainty analysis sensitivity analysis specification uncertainty material properties building performance simulation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Homoud, M.S. (2005). A Systematic Approach for the Thermal Design Optimization of Building Envelopes, Journal of Building Physics, 29: 95-119.

Clarke, J.A. , Yaneske, P.P. and Pinney, A.A. (1991). The Harmonisation of Thermal Properties of Building Materials, Garston, Watford, UK , BRE.

Crawley, D.B. , Hand, J.W. , Kummert, M. and Griffith, B.T. (2008). Contrasting the Capabilities of Building Energy Performance Simulation Programs, Building and Environment , 43: 661-673.

De Wit, M.S. (2001). Uncertainty in Predictions of Thermal Comfort in Buildings, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, The Netherlands.

Hopfe, C.J. , Struck, C. , Ulukavak Harputlugil, G. and Hensen, J. (2006). Computational tools for Building Services Design - Professional's Practice and Wishes, In: 17th International Air-conditioning and Ventilation Conference, STP - Society of Environmental Engineering, Prague .

Hopfe, C.J. , Struck, C. , Ulukavak Harputlugil, G. , Hensen, J. and Wilde, P.D. (2005). Exploration of using Building Performance Simulation Tools for Conceptual Building Design, In: IBPSA-NVL Conference, Delft, The Netherlands.

Judkoff, R. and Neymark, J. (1995). International Energy Agency Building Energy Simulation Test (BESTEST) and Diagnostic Method, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

Lomas, K.J. and Eppel, H. (1992). Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Building Thermal Simulation Programs, Energy and Buildings, 19: 21-44.

MacDonald, I. (2002). Quantifying the Effects of Uncertainty in Building Simulation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Energy Systems Research Unit, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.

10.

Saltelli, A. , Ratto, M. , Tarantola, S. and Campolongo, F. (2006). Sensitivity Analysis Practices: Strategies for Model-Based Inference, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91: 1109-1125.

11.

Struck, C. , De Wilde, P. , Hopfe, C.J. and Hensen, J. (2008). An Exploration of the Option Space in Student Design Projects for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis with Performance Simulation. In: Rafiq, Y. , Wilde, P.D. and Borthwick, M. (eds), Intelligent Computing in Engineering (ICE08) - A Joint US-European Workshop, Plymouth, UK: University of Plymouth.

12.

Struck, C. and Hensen, J. (2006). Uncertainty analysis for Conceptual Building Design - A Review of Input Data, In: 1st Int. IBPSA Germany/Austria Conf. BauSIM, International Building Performance Simulation Association, Technische Universitaet Muenchen.

13.

Urban, B. and Glicksman, L. (2006). The MIT Design Advisor - A Fast, Simple Tool for Energy Efficient Building Design, In: SimBuild 2006, Cambridge, MA, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology .

14.

Vabi, B.V. (2006). User Manual h.e.n.k. v3.0 - Handleiding h.e.n.k. v3.0, Vabi BV, Delft, The Netherlands.

15.

Verbeeck, G. and Hens, H. (2007). Life Cycle Optimization of Extremely Low Energy Dwellings, Journal of Building Physics, 31: 143-177.